@G2 That one is the previous F-14D. I might, but the part count will likely be over 500
@TheWeebREBORN I don't see why it wouldn't :v
@GAMINGOTAKU66 Canard tomcat is an interesting concept... It makes a lot more stable. Although my F-14D's flight model isn't the best
@Ded Yeah the F-14 is a hard one to do low part... I might just embrace it and do a livery for it. As long as its under 500 I'm happy though
.
btw y ded big sad you were very cool
@OkaNieba Pretty happy with the F-16, the next Viper is probably going to be a CFT model or some other variant
YF-23 probably no at the moment
Bomber idk
@Ocean70 Eurodelta of some variety maybe
@SyntheticL I might be able to upgrade the F-5C into an F-5E... although I also kinda want to remake it from scratch
@TheWeebREBORN That is true, it gains energy really quickly, which is good. I guess it's not always about low-speed nose authority if you can stay fast.
If it's going to go stand toe-to-toe with an F-22, it needs more maneuverability, especially in the low speed. I was able to get ~20 degrees pitch rate and ~18 degrees AOA at ~600 km/h, but an F-16 and F-22 can get 20-25 degrees pitch rate, with the F-22 having even higher AOA.
Making the COM and COL being closer together and making the canards flat bottom wings might help.
@TheWeebREBORN Are you using the AAM-4? I added it to the WBD if you want to use the latest version
It's just a rescaled vanilla Interceptor with roughly the same XML as the AMRAAM
@ZeroWithSlashedO you might need to add hidden wings inside the LEX's
The COM and COL should be very close together, to the point where its nearly unflyable without FBW
@G2 That one is the previous F-14D. I might, but the part count will likely be over 500
+1@TheWeebREBORN I don't see why it wouldn't :v
@GAMINGOTAKU66 Canard tomcat is an interesting concept... It makes a lot more stable. Although my F-14D's flight model isn't the best
🔥👌
+2Yooo
+4"You humans will be sorely missed"
- Jundroo on improved AI
Andrewnium: ???,???
+1@GAMINGOTAKU66 just above, still under 500
The mods could be any one of us.
+1It could be you.
It could be me.
IT COULD EVEN BE
Spine Breaker (tm)
Ỳ̴͈ọ̵͓͠u̶̙̐̆r̴̬̾́͜ ̷̫̦̈́a̴̧͂c̷͉̆ţ̵̎ĩ̴̛̩ỏ̵͉̟͐ņ̴̹͊̾s̵̠̳̈́͋ ̷̭̳͑͠h̴̳̗̊ȁ̵̙v̷̮̪͊̆ě̸̖̋͜ ̶̡̱̔c̸̖̉ō̶̳͍͗ǹ̵̗̞́s̵̼͆̚ę̵̉q̷͙̏̑u̶̝̦͛̅é̴͍n̸̺̈́̉c̶̨̽è̴͙͠ş̸̖̇
+1venus
+2@ALTMTR oh that'd be easy then
+2Just Restart Here but without resetting everything else
That'd be hard to program to be compatible with custom weapons
+2@Ded Yeah the F-14 is a hard one to do low part... I might just embrace it and do a livery for it. As long as its under 500 I'm happy though
+1.
btw y ded big sad you were very cool
Landing challenges with RTX???
@OkaNieba Pretty happy with the F-16, the next Viper is probably going to be a CFT model or some other variant
+1YF-23 probably no at the moment
Bomber idk
@Ocean70 Eurodelta of some variety maybe
@SyntheticL I might be able to upgrade the F-5C into an F-5E... although I also kinda want to remake it from scratch
Updated Part Count: 400+ w/ 4x AIM-54C :(
@TheWeebREBORN That is true, it gains energy really quickly, which is good. I guess it's not always about low-speed nose authority if you can stay fast.
If it's going to go stand toe-to-toe with an F-22, it needs more maneuverability, especially in the low speed. I was able to get ~20 degrees pitch rate and ~18 degrees AOA at ~600 km/h, but an F-16 and F-22 can get 20-25 degrees pitch rate, with the F-22 having even higher AOA.
+3Making the COM and COL being closer together and making the canards flat bottom wings might help.
@BeastHunter i don't plan on doing it since this is a late A-model. Most F-14A's at this point had them disabled or welded shut.
+3@GAMINGOTAKU66 of course
@TheWeebREBORN Are you using the AAM-4? I added it to the WBD if you want to use the latest version
It's just a rescaled vanilla Interceptor with roughly the same XML as the AMRAAM
SP has been crashing a lot for me in the builder. More than 20+ times per session.
+1
+3FireAndForgetfor missiles plsFan. Bloody. Tastic.
+1F15 pfp gang
Is that... Seven Nation Army but not the remix?
+1A rare sight to behold
@TheWeebREBORN godzilla?
I think this and the raptor should be similar in pitch rate except at low speed where the raptor is superior
2013/14ish era F1?
+1p u l l u p
+4T E R R A I N
T E R R A I N
p u l l u p
p u l l u p
bankanglebankangle@Dizwerwirt The Viper is a very twitchy aircraft, which is replicated here. You have to counter-roll if you're flying with a keyboard.
+2based
+1hey its the besiege starter block
@TheWeebREBORN Typhoon? 👁👄👁
@ZeroWithSlashedO @Diloph Thanks!
+1@TRD6932 Technically everything before the F/A-18F is outdated :v. I've been thinking about doing the raptor again
:O
+5hi
+2@KnightOfRen
@donkski
@TRD6932
@Diloph
@Brayden1981
+1@OkaNieba
@BeastHunter
@KDnotSPy
@SCPCalebkid
@SELWYN101
It costs four-hundred-thousand dollars to fire this weapon.
+3For twelve seconds.
Is it time for the gladatorial tournament?
+8VIIIIINCEEEEEEEEEENT
+10@Tookan the duality of man
+3I want to say yes on ultra low settings.
But WT has become less optimized so idk, but there's no harm in trying
Plot twist: it was pyrite rank all along
He did the 🥓 🍳 ??!!?! 🤨🤨🤨
+3@ZeroWithSlashedO you might need to add hidden wings inside the LEX's
+1The COM and COL should be very close together, to the point where its nearly unflyable without FBW
@TheWeebREBORN done
I don't know if android has it, but console is helpful for testing maneuverability with
+1DebugExpression -PitchRateandDebugExpression -AngleOfAttackThe unofficial theme song of this
+2