@ToeTips I don't have a specific label, unfortunately. The logos in my profile, while being the actual logos, were made at least 5 years ago by someone who just wanted to quickly create a Gravatar image. I have plans to update them at some point, which will likely be when I start work on the liveries.
Yep, this plane has more theoretical parts than the Yamato (plus it has thousands of variables and insanely complex systems).
@ToeTips Sure, you can use any one of the four.
About the update, this will not affect the SWL-120 in any way. I have many plans for the future; SP has been the only game I've played in the last few months, and it has been the main game for the last few years. In fact, I've recently ramped up SWL-120 production with more free time.
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes Exactly. I've been working on my SWL-120 for 2 years now, with plans to refine and further improve it next year, and I am still very interested in SP. In fact, it's the only game I've played at all the last few months.
@maddogfike @MADDOGLUCAS @MobileBuilder21 The post literally says they are not adding any more features to SimplePlanes. Asking for updates will get you nowhere.
If there is no "cockpit" camera (appears after flyby view) available, using the "previous view" input does not loop continuously. I'm not sure how else to explain it. For example, let's say I have a craft with no custom cameras at all, and the cockpit camera (on the primary cockpit part) set to "disabled". If I press "C", I can continuously cycle through all views forever. However, if I use the keybind "Shift + C" (or any custom ones, like the back side button on my mouse), I get stuck at chase view. If I then enable the cockpit camera or add a custom camera (basically adding a cockpit view camera position), I can cycle backwards continuously.
To sum up the paragraph above, if there is no default cockpit view, the previous camera input will stop at chase view.
bug
If a part outputting to a variable (such as a shock) is destroyed, a bunch of null reference exceptions (NullReferenceException) appear in the debug console. I'm not sure what exactly triggers this as it only happens sometimes. I have a specific plane this happens on (I've seen it on other crafts as well) which I can tag you on if required.
I'm not sure what you're trying to do, but SelectedWeapon is not a Boolean. You need a Boolean value to use a tertiary selector. Additionally, the second code has invalid syntax.
What is the original goal you are trying to accomplish?
@Kennneth Thanks! Yep, probably. I honestly think I'll devote all of next year to applying newly developed optimizations to the systems instead of releasing it this Christmas.
It was taking off from Tarpley Airfield (aka Wright Airport), flying the old, old P-51 Mustang in orbit view on iOS (this was very soon after SP was released) without understanding how to move the camera, so I was stuck in one position in orbit view.
There are many more memories but this is my first.
Try increasing the mass of the landing gear assembly (in particular the springs and wheels), and fiddling with the wheel traction settings if mass does not fix it.
@TinyMaus I think it actually does lol. Not only is the part count greater than 20,000 parts (I'll do some proper calculations at some point), but many parts are highly complex with many pages of funky trees in a single label.
@TinyMaus I am trying to figure out how to cater to every device type and platform. I don't really talk about it on these progress updates as I don't have much to show right now, but when I post it there will be a massive tree of unlisted versions, such as a simplified flying cockpit for VR.
@XAircraftManufacturer I honestly think it will be.
I've done tons of research, visited many real-life cockpits, talked to several pilots, talked to friends, gotten feedback, and just worked on it for several years in general.
@ILoveAirplanes
- I don't really like side sticks, they give less precision, especially in VR
- I would have to redesign a lot of stuff to figure out how to include it
- I would have to rebuild the seats
- No
@zwen Yeah I've noticed that. I think it's because the SWL-10's ILS "ended" right at the threshold, and yours "ended" at the opposite end of the runway.
@jamesPLANESii For what I'm doing it doesn't really matter, I'm adding switches and lights to stuff and I copy certain values so all switches on a panel have the same height, etc. Back in the simple, fun days (SWL-120 fuselage construction 1.8 years ago), I used the automatic part snapping behavior.
Dragging parts? Never heard of it.
I thought everyone carefully added a part away from the build and used the nudge and part connections tools to add it to the plane.
@32 It's not even that uncommon, as they are the ones doing the curation.
Where's this "proof" you speak of?
+3As someone who recently posted a scripted mod, and wrote a crystal clear pinned comment, I agree.
@ToeTips I have made the logo some time ago but it's not very good quality. You can find it on one of the planes in this list and this list.
@ToeTips I don't have a specific label, unfortunately. The logos in my profile, while being the actual logos, were made at least 5 years ago by someone who just wanted to quickly create a Gravatar image. I have plans to update them at some point, which will likely be when I start work on the liveries.
Yep, this plane has more theoretical parts than the Yamato (plus it has thousands of variables and insanely complex systems).
@ToeTips Sure, you can use any one of the four.
+1About the update, this will not affect the SWL-120 in any way. I have many plans for the future; SP has been the only game I've played in the last few months, and it has been the main game for the last few years. In fact, I've recently ramped up SWL-120 production with more free time.
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes Exactly. I've been working on my SWL-120 for 2 years now, with plans to refine and further improve it next year, and I am still very interested in SP. In fact, it's the only game I've played at all the last few months.
+5Fixed. The switch did not have an interactionType set and therefore couldn't unset the value of the variable.
Send me the plane and I'll have a look
@maddogfike @MADDOGLUCAS @MobileBuilder21 The post literally says they are not adding any more features to SimplePlanes. Asking for updates will get you nowhere.
+2bug
If there is no "cockpit" camera (appears after flyby view) available, using the "previous view" input does not loop continuously. I'm not sure how else to explain it. For example, let's say I have a craft with no custom cameras at all, and the cockpit camera (on the primary cockpit part) set to "disabled". If I press "C", I can continuously cycle through all views forever. However, if I use the keybind "Shift + C" (or any custom ones, like the back side button on my mouse), I get stuck at chase view. If I then enable the cockpit camera or add a custom camera (basically adding a cockpit view camera position), I can cycle backwards continuously.
To sum up the paragraph above,
if there is no default cockpit view, the previous camera input will stop at chase view.bug
If a part outputting to a variable (such as a shock) is destroyed, a bunch of null reference exceptions (
+1NullReferenceException) appear in the debug console. I'm not sure what exactly triggers this as it only happens sometimes. I have a specific plane this happens on (I've seen it on other crafts as well) which I can tag you on if required.I'm not sure what you're trying to do, but SelectedWeapon is not a Boolean. You need a Boolean value to use a tertiary selector. Additionally, the second code has invalid syntax.
What is the original goal you are trying to accomplish?
I think all it does is give the sun a glare when looked at. It may do more than that.
+1@realSavageMan well in that case this plane is even more amazing! Looking forward to the tutorial if it comes out.
+1@ThatRandomCouchPotato The wing tutorial can be found here, I taught @realSavageMan.
@Kennneth Thanks! Yep, probably. I honestly think I'll devote all of next year to applying newly developed optimizations to the systems instead of releasing it this Christmas.
It was taking off from Tarpley Airfield (aka Wright Airport), flying the old, old P-51 Mustang in orbit view on iOS (this was very soon after SP was released) without understanding how to move the camera, so I was stuck in one position in orbit view.
+3There are many more memories but this is my first.
@xiebaiBX What do you mean?
+1Would you still like help for VR testing?
@DatMaluchGuy19 I can't even remember what your question was lol.
Sorry to hear about your fever, it's good to hear you're better.
@DatMaluchGuy19 No, why?
No, although it may be possible with mods.
+2Try increasing the mass of the landing gear assembly (in particular the springs and wheels), and fiddling with the wheel traction settings if mass does not fix it.
+1@RepublicaOfTurboAirliner Thank you
@ToeTips Honestly the moment I saw the words "accident" and "SWL-120" on the same post.
+4@TinyMaus I think it actually does lol. Not only is the part count greater than 20,000 parts (I'll do some proper calculations at some point), but many parts are highly complex with many pages of funky trees in a single label.
+1@TinyMaus I am trying to figure out how to cater to every device type and platform. I don't really talk about it on these progress updates as I don't have much to show right now, but when I post it there will be a massive tree of unlisted versions, such as a simplified flying cockpit for VR.
@XAircraftManufacturer I honestly think it will be.
I've done tons of research, visited many real-life cockpits, talked to several pilots, talked to friends, gotten feedback, and just worked on it for several years in general.
I'd appreciate it if you do not use the SWL-120 for posts like this. Please remove all references to the SWL-120.
+9@TheFlightGuySP I was about to say the same thing
+2Wait what happened?
Labels have a weird bug where they will fight over what to display. There is no known fix aside from using 1 label.
@RepublicOfCursedPlanes Also "subscribe" to every single post you visit by clicking the wifi icon at the top right of the header
+1@ILoveAirplanes
+2- I don't really like side sticks, they give less precision, especially in VR
- I would have to redesign a lot of stuff to figure out how to include it
- I would have to rebuild the seats
- No
@CaptFoxworth19 @klm747klm747 There is technically my tutorial. I was taught by klm.
Fun fact: It'll just display "1 NEW", and that singular notification will tell you how many new comments are on this post.
+1@ILoveAirplanes No
@MrCOPTY Probably lol
+1@Jakeharharhar Read the end of the linked forum post.
+1Part 2 Here
Forum Here
Part 1 Here
Forum Here
@TheEncryptor It's a bot.
@ShinyGemsBro hmm
@zwen Yeah I've noticed that. I think it's because the SWL-10's ILS "ended" right at the threshold, and yours "ended" at the opposite end of the runway.
@ShinyGemsBro Seems weird how no-one downloaded, upvoted, or commented on this though...
0 upvotes, 1 download, 0 spotlights
hmmm
This is weird, also there are two of these...
@jamesPLANESii For what I'm doing it doesn't really matter, I'm adding switches and lights to stuff and I copy certain values so all switches on a panel have the same height, etc. Back in the simple, fun days (SWL-120 fuselage construction 1.8 years ago), I used the automatic part snapping behavior.
@Graingy Yes
Dragging parts? Never heard of it.
+1I thought everyone carefully added a part away from the build and used the nudge and part connections tools to add it to the plane.
Example:
Try pasting that code into this forum.
+2