@CaptainNoble Not talking about how I see you. But re-read all this, I never put any negative connotation on anything. Only you introduced it, bud. Just putting up a warning. Whoever reads this whole convo again will question your replies more. I did my part expressing my opinions as opinions. I'm serious about the warning part.
But fine, let's just cap this situation up and call it a day. GGs.
@CaptainNoble
A 737 from an A340 is pretty easy since they're.. somewhat different. Moreso for a 380 and 747.
Are those even supposed to be difficult bud? Cuz otherwise you're just starting to become one emotional wreck and waste of time.
Like I'm not even pissed anm. Genuinely asking did your younger brother our cousin or whatever get a hold of your acc? If they did ftr I have this in record to cover for you.
Because no matter what angle you look at this from, you're making a bad image for yourself.
@CaptainNoble Same is subjective. It implies several levels of "same".
Congrats to you if you can distinguish them, bud. But as a good number of people in this comment section said they're fundamentally the same.
You should give me a lobotomy if I'm somehow unable to distinguish a 747 from a 380 lmao.
But for now, with your argument, I apologize, but you're not permitted to give me a lobotomy.
Astro12:: "This does not make civil aviation less interesting in itself, but for someone who does not delve into the details, it will be less noticeable."
@CaptainNoble Exactly this.
Call civilian aircraft boring or whatever you want. That doesn't make them bad. They have less features but that doesn't mean they're nothing. That's just that. Black and white.
I just happened to find myself more interested in military craft.
Plus, you're already in the "making it sound" part. I never said anything explicitly stating civilian craft are boring. I just said that they're more monotonous compared to fighters.
Firstly, tell that to the A320, A220, A340, A350, A321 NEO, B737, 767, etc., etc. I'm sure you get my point. Most modern designs are monotonous. They only change designs when their roles are significantly different, like international and regional. I never said that was a bad thing. I just said that they mostly looked the same.
You're the one who gave it negativity, lmao
Plus, relatively, yes. Compared to commercial airliners, I do think military craft are much more of an engineering marvel. Why do you ask? Shit man.. I guess it's because they were built to do more. That's a fact.
And yeah, I do think military aircraft are cooler. So what if I stated it like a fact? I wasn't pushing it, no? I just said that they're badass, and now that's.. bad.. somehow?
Give yourself a check before putting negative meanings to everything.
People have different opinions and feelings, I'm sure you can agree.
Simply speaking, combat vehicles are the absolute pinnacle of aerospace engineering. They're designed to reach and break the limits of their predecessors and very often have very varied, interesting designs, which is in stark contrast to commercial aircraft like airliners, which all mostly look the same and are monotonous.
Plus, military crafts have many more roles than commercial crafts, look much more visually appealing (as I've mentioned), have much more kick, and let's be honest here, much more badass.
Sort of like sports cars to city buses.
@YarisSedan Quite a while from now but not too long lol
In fact, the design I posted here is heavily outdated. I've made several new iterations completely from scratch. Some have a functioning elevator, while others have larger bases, flare systems, and so on.
I even tried to add a CIWS system, but SP is too buggy for that kind of stuff.
@LettuceRob119 eh
Burnt out, no inspiration, abandoned by someone I thought I liked
The sort
But then I saw the dogfight challenge and was like ain't no way am I gonna let this happen without me
Lmao
@YishFish42 hm.
+1And where are you geographically located on the simpleplanes archiapelago
@MetallicBeef6572 freakin million dollar question lmao
@SilverTheDogfighter perfekt
@YishFish42 teehee
+1cutely develops new CAS craft
I think East Krakaboa could do me well
That includes Yeager, yeah?
@MetallicBeef6572 I think he was a bot too lol
@KorKaiorWhatever pog
+2@SEPAHIRAN136 im pretty sure promoting your stuff on other peoples stuff on this site isn't allowed.
+2Also T
+1Publish
+1Fun as hell shooting everyone else down lol
+1@LordFarquaad I'll just shamelessly post my video explanation here lol.
Nothing too complicated, CLICK HERE
@LordFarquaad you don't have thumbnails so your stuff ends up looking not interesting
How did you make that thumbnail? (gorgeous btw)
+1@orsonvance67 eat jet fuel, bot
That's alotta variants
+1@BluesynVN @OoooP
Nah I was joking that this was the japanese flag cuz I rlly don't know which flag this was
T?
"Hey, buddy, still alive?"
Fullcream ToT
+1Firstly, why is this so clean ToT
Secondly, what even is simpleplanes anymore lmao
T
@Bigolfishboy Do you have a link to some of em?
Damn I love Japan
+2"But when the world needed him most, he vanished"
+2I absolutely love this design
@Vincent
I'd like to update the server desc of GJ if possible
I'll contact you on discord soon for it too:]
@AirNK it actually very impressive ngl
+1I mean it looks like an F-35 withought a usual tail section and cockpit, but that in itself is pretty cool
@CaptainNoble Not talking about how I see you. But re-read all this, I never put any negative connotation on anything. Only you introduced it, bud. Just putting up a warning. Whoever reads this whole convo again will question your replies more. I did my part expressing my opinions as opinions. I'm serious about the warning part.
But fine, let's just cap this situation up and call it a day. GGs.
@CaptainNoble
A 737 from an A340 is pretty easy since they're.. somewhat different. Moreso for a 380 and 747.
Are those even supposed to be difficult bud? Cuz otherwise you're just starting to become one emotional wreck and waste of time.
Like I'm not even pissed anm. Genuinely asking did your younger brother our cousin or whatever get a hold of your acc? If they did ftr I have this in record to cover for you.
Because no matter what angle you look at this from, you're making a bad image for yourself.
@CaptainNoble Same is subjective. It implies several levels of "same".
Congrats to you if you can distinguish them, bud. But as a good number of people in this comment section said they're fundamentally the same.
You should give me a lobotomy if I'm somehow unable to distinguish a 747 from a 380 lmao.
But for now, with your argument, I apologize, but you're not permitted to give me a lobotomy.
Oh hell yeah
+4Honestly it looks like those wings would be a pain to strut irl
but who cares it looks badass lol
Astro12:: "This does not make civil aviation less interesting in itself, but for someone who does not delve into the details, it will be less noticeable."
@CaptainNoble Exactly this.
Call civilian aircraft boring or whatever you want. That doesn't make them bad. They have less features but that doesn't mean they're nothing. That's just that. Black and white.
I just happened to find myself more interested in military craft.
Plus, you're already in the "making it sound" part. I never said anything explicitly stating civilian craft are boring. I just said that they're more monotonous compared to fighters.
@CaptainNoble you sound pissed lol.
Firstly, tell that to the A320, A220, A340, A350, A321 NEO, B737, 767, etc., etc. I'm sure you get my point. Most modern designs are monotonous. They only change designs when their roles are significantly different, like international and regional. I never said that was a bad thing. I just said that they mostly looked the same.
You're the one who gave it negativity, lmao
Plus, relatively, yes. Compared to commercial airliners, I do think military craft are much more of an engineering marvel. Why do you ask? Shit man.. I guess it's because they were built to do more. That's a fact.
And yeah, I do think military aircraft are cooler. So what if I stated it like a fact? I wasn't pushing it, no? I just said that they're badass, and now that's.. bad.. somehow?
Give yourself a check before putting negative meanings to everything.
People have different opinions and feelings, I'm sure you can agree.
Simply speaking, combat vehicles are the absolute pinnacle of aerospace engineering. They're designed to reach and break the limits of their predecessors and very often have very varied, interesting designs, which is in stark contrast to commercial aircraft like airliners, which all mostly look the same and are monotonous.
+2Plus, military crafts have many more roles than commercial crafts, look much more visually appealing (as I've mentioned), have much more kick, and let's be honest here, much more badass.
Sort of like sports cars to city buses.
@winterro Now this I can agree with
T
+1The drag point count is disgustingly perfect just like this thing lol
+2Pardon
The F what
+1@YarisSedan Quite a while from now but not too long lol
+1In fact, the design I posted here is heavily outdated. I've made several new iterations completely from scratch. Some have a functioning elevator, while others have larger bases, flare systems, and so on.
I even tried to add a CIWS system, but SP is too buggy for that kind of stuff.
@CatdogAerospace this one?
@CatdogAerospace waitwhat
I don't remember giving anyone access to this one
KSB9000
+1(It's over 9000)
So close yet so far AA
@Kingsman472 hell yeah
I think the eyes need to be bigger ToT
@LettuceRob119 yeah it iz what it iz sometimes
+1ty fam
@LettuceRob119 eh
+1Burnt out, no inspiration, abandoned by someone I thought I liked
The sort
But then I saw the dogfight challenge and was like ain't no way am I gonna let this happen without me
Lmao
@PlaneFlightX ahh
@YarisSedan naa dont worry abt it homie
all good