@Nerfaddict Well I can't say for certain, but the specific conditions are 25+ AOA sustained for at least 30 seconds, below 540 km/h, with full burner. You might have to keep the burner on for a bit before it stalls. The most predictable way is to use debugExpression, but it is hard to stall the engines on purpose.
@MrShenanigansSP Thanks, I did use Baconeggs' blueprints :v
@UmbrellaCorporation The engines have the correct amount of thrust. These are TF30's, the F-14A was called the worst engine to airframe mismatch for a reason. Although, if taking off is hard, you're probably pulling up too early
@offiry Thanks a bunch. I also play MP, so I try to make these work with that. That's why I try to go for low-part and have AG8 disable weapons so you don't lock onto other peeps.
Here are some pictures I took of the F-14 in person, just for fun. F-14D: Completely hollow, no engines, no instruments, nothing. F-14A: This one actually still has the engines at least, but they are TF30's.
@Grob0s0VBRa @MrGreen Thanks for the help. I couldn't get them to work though, although I'm probably just being dumb.
@MrShenanigansSP It's actually pretty hard to put this one into a flat spin even with assymmetric thrust
.
I tried using a new set of FT that turns off the engines permanently after 30 seconds of sustained 25+ degrees AOA at less than 540 km/h GS with full burner. I think it's a pretty good balance since in order to induce the stall, you really have to try to do it on purpose
@G2 That one is the previous F-14D. I might, but the part count will likely be over 500
@TheWeebREBORN I don't see why it wouldn't :v
@GAMINGOTAKU66 Canard tomcat is an interesting concept... It makes a lot more stable. Although my F-14D's flight model isn't the best
@Ded Yeah the F-14 is a hard one to do low part... I might just embrace it and do a livery for it. As long as its under 500 I'm happy though
.
btw y ded big sad you were very cool
@OkaNieba Pretty happy with the F-16, the next Viper is probably going to be a CFT model or some other variant
YF-23 probably no at the moment
Bomber idk
@Ocean70 Eurodelta of some variety maybe
@SyntheticL I might be able to upgrade the F-5C into an F-5E... although I also kinda want to remake it from scratch
@TheWeebREBORN That is true, it gains energy really quickly, which is good. I guess it's not always about low-speed nose authority if you can stay fast.
@NEOCORP Because when you pull full aft stick in a fighter jet, they tend to not like it very much, especially this one.
+1@TRD6932 it cannot, iirc that was for experimental purposes
@OrionIndustries second one is the Pacific Coast Air Museum, they're great too
@Nerfaddict Well I can't say for certain, but the specific conditions are 25+ AOA sustained for at least 30 seconds, below 540 km/h, with full burner. You might have to keep the burner on for a bit before it stalls. The most predictable way is to use debugExpression, but it is hard to stall the engines on purpose.
Back from the dead I see?
A surprise to be sure, but a welcome one.
@Mage2IsTriggered Silverstone '22 was an absolute banger
+1So proud of Mick and Sainz
Where plane
@MrShenanigansSP Thanks, I did use Baconeggs' blueprints :v
+1@UmbrellaCorporation The engines have the correct amount of thrust. These are TF30's, the F-14A was called the worst engine to airframe mismatch for a reason. Although, if taking off is hard, you're probably pulling up too early
WOOOOOOOOOOOOO YEEAAAH NEW PHONE!!!1!1!!1!!!!11
.
now what
@offiry Thanks a bunch. I also play MP, so I try to make these work with that. That's why I try to go for low-part and have AG8 disable weapons so you don't lock onto other peeps.
@Phox Of course it ca- EJECT EJECT EJECT EJECT
@TheCommentaryGuy woops, its probably because you asked T on 2 teasers.
Alt.Config.3 is the GBU one
@V I already used the permanent engine stall solution, but I'll try that
- Scrambled, Ramsay or YSAC style
- Pretty long
- My F-15
- Most sandwiches: sourdough, Grilled Cheese: shokupan/white
- Windows
- cool and good
+2Here are some pictures I took of the F-14 in person, just for fun.
F-14D: Completely hollow, no engines, no instruments, nothing.
F-14A: This one actually still has the engines at least, but they are TF30's.
Here's my submission.
It's not a successor yet, but I asked a mod to change it.
+1@TheCommentaryGuy @Winterfield @PlayMinecraft
@AdmiralWheatman @offiry @SyntheticL
@SCPCalebkid @Winterfield @Titaninfernal1
@donkski @TRD6932 @SELWYN101
@MrShenanigansSP @TheCommentaryGuy @BeastHunter
+3@Grob0s0VBRa @MrGreen Thanks for the help. I couldn't get them to work though, although I'm probably just being dumb.
@MrShenanigansSP It's actually pretty hard to put this one into a flat spin even with assymmetric thrust
.
+2I tried using a new set of FT that turns off the engines permanently after 30 seconds of sustained 25+ degrees AOA at less than 540 km/h GS with full burner. I think it's a pretty good balance since in order to induce the stall, you really have to try to do it on purpose
Here's the current code. The engine input is multiplied by this:
1-(GS > 25 & smooth(RollAngle,.01)<0 ? clamp01(abs(round(smooth(AngleOfAttack/50,.01)))) : 0)
The roll angle bit is arbitrary, but it makes only one engine stall at a time.
@Inuyasha8215 An-22?
Just like the old phantom phaceoff from a while back
.
Now that i think about it, wiimini never posted (or phinished) his
April fools was 3 months ago, bub.
+1Sauce's F-16C
+1Fuselage control surfaces in general do not work, including airbrakes. A hidden airbrake will help tho
+1there is a fulcrum among us
+1Zoom pls
Landing gear
+5@SoupTime9957 They are automatic, starting to sweep at around 720 kmh and fully back by about mach 1
Do you ever just look at real life objects and think about how it would be made using SP fuselages
+5At least one works :P
+1@G2 That one is the previous F-14D. I might, but the part count will likely be over 500
+1@TheWeebREBORN I don't see why it wouldn't :v
@GAMINGOTAKU66 Canard tomcat is an interesting concept... It makes a lot more stable. Although my F-14D's flight model isn't the best
🔥👌
+2Yooo
+4"You humans will be sorely missed"
- Jundroo on improved AI
Andrewnium: ???,???
+1@GAMINGOTAKU66 just above, still under 500
The mods could be any one of us.
+1It could be you.
It could be me.
IT COULD EVEN BE
Spine Breaker (tm)
Ỳ̴͈ọ̵͓͠u̶̙̐̆r̴̬̾́͜ ̷̫̦̈́a̴̧͂c̷͉̆ţ̵̎ĩ̴̛̩ỏ̵͉̟͐ņ̴̹͊̾s̵̠̳̈́͋ ̷̭̳͑͠h̴̳̗̊ȁ̵̙v̷̮̪͊̆ě̸̖̋͜ ̶̡̱̔c̸̖̉ō̶̳͍͗ǹ̵̗̞́s̵̼͆̚ę̵̉q̷͙̏̑u̶̝̦͛̅é̴͍n̸̺̈́̉c̶̨̽è̴͙͠ş̸̖̇
+1venus
+2@ALTMTR oh that'd be easy then
+2Just Restart Here but without resetting everything else
That'd be hard to program to be compatible with custom weapons
+2@Ded Yeah the F-14 is a hard one to do low part... I might just embrace it and do a livery for it. As long as its under 500 I'm happy though
+1.
btw y ded big sad you were very cool
Landing challenges with RTX???
@OkaNieba Pretty happy with the F-16, the next Viper is probably going to be a CFT model or some other variant
+1YF-23 probably no at the moment
Bomber idk
@Ocean70 Eurodelta of some variety maybe
@SyntheticL I might be able to upgrade the F-5C into an F-5E... although I also kinda want to remake it from scratch
Updated Part Count: 400+ w/ 4x AIM-54C :(
@TheWeebREBORN That is true, it gains energy really quickly, which is good. I guess it's not always about low-speed nose authority if you can stay fast.