SimplePlanes
The builder we have is great for a general audience to pick up the game and build something semi-decent/accurate, but a more advanced option would be cool.
@PlaneFlightX Basically this
@IceCraftGaming I concur that, without a doubt, the currently available evidence, does in fact, seems to point towards the hypothesis which you have proposed being a true statement.
@asteroidbook345 Let g ∈ {all girls}
yRg iff (g likes y)
There is no such p such that yRp, where p ∈ {all people}.
The set {all girls} is a subset of the set {all people}.
Therefore, there is no g such that yRg. QED ☐ ✓
I'm not sure if I'm visualizing this right, but tan(x) is very different from sin(x) and cos(x).
You should be able to get away with multiple sin(x) or cos(x) graphs with different x offsets to get what you have in the picture.
HELL YEAH!
I've been dabbling with differential thrust on mine too!
another one
@ReturnOfJeffChandler You are now on trial crimes against the aviation community. What say you?
@IceCraftGaming bread 👍
+1I think they're alright.
That's realistic.
In the F-14 situation, you can use rudders in SP to perform hammerheads given it has enough authority.
+1It's probably not funky tree enabled which means you can't.
Dude, those are sick! What camera do you use?
+3Also is it me or is the Raptor Demo Team F-22's paint getting more and more faded :/
So like Growling Sidewinder for SP?
+1Sure!
NICE
+3PAT gang
+2Average P-51 fan vs P-38 enjoyer
+2Harrier on a diet
+2Bomb busts through ceiling
+16"Sorry to barge in, but do any of you chaps happen to know the Pythagorean Theorem?"
If Britain made another bomber, I feel like they'd name it after the Lancaster but it is nice to see a fellow Blenheim enjoyer
+1same vibe
+8There are people that ...don't like the mirage?
+1Other than using blueprints, section the plane off into sections that can be built with SP fuselages.
@PlaneFlightX We have found a glitch in the matrix
+1@AnOmalOcaris As someone making a 109, I can say it is possible without paneling.
Yukikaze vibe
SimplePlanes
+4The builder we have is great for a general audience to pick up the game and build something semi-decent/accurate, but a more advanced option would be cool.
@PlaneFlightX Basically this
based
"Tower, coming in for land-" thud
+1...
"Tower, the gauges just fell onto the floor."
Triebflugel:
+1Maybe more downforce?
Thatd be nice
No hard dates afaik, but look out for Maker Game Sales, the Christmas Sale, and Summer Sale.
When I bought this game, it went on sale the next day
gun
@IceCraftGaming I concur that, without a doubt, the currently available evidence, does in fact, seems to point towards the hypothesis which you have proposed being a true statement.
+2Canards.zip
+1@Stanmich Besiege: AMATEURS
+1F35 snoot
+1I would kill for slabs/stairs in these colors in MC
+4Every block should have a slab/stair, ESPECIALLY concrete, wool, and terracotta
Hoonda
+1@rexzion Yeah that was the idea.
The main issue is still the prop engine. Even with "half" as much HP as the real DB605A, it accelerates too fast
btw ive been using your 109 as a reference for the FM a little bit
+1@asteroidbook345 Let g ∈ {all girls}
yRg iff (g likes y)
There is no such p such that yRp, where p ∈ {all people}.
The set {all girls} is a subset of the set {all people}.
Therefore, there is no g such that yRg.
QED ☐ ✓
The US naval 5 in. guns are dual purpose so it makes sense that they are flak in SP
It aint me
I aint no yeet boi's son
@IceCraftGaming pow(CommentSection, 100)
+2I'm not sure if I'm visualizing this right, but tan(x) is very different from sin(x) and cos(x).
+2You should be able to get away with multiple sin(x) or cos(x) graphs with different x offsets to get what you have in the picture.
@IICXLVIICDLXXXIIIDCXLVII Apparently bananas make the SP community go monke brain
+1Missile away
+2VenaCHONKER
WHOOOO?
+1@Freerider2142 Thank you!
+1@Souplane Use mouse control.
+1Its got a star fox kind of vibe
+3How is he managing that? I thought he was busy being the king of Sri Lanka
+1[ SHOOT ]
+2based
+2I think this is more accurate
+2