Can you guys stop fighting? This infighting does nothing but destroy our ability to resist greater threats.
And sorry Dank for giving PINK the pistol to try assassinate you. We heard the assassin took a full 30-round magazine to the chest from an AK-47. Rather publically.
@DankDorito We found out that what matters in a tank vs. tank engagement is who's going to shoot first. Awwami Khalid tanks in the Azores often found themselves limited to certain areas of the terrain, where M4 Scorpions and M8 General Burns were able to engage them successfully with flanking shots into the side of the turret with 90mm railguns. This was because of the superior mobility and stealth of the light tanks. The M8 is the stealthiest tank in the world, and the M4 Scorpion, while not as stealthy, is a low-profile vehicle and has been fitted with some of the upgrades.
As you are operating defensively, you would have the vital first-shot advantage. The Victoria's powerful cannon mean that it has a wider range of areas which to engage from. The heavy armor will favor long-range engagements, where armor is most effective due to the loss of shell velocity. However, at close ranges, the poor traverse of the vehicle compared to modern machines means that it is vulnerable to being outflanked by faster machines. Despite this, it is incredibly difficult to engage and kill a Victoria, and often when a commander must retreat in the face of a pursuing army, they leave behind a concealed Victoria crewed by men and women with nothing to lose in death. The ensuring havoc caused by a lone bogeyman romping behind their lines is sometimes enough to allow a counter-offensive.
But in a head-on fight, the Victoria tanks would win if they could engage at range, and the MBT-2 tanks would need to close the distance in order to get flush shots into the side of a Victoria at 200m.
The rear armor can be penetrated by a flush shot at 500m, however, and this would be the objective.
In the meantime, the Victoria's 155mm M8 coilgun can punch through the upper glacis plate of the MBT-2 at ranges of 3,000m and front turret at 2,500m.
@DankDorito As of now, yes, according to GoldenEagle. Although a bit heavy, very expensive, and not particularly fast compared to other tanks, it is still fairly mobile, has a reliable engine, is very well-armed, has an accurate cannon, and is incredibly tough. Despite the greater reliability, easier maintenance, and high mobility of the Ardent, tank crews prefered the Victoria simply because they know that if they're inside the toughest thing on the battlefield.
Several other names for this tank include "Vicky" with most crews (a variation being "Vicky Six" to distinguish it from the M5A5, or "Vicky Five") and "girlfriend for three" (the previous Victoria tanks used "girlfriend for four" due to the use of a manual loader), "Luby" ("dear") or "kochanie" ("darling") by Polish crews, or "Zulfaqir" (Muhammad's legendary sword, conceptually similar to Excalibur in terms of power) and "Khalid" ("immortal" in Arabic, later known as "Sahih Al-Khalid" or "true immortal" to distinguish it from the Awwami Khalid tank) by North African crews.
It was also known by its name Victoria in other languages, such as "Wiktoria" in Polish and "Faykturia" in Arabic.
In the meantime, religious leaders in Paternia are exempt from tax, although may not pursue commercial ventures or directly receive profits from it. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Ground clearance is very low though, and there is no commander's cupola.
This means the commander, if forced to operate buttoned-up (hatches closed), will have terrible visibility over the battlefield.
Ironically, our tank commanders don't use them a lot, because they prefer to operate with hatches open whenever possible. They only close hatches if there is nuclear, biological, or chemical contamination on the battlefield.
I think he refers to "abolishing dhimmi system" because the process of attempting to proclaim superiority of Islam and the caliphate is really pissing people off. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Without a constitution, the power of government becomes unchecked. There is no framework on the set limits of the caliphate.
The rulers, with no reference or checks, will be destroyed by the corruption a high concentration of power, for power, in sufficiently high quantities (such as that of a monarch in an absolute monarchy) will corrupt, just like a drug.
@GoldenEagle I find this palatable, and shall accept it without condition. I assume that said release of territory is to be unconditional, which is standard procedure in territorial exchange unless said territory has been gained via conquest.
I always wanted Paternia to be the jewel of the Pacific, with Honolulu a diamond set in the emerald isles of Hawaii upon the sapphire waters of the Pacific. The Paternian triangle symbolizes the Polynesian Triangle, with Hawaii its northern corner, New Zealand its southwest corner, and Easter Island its southeast corner. However, we have no claims to New Zealand.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation What do you think of GoldenEagle's proposal below?
|
|
V
@Liquidfox Managed to disable the base mesh (so it would resemble an unpowered rotator) and then XML'd it via FineTuner mod to make it wide and flat. Then I stuck it to a fuselage piece made to fit more or less flush with the wings, and then stuck a standard three-spot pylon on it.
What I mean is with the first point, if I leave, there will be no counterbalance to your power, and you'll bully everyone into submission. When we cede territory to our allies, it is unconditional, for we know that with kindness and fairness, we can assure loyalty.
The second point is valid because we fight to avenge those who feels that they have been wronged by Awwam, but because of your military might, has no voice. In contrast, you chose to start a war instead of trying to clear up a misunderstanding.
The third point is what I'm trying to bring about.
Your cooperation is necessary for this reform to come about. Otherwise, I shall allow you to prove my first point. I will calmly observe, and then propose reform once again.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation There's a few ways I see this RP is going to go:
1) I leave, Awwam takes over the whole world, the RP stagnates, and the RP ends because nobody wants to be Awwam's biatch.
2) Paternia and Awwam keep fighting until everyone on God's Earth is dead, everyone leaves because they want no part in sabre rattling with superpowers, and the RP ends.
3) We partition the mega-states (Paternia and Awwam) into many nations of lesser power, leave Paternia and Awwam as rump states, end the toxic sabre rattling, let the river of time wash away the toxins and heal the wounds, and have a far more dynamic inter-nation dialogue, and this RP continues until GoldenEagle gets bored of it and wants to move on, where someone will certainly adopt it and take it in a new direction.
New members have to scrounge for scraps of land, if they can find any reasonable bit of real estate. As a Catholic, I accept suffering as a part of life. However, as a Catholic, I must do what I can to help those who suffer.
Many of these new members side with me because they see you with half the prime real estate in the world while they have some place best described as "middle of nowhere".
Do not be selfish, and hog prime real estate so you can get high off power while half a dozen new users can barely make a living in niche territories, and make these landless participants your slaves. I do not know what exactly the Koran says about selfishness, but given what I know about what other major world religions say about selfishness, it can't be good.
I know you are a good person at heart. I believe that people are inherently good at heart, until things like greed, lust, and hatred fill their minds.
Do it for the good of everyone. I am ready to cede all my American territories south of the US-Mexico border when you are ready to break up Awwam.
You have my word. I have already ceded my Alaskan holdings to the Walrus Alliance, and the dispute over Canada will be irrelevant if we make it a free territory. RMark1 can have the Australia he wants.
And maybe, people will forgive you.
@GoldenEagle Please support this petition. It is for the greater good of the community.
@DeezDucks But still, I suppose that the honorable Conqueror GC driver (because arty redeems themselves in my eyes if they stand and fight instead of committing suicide by means of lake, cliffside, or self-inflicted splash damage) felt vaguely cheated that a shell that deals 2200 damage, has 117mm of armor pen, and has a 7.76m blast radius (or 11.10m blast radius with skill rounds) only blows off the tracks of a tank with 173hp (the amount I had at the time) and 25mm of armor.
One one part, I want to laugh at him, but on the other hand, I feel sorry that RNGesus cheated him of victory.
@DeezDucks Yep. I suppose they're only shooting at you because there's nothing else to shoot at and they know that if light tanks get anywhere near them and they miss their shotgun, it's rectal exam time, with the light tank playing doctor.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation I simply found the chat between our nations to be incredibly toxic, on both sides. And I'm also calling for the cessation of Paternian territories as well as Awwami territories to new players whose nations are the size of a dozen pixels on the map.
I think Awwam should be made a Sultanate under @Supermini555 or @tanklovers, a South Pacific power, centered in Indonesia, Brunei, and Malaysia. After all, the Sultan of Brunei is one of the richest world leaders, alongside the President of the UAE and the King of Saudi Arabia because they feed America's oil addiction, and America pays them well.
The EAC should definitely be re-formed under your rule, and comprise of its territories in Iran, Arabia, Levant (except for Israel) and maybe Anatolia. There, you can rule as the Islamic caliphate you always wanted to have, with happy people because unlike Europe, India, China, Korea, and Southeast Asia, they actually want Sharia.
The rest of the countries? Let them be independent! They have their own rich and wonderful cultures, and we have known that the Awwam governance in China has become Chinese, as to their surprise, the Chinese people were already familiar with the concept of Islam. So while Chinese Muslims were undoubtedly put in positions of power, they tended to follow traditional Chinese law, because that is what they know, and that's what the people know.
Give them to all the other members of Awwam and let them have their own governments, to avoid another RMark1 incident. You can still be friends with them. After all, the US Government (a secular liberal democracy) and Saudi Monarchy (an Islamic absolute monarchy) are real BFFs. Mostly because Saudi Arabia feeds America's ego by selling them oil and letting them stick their military bases there so they can show off those guns to Iran (which both of then don't really like). And America returns the thanks by selling Saudi Arabia the guns they're flashing to Iran. And by guns, I mean tanks, missiles, and fighter jets. And of course, actual guns
In the meantime, we'll find takers for our Mexican, Central American (except for Panama) and South American territories. New players with little or no territorial holdings will have preference to those spots.
Although today, I survived a hit from a Conqueror GC in a Walker Bulldog and didn't take any hull damage.
Just, lost my tracks.
I said at the beginning that I got SerB's joke (Tier 10 match, Tier 7 light tank, Himmelsdorf). But I suppose it goes both ways. He'a arty on Himmelsdorf, although the Conqueror GC is one of the better arty to be in because your shells drop in at steep angles.
But I suppose only splashing the tracks off of a Walker Bulldog in artillery is a joke of its own right, as the grace of St. Jingles the Mighty made it miss. And then made half my shots bounce off the Conqueror GC because it's built off the chassis of a Conqueror heavy tank, complete with the hull armor. But I still got him. So that's good. @DeezDucks
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation And yet they did.
I suppose Japanese High Command said "If we can make the biggest battleship, we can make the biggest tank."
To which the engineers asked "How?" and Japanese High Command said "We put a Yamato on tank tracks." To which the engineers said "Sounds good!"
Trust me, in the PC World of Tanks, they stuck this in the game as a Tier 6 tank.
I suppose Wargaming logic went like this:
"The KV-2 isn't broken at all. I suppose slapping a hundred tons of armor plate on the front AND back and giving it a bigger engine so it can go as fast as a KV-2 isn't going to be game-breaking."
I mean, seriously. This thing had 150mm of front AND rear armor, set at a sharp and steep slope. The sides are 75mm, however.
And then they do this too:
"I also think that we should make this balanced for Tier 5 by making it a KV-1 that can go 40kph and giving it a gun with 135mm of armor pen and 300 alpha damage."
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Look, take some responsibility. Even if I were to be neutral in the conflict with the NFK, you still would have taken Western Europe, Korea, and China, which you did anyways.
In my opinion, we did not start this. You did. And we decided to stand by our friends. The NFK may have made aggressive overtures, but it was because of a misunderstanding. The ball was in your court to determine the lives of millions. And you decided that instead of de-escalating the situation through words in order to clear up a simple misunderstanding, you decided to make it your casus belli and invade, setting the precedent of a constant state of war and mistrust.
You set the precedent to the continuous expansion of Awwam. And I naturally saw this as a threat to Paternia, and devoted the nation's energies to halting the Awwami hordes.
@jsaret Rambo pops up with an M60 I did. Terminator pops up with a minigun Me too. Robocop pops up as himself Same here. Master Chief pops up as himself Did that too.
@PINK Just try establish air control over the places that need to be defended. The F-7 is fast and agile, and any pilot who can take off, perform basic aerobatic maneuvers, and land without crashing an F-7 is a pilot worth more than their weight in gold.
@PINK Just try establish air control over the places that need to be defended. The F-7 is fast and agile, and any pilot who can take off, fly a circuit, and land without crashing is a pilot worth more than their weight in gold.
@PINK @PyrusEnderhunter I no longer believe Dank is a liability to our cause.
He can be very helpful.
@PINK @DankDorito @PyrusEnderhunter
Can you guys stop fighting? This infighting does nothing but destroy our ability to resist greater threats.
And sorry Dank for giving PINK the pistol to try assassinate you. We heard the assassin took a full 30-round magazine to the chest from an AK-47. Rather publically.
@DankDorito We found out that what matters in a tank vs. tank engagement is who's going to shoot first. Awwami Khalid tanks in the Azores often found themselves limited to certain areas of the terrain, where M4 Scorpions and M8 General Burns were able to engage them successfully with flanking shots into the side of the turret with 90mm railguns. This was because of the superior mobility and stealth of the light tanks. The M8 is the stealthiest tank in the world, and the M4 Scorpion, while not as stealthy, is a low-profile vehicle and has been fitted with some of the upgrades.
As you are operating defensively, you would have the vital first-shot advantage. The Victoria's powerful cannon mean that it has a wider range of areas which to engage from. The heavy armor will favor long-range engagements, where armor is most effective due to the loss of shell velocity. However, at close ranges, the poor traverse of the vehicle compared to modern machines means that it is vulnerable to being outflanked by faster machines. Despite this, it is incredibly difficult to engage and kill a Victoria, and often when a commander must retreat in the face of a pursuing army, they leave behind a concealed Victoria crewed by men and women with nothing to lose in death. The ensuring havoc caused by a lone bogeyman romping behind their lines is sometimes enough to allow a counter-offensive.
But in a head-on fight, the Victoria tanks would win if they could engage at range, and the MBT-2 tanks would need to close the distance in order to get flush shots into the side of a Victoria at 200m.
The rear armor can be penetrated by a flush shot at 500m, however, and this would be the objective.
In the meantime, the Victoria's 155mm M8 coilgun can punch through the upper glacis plate of the MBT-2 at ranges of 3,000m and front turret at 2,500m.
@1gman4evr LOL
@PINK You forgot about the NFK's territorial holdings in Cuba! They're still around!
@Supermini555 Of the tanks with working suspension, only the Victoria series and the XM20 features them.
I may incorporate it into a remaster of the Ardent tank.
@1gman4evr We see it.
@HackingAnonymous lol
@DankDorito As of now, yes, according to GoldenEagle. Although a bit heavy, very expensive, and not particularly fast compared to other tanks, it is still fairly mobile, has a reliable engine, is very well-armed, has an accurate cannon, and is incredibly tough. Despite the greater reliability, easier maintenance, and high mobility of the Ardent, tank crews prefered the Victoria simply because they know that if they're inside the toughest thing on the battlefield.
Several other names for this tank include "Vicky" with most crews (a variation being "Vicky Six" to distinguish it from the M5A5, or "Vicky Five") and "girlfriend for three" (the previous Victoria tanks used "girlfriend for four" due to the use of a manual loader), "Luby" ("dear") or "kochanie" ("darling") by Polish crews, or "Zulfaqir" (Muhammad's legendary sword, conceptually similar to Excalibur in terms of power) and "Khalid" ("immortal" in Arabic, later known as "Sahih Al-Khalid" or "true immortal" to distinguish it from the Awwami Khalid tank) by North African crews.
It was also known by its name Victoria in other languages, such as "Wiktoria" in Polish and "Faykturia" in Arabic.
The Hellkeska and the Pummeler are two very different kinds of attack aircraft.
The Pummeler was designed for tactical support of ground forces and survive on its maneuverability and durability.
The Hellkeska is designed to strike heavily defended areas and survive on its speed and electronics.
If we wanted to blow up a column of tanks firing on our position, we would use a Pummeler.
If we wanted to blow up a column of tanks, we'd use a Pummeler.
If we wanted to blow up a column of tanks defended by fighters and advanced air defenses, we'd use A-4B Cobra and A-8 Hawk II.
If we wanted to blow up those tanks in a heavily defended depot a hundred miles behind the shooting, we'd use this. @DankDorito
Thanks! @503rdAirborneSoldier
That's a start.
In the meantime, religious leaders in Paternia are exempt from tax, although may not pursue commercial ventures or directly receive profits from it. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Cool suspension though.
Neat.
Ground clearance is very low though, and there is no commander's cupola.
This means the commander, if forced to operate buttoned-up (hatches closed), will have terrible visibility over the battlefield.
Ironically, our tank commanders don't use them a lot, because they prefer to operate with hatches open whenever possible. They only close hatches if there is nuclear, biological, or chemical contamination on the battlefield.
I think he refers to "abolishing dhimmi system" because the process of attempting to proclaim superiority of Islam and the caliphate is really pissing people off. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Yep. @GoldenEagle
@Liquidfox Thanks!
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Without a constitution, the power of government becomes unchecked. There is no framework on the set limits of the caliphate.
The rulers, with no reference or checks, will be destroyed by the corruption a high concentration of power, for power, in sufficiently high quantities (such as that of a monarch in an absolute monarchy) will corrupt, just like a drug.
@GoldenEagle I find this palatable, and shall accept it without condition. I assume that said release of territory is to be unconditional, which is standard procedure in territorial exchange unless said territory has been gained via conquest.
I always wanted Paternia to be the jewel of the Pacific, with Honolulu a diamond set in the emerald isles of Hawaii upon the sapphire waters of the Pacific. The Paternian triangle symbolizes the Polynesian Triangle, with Hawaii its northern corner, New Zealand its southwest corner, and Easter Island its southeast corner. However, we have no claims to New Zealand.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation What do you think of GoldenEagle's proposal below?
|
|
V
@GoldenEagle Sounds good! You're the boss.
So, what's the solution?
@Liquidfox I suppose.
However, I just did this out of more of a "why not try this?" sort of thing.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation See what I mean?
|
|
V
@Liquidfox Managed to disable the base mesh (so it would resemble an unpowered rotator) and then XML'd it via FineTuner mod to make it wide and flat. Then I stuck it to a fuselage piece made to fit more or less flush with the wings, and then stuck a standard three-spot pylon on it.
@Spikerya @1918 It's... it's...
Beautiful. Beautiful in its own special way.
It reminds me of the Pummeler.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
What I mean is with the first point, if I leave, there will be no counterbalance to your power, and you'll bully everyone into submission. When we cede territory to our allies, it is unconditional, for we know that with kindness and fairness, we can assure loyalty.
The second point is valid because we fight to avenge those who feels that they have been wronged by Awwam, but because of your military might, has no voice. In contrast, you chose to start a war instead of trying to clear up a misunderstanding.
The third point is what I'm trying to bring about.
Your cooperation is necessary for this reform to come about. Otherwise, I shall allow you to prove my first point. I will calmly observe, and then propose reform once again.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation He can think for himself.
At least I try to make a point.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation We only fight when provided the opportunity because we feel Awwam is OP and want to deliver the nerfbat.
And @ErvenDynamics has no interest in surrendering allegiance to you.
@GoldenEagle I think this is necessary for the longevity of the C&C RP.
@DankDorito No problem!
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation There's a few ways I see this RP is going to go:
1) I leave, Awwam takes over the whole world, the RP stagnates, and the RP ends because nobody wants to be Awwam's biatch.
2) Paternia and Awwam keep fighting until everyone on God's Earth is dead, everyone leaves because they want no part in sabre rattling with superpowers, and the RP ends.
3) We partition the mega-states (Paternia and Awwam) into many nations of lesser power, leave Paternia and Awwam as rump states, end the toxic sabre rattling, let the river of time wash away the toxins and heal the wounds, and have a far more dynamic inter-nation dialogue, and this RP continues until GoldenEagle gets bored of it and wants to move on, where someone will certainly adopt it and take it in a new direction.
I suggest doing the third option.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Look.
You occupy half of the whole world.
New members have to scrounge for scraps of land, if they can find any reasonable bit of real estate. As a Catholic, I accept suffering as a part of life. However, as a Catholic, I must do what I can to help those who suffer.
Many of these new members side with me because they see you with half the prime real estate in the world while they have some place best described as "middle of nowhere".
Do not be selfish, and hog prime real estate so you can get high off power while half a dozen new users can barely make a living in niche territories, and make these landless participants your slaves. I do not know what exactly the Koran says about selfishness, but given what I know about what other major world religions say about selfishness, it can't be good.
I know you are a good person at heart. I believe that people are inherently good at heart, until things like greed, lust, and hatred fill their minds.
Do it for the good of everyone. I am ready to cede all my American territories south of the US-Mexico border when you are ready to break up Awwam.
You have my word. I have already ceded my Alaskan holdings to the Walrus Alliance, and the dispute over Canada will be irrelevant if we make it a free territory. RMark1 can have the Australia he wants.
And maybe, people will forgive you.
@GoldenEagle Please support this petition. It is for the greater good of the community.
@DeezDucks But still, I suppose that the honorable Conqueror GC driver (because arty redeems themselves in my eyes if they stand and fight instead of committing suicide by means of lake, cliffside, or self-inflicted splash damage) felt vaguely cheated that a shell that deals 2200 damage, has 117mm of armor pen, and has a 7.76m blast radius (or 11.10m blast radius with skill rounds) only blows off the tracks of a tank with 173hp (the amount I had at the time) and 25mm of armor.
One one part, I want to laugh at him, but on the other hand, I feel sorry that RNGesus cheated him of victory.
@DeezDucks Yep. I suppose they're only shooting at you because there's nothing else to shoot at and they know that if light tanks get anywhere near them and they miss their shotgun, it's rectal exam time, with the light tank playing doctor.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation I simply found the chat between our nations to be incredibly toxic, on both sides. And I'm also calling for the cessation of Paternian territories as well as Awwami territories to new players whose nations are the size of a dozen pixels on the map.
I think Awwam should be made a Sultanate under @Supermini555 or @tanklovers, a South Pacific power, centered in Indonesia, Brunei, and Malaysia. After all, the Sultan of Brunei is one of the richest world leaders, alongside the President of the UAE and the King of Saudi Arabia because they feed America's oil addiction, and America pays them well.
The EAC should definitely be re-formed under your rule, and comprise of its territories in Iran, Arabia, Levant (except for Israel) and maybe Anatolia. There, you can rule as the Islamic caliphate you always wanted to have, with happy people because unlike Europe, India, China, Korea, and Southeast Asia, they actually want Sharia.
The rest of the countries? Let them be independent! They have their own rich and wonderful cultures, and we have known that the Awwam governance in China has become Chinese, as to their surprise, the Chinese people were already familiar with the concept of Islam. So while Chinese Muslims were undoubtedly put in positions of power, they tended to follow traditional Chinese law, because that is what they know, and that's what the people know.
Give them to all the other members of Awwam and let them have their own governments, to avoid another RMark1 incident. You can still be friends with them. After all, the US Government (a secular liberal democracy) and Saudi Monarchy (an Islamic absolute monarchy) are real BFFs. Mostly because Saudi Arabia feeds America's ego by selling them oil and letting them stick their military bases there so they can show off those guns to Iran (which both of then don't really like). And America returns the thanks by selling Saudi Arabia the guns they're flashing to Iran. And by guns, I mean tanks, missiles, and fighter jets. And of course, actual guns
In the meantime, we'll find takers for our Mexican, Central American (except for Panama) and South American territories. New players with little or no territorial holdings will have preference to those spots.
Ah, yes. Sky cancer.
Although today, I survived a hit from a Conqueror GC in a Walker Bulldog and didn't take any hull damage.
Just, lost my tracks.
I said at the beginning that I got SerB's joke (Tier 10 match, Tier 7 light tank, Himmelsdorf). But I suppose it goes both ways. He'a arty on Himmelsdorf, although the Conqueror GC is one of the better arty to be in because your shells drop in at steep angles.
But I suppose only splashing the tracks off of a Walker Bulldog in artillery is a joke of its own right, as the grace of St. Jingles the Mighty made it miss. And then made half my shots bounce off the Conqueror GC because it's built off the chassis of a Conqueror heavy tank, complete with the hull armor. But I still got him. So that's good. @DeezDucks
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation And yet they did.
I suppose Japanese High Command said "If we can make the biggest battleship, we can make the biggest tank."
To which the engineers asked "How?" and Japanese High Command said "We put a Yamato on tank tracks." To which the engineers said "Sounds good!"
Trust me, in the PC World of Tanks, they stuck this in the game as a Tier 6 tank.
I suppose Wargaming logic went like this:
"The KV-2 isn't broken at all. I suppose slapping a hundred tons of armor plate on the front AND back and giving it a bigger engine so it can go as fast as a KV-2 isn't going to be game-breaking."
I mean, seriously. This thing had 150mm of front AND rear armor, set at a sharp and steep slope. The sides are 75mm, however.
And then they do this too:
"I also think that we should make this balanced for Tier 5 by making it a KV-1 that can go 40kph and giving it a gun with 135mm of armor pen and 300 alpha damage."
Two patches later they nerfed them. HARD.
@PINK Decent machine.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Look, take some responsibility. Even if I were to be neutral in the conflict with the NFK, you still would have taken Western Europe, Korea, and China, which you did anyways.
In my opinion, we did not start this. You did. And we decided to stand by our friends. The NFK may have made aggressive overtures, but it was because of a misunderstanding. The ball was in your court to determine the lives of millions. And you decided that instead of de-escalating the situation through words in order to clear up a simple misunderstanding, you decided to make it your casus belli and invade, setting the precedent of a constant state of war and mistrust.
You set the precedent to the continuous expansion of Awwam. And I naturally saw this as a threat to Paternia, and devoted the nation's energies to halting the Awwami hordes.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@DankDorito I'm not planning on bombing your factories. @PINK is.
He is doing this without my direct support.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation I just want to hug it!
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation If you wish to know, we used pistons on the wheels for elevation control.
@TemDesBur That's under @PINK's jurisdiction.
@DankDorito I'm not shooting at you. PINK is. I'm just sitting back and watching the fireworks.
On the other hand, the F-7s we delivered and the one's you built are doing incredibly well.
@horatio @PyrusEnderHunter Just my idea.
@horatio Don't worry about me. We're the Arsenal of the Free World.
@jsaret Rambo pops up with an M60 I did.
Terminator pops up with a minigun Me too.
Robocop pops up as himself Same here.
Master Chief pops up as himself Did that too.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation On less serious matters, we can agree this plane is soooo cute!
@PyrusEnderhunter Great. Show him to my F-7. I want his opinion on that plane.
A plane so unstable that when it comes to the best pilots in the world, God would rank second place to anyone who can fly an F-7.
@PINK Just try establish air control over the places that need to be defended. The F-7 is fast and agile, and any pilot who can take off, perform basic aerobatic maneuvers, and land without crashing an F-7 is a pilot worth more than their weight in gold.
@PINK Just try establish air control over the places that need to be defended. The F-7 is fast and agile, and any pilot who can take off, fly a circuit, and land without crashing is a pilot worth more than their weight in gold.