@ThomasRoderick not really, I used the f82 as inspiration but this is totally different. The f82 had 1.5 wings, this has the same wing as the single seat version, the tail, fus etc are different etc
@Carbonfox1 it was a really troublesome build to be fair, trying to get the cockpit so it wasn't visible in the ducted fan not to mention the colour scheme lines :)
@carnationRED the mod works to do What it says on the tin but also destabilise the game leading to loads of crashes, I have it turned off while building (lost loads of work before I figured that it was this mod) then just enable it before publishing, can you have a look and see if there's anything you can do to improve its compatibility?
@Tang0five Yeah, I was mislead by a website there, it had it down as a means to an end, which I thought was appropriate for a heavy bomber, but now I've googled it, it pretty much just meant goodbye... so I've renamed it :) thanks for pointing that out.
@RYAviation the wheels judder, if I remove all forward traction it fixes it but then they don't rotate... I have it set at 0.5 for a compromise. The gear doors are a bit of a cheat, they are up on the build but lower automatically when you load in :) easy to line up that way
@Strikefighter04 lol, ive never really monitored followers, im glad people like what i do enough to follow me though. This was a build i had 75% complete (see forum post of what to finish), ive got loads at present that i just couldnt be bothered to finish.
To be fair it's a smart looking build but it isn't a spitfire, the fuselage, fin, tail, wing shape etc isn't right, but all that apart it is a nice looking creation, if you had named it as a fictional build it would have been awesome :) @HistoricBirds
@8bitgamer33 was launcher fully up?
What section size is it? Looks like a 254x146 universal beam (I beam), but the web and flange thickness is wrong... :)
+1@BlackhattAircraft ah well, you have rectified than now then =)
@ThePilotDude most of my builds falter before 50... but just occasionally one hits it off =)
@8bitgamer33 mhm, so do real ww2 aircraft as the hydraulic pressure is greater in one side.
+1@8bitgamer33 eh? oh are you on about the fact they eject?
@Indecision tbf you only have 2 builds, and both have awesome numbers of upvotes, my first build got 6 i think =)
@BaconRoll @DerekSP @Chancey21 Thanks, i still think i might re-build it, im sure i can do better now =)
+2@YeYeGuys5 @Duoof1w3 @fidgetspinnerboi19 thanks for the votes, first build over 100 votes :)
@OC3LOT1142 thanks for the upvotes, nearly to 100 votes.
@ThomasRoderick not really, I used the f82 as inspiration but this is totally different. The f82 had 1.5 wings, this has the same wing as the single seat version, the tail, fus etc are different etc
+1@ThomasRoderick export version.
Try this if the bomber is still too many parts for your device.
@GreatHenry being hollow, camo, cockpits, custom u/c etc
@Carbonfox1 press ag1, when flaps are down it limits roll because of sp physics
@grizzlitn thanks, I was v happy with the way it turned out, looks menacing but fast :)
+1@LOWEWAYY fleet air arm
@Carbonfox1 it was a really troublesome build to be fair, trying to get the cockpit so it wasn't visible in the ducted fan not to mention the colour scheme lines :)
@SakuraSaku thanks for the upvotes, glad you like the builds, nearly got my first 100 upvote build :)
@SakuraSaku thanks, yeah I'm surprised that you are the only comment, I thought it would have been more popular but nvm.
@Carbonfox1 thanks :)
@MailboxIsMyGender I'll have to rebuild it at some point :) I can probs do the two tone bit now.
+1@TakicraftCorporation no I meant disable the screenshot mod, that causes my game to crash.
screenshot mod.
@EternalDarkness ah ok, just the button stays there saying upvote.
@EternalDarkness just out of curiosity but have you also disabled new upvotes on that post? It wont let me add one...
for some reason i cant upvote this?? I click the button but it doesnt actually upvote...
@Spitfirelad05 there is a 2 seat trainer of the do335, and in my opinion that's always been the better looking version, hence the layout of this
@Type2volkswagen @Spitfirelad05 @XjayIndustrys thanks for the support and comments, much appreciated
+1@Trainzo @Carbonfox1 @horatio thanks again for your support and xomments
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck well someone still has to fly the plane, rotating for sleep.
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck they add a couple of hundred parts and loads of time, the bomber is huge so I'd be looking at 5-6 seats etc.
@carnationRED the mod works to do What it says on the tin but also destabilise the game leading to loads of crashes, I have it turned off while building (lost loads of work before I figured that it was this mod) then just enable it before publishing, can you have a look and see if there's anything you can do to improve its compatibility?
Yep screenshot mod did it for me. Took that off and it worked fine
+1@GeneralOliverVonBismarck do you mean on my forum post? If so then plane number 1 wasn't going to have a cockpit.
@Trainzo thanks :) I really liked the way this one turned out.
Number 4 is published here@Type2volkswagen @CptJacobson @ThePilotDude
@LOWEWAYY 2 full detail engines, hollow fuselage parts, camo, hollow wing etc etc.
@LOWEWAYY sorry but no. I've made mobile versions of things in the past and they just are not successful.
@CrazyCatZe thanks :)
I've not seen tailspin since i was a kid, awesome memories.
@Tang0five Yeah, I was mislead by a website there, it had it down as a means to an end, which I thought was appropriate for a heavy bomber, but now I've googled it, it pretty much just meant goodbye... so I've renamed it :) thanks for pointing that out.
@RYAviation the wheels judder, if I remove all forward traction it fixes it but then they don't rotate... I have it set at 0.5 for a compromise. The gear doors are a bit of a cheat, they are up on the build but lower automatically when you load in :) easy to line up that way
@RAF1 someone stood on thunderbird 2 :)
+1Well, number 3 got finished first, 1 and 4 will be next probably :) here for no 3
@Strikefighter04 lol, ive never really monitored followers, im glad people like what i do enough to follow me though. This was a build i had 75% complete (see forum post of what to finish), ive got loads at present that i just couldnt be bothered to finish.
+1What about the fuselage cones that resize the wrong way when you attach them to fuselage cones which are not round...
+4To be fair it's a smart looking build but it isn't a spitfire, the fuselage, fin, tail, wing shape etc isn't right, but all that apart it is a nice looking creation, if you had named it as a fictional build it would have been awesome :) @HistoricBirds
Drop the photo into discord first, use link to photo then as per ED comment
+1@Chancey21 so it has to be a repost, single seat, jet, tag as fighter, not flyable, under 150 parts with no description. I can manage that ;)
+2