It was in the M14. Chrome-lining the chamber and bore was requested by the Army but the advisers of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger aka the"Whiz kids" who were basically "by the numbers" computer nerds, declined this, since the Army had previously made attempts to slow down introduction of the rifle in service and believed that it was not necessary as Eugene Stoner did not include it in the original rifle. @PyrusEnderhunter
As long as you use them as an interceptor in good weather.
The accident rates of users who used it as an interceptor (Japan, ROC, Italy, and Spain) were very low in comparison to those who used it as a fighter-bomber (Canada, W. Germany).
Japan, of its 200-250 aircraft, lost three.
Spain, in 17,000 flight hours, didn't lose any.
The loss rate of the Italian Air Force F-104 was a pretty average for fighters, and lower than the loss rate in US service.
The reason why the Germans and Canadians lost so many F-104s is because they took an airplane with high wing loading, made it even higher, and flown it in crappy weather at low altitudes with anything less than an experienced pilot. @PINK
@JackTheBestBoss Not at all. It's perfectly safe.
I'm in Hawaii.
Close enough. @ColonelStriker
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation ...
M16 production is operating at full capacity. We can license production, although it will require CNC milling. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation I can review this vehicle after I remaster the M6A4.
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation Belkan Kalashnikovs are cheap.
Gotcha. 400,000 M16A1 rifles coming up. @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
I don't think a Brit will say that about someone else's tank.
Nice tank though.
At least the commander can now see outside the tank without having to pop open the hatch.
"Hua Long," or "Fire Dragon," seems like a good name.
I think you should use Chinese names for ROC aircraft.
So, 1940's or now? @marcox43
It was in the M14. Chrome-lining the chamber and bore was requested by the Army but the advisers of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger aka the"Whiz kids" who were basically "by the numbers" computer nerds, declined this, since the Army had previously made attempts to slow down introduction of the rifle in service and believed that it was not necessary as Eugene Stoner did not include it in the original rifle. @PyrusEnderhunter
@Supercraft888 Ehhh...
My interest is in real firearms, not necessarily those exclusive to the realm of fiction.
@PyrusEnderhunter This IS a real firearm.
What era is this tank supposed to be in?
Gotcha. @Supermini555
@Supercraft888 NP!
@Supercraft888 Correct!
Not everyone knows who Bill is.
Five upvotes for the first person who can recognize what game I am referrencing in the description.
@YuukaNeko @GoldenEagle @PINK
Sure! @MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
Sure! I prefer to keep RP interactions from more personal interactions.
But I'm still not giving back the former SNAS. @Sniper16
Yep. All my creations are designed for high physics. @Supermini555
I was able to do so on mobile and on PC. @Supermini555
Thanks! @PyrusEnderhunter
@Spikerya Indeed.
@PINK Fixed.
@PINK Noted.
As mentioned, it was reasonable.
@PINK It was.
@JakeTheDogg @PyrusEnderHunter
They're perfectly safe to fly.
As long as you use them as an interceptor in good weather.
The accident rates of users who used it as an interceptor (Japan, ROC, Italy, and Spain) were very low in comparison to those who used it as a fighter-bomber (Canada, W. Germany).
Japan, of its 200-250 aircraft, lost three.
Spain, in 17,000 flight hours, didn't lose any.
The loss rate of the Italian Air Force F-104 was a pretty average for fighters, and lower than the loss rate in US service.
The reason why the Germans and Canadians lost so many F-104s is because they took an airplane with high wing loading, made it even higher, and flown it in crappy weather at low altitudes with anything less than an experienced pilot. @PINK
Want F-104s?
@Mellons Cool!
Turn the Pummeler into paper plane. @Mellons
The Pummeler. Any one of them.
@SteadfastComing
@Feanor @DankDorito @bjaco @SteadfastComing
@InternationalAircraftCompany Non-functional elevator.
@MadBomber
@Kimo
@DestinyAviation
@MemeKingIndustriesAndMegaCorporation
@Liquidfox
@Supermini555
@Treadmill103
@InternationalAircraftCompany
@Feanor
@NativeChief1492
@DankDorito
@Dllama4
@PINK
@bjac0
@SteadfastContracting
And a new welded turret. @MadBomber
M6A4 uses 120mm cannon. @MadBomber
Cool! I may have to trial this against the M6A4.
@HackingAnonymous I mean to say "prop" engines.
@EEVEEK1NG Master the use of fuselage blocks. The resizable ones. It'll look much better and be easier to work with.
Lol @Verterium
It's ad hominem.
Unfortunately, I was unable to respond to Sniper16's post due to him blocking me.
However, I can say that I am a determined individual. I want something, I work to getting it.
I also enjoy writing and discussions. Which means I love to bend words. I'm also considering something in law.
His rant is filled with logical fallacies too.
Lovely project! However, I think I can help improve your designs.
I have done something like this, except the engines came in different power multipliers and did not include prop engines.