I know a few solutions, but none of them are particularly pretty:
-remove the spring in the landing gear if there is one
-decrease the wheel traction
-just straight up forgo the use of custom landing gear and just use stock ones
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "error"
@GuyFolk reverse engineered from this
working to make it a "bolt-on" system (it could be put on any aircraft with little to no modification) and to make it more stable and responsive
@GuyFolk surprised that someone can do it while manually controlling their plane
mostly because I found it hard enough that just automating the process via reverse engineered FT code I found was much easier
@hpgbproductions F R O G
frog
you guys are lagging?
whaaaaat
is this?
Nice
+1nice
this scary
+3this kind of stuff isn't my cup of tea
+1but good job i guess
Nice
@Th3rmoplylae the missile is self mapping
@pedro16797 yes we are
@pedro16797 i don't even know who you are
But hello
@SkylineAero as I said
"None of them are pretty"
XFA-22C Velociraptor MkV.vi
+1I know a few solutions, but none of them are particularly pretty:
-remove the spring in the landing gear if there is one
-decrease the wheel traction
-just straight up forgo the use of custom landing gear and just use stock ones
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "error"
+6comic sans
+1might i suggest the benelli m4 as a solution
never heard of this one
+1Looks interesting
looks nice
+1@MarbleXLazuli you're welcome
@AWESOMENESS360 this is the speed of fast
+1guy
so let me get this straight
+1You're trying to create your own cult?
@BeastHunter do you play simpleplanes on a rock?
+2@BeastHunter to me
+3that's still playable
for real
EVEN FURTHER BEYOND
+4And this is to go
+5Ayo
Now this is more my style
@9specter528 I'm this plane's maker
I feel the same way
First
@LieutenantSOT SR-100 Aurora
@Axartar you're welcome
nice
@OtakuNekoToT
+2well the joke is not as funny as it used to be
this radiates 2018 energy
+4this comments section uneases even the likes of me
+6ayo I know this plane
@Ruvien0Republic0Engineer oh my good god
@tsampoy bruh
what in the crud
think the warp from 40k
yoink
أمبولانس
@GuyFolk reverse engineered from this
working to make it a "bolt-on" system (it could be put on any aircraft with little to no modification) and to make it more stable and responsive
oh sweet holy jesus
why
nice
+1@GuyFolk surprised that someone can do it while manually controlling their plane
mostly because I found it hard enough that just automating the process via reverse engineered FT code I found was much easier
so is this supossed to be another op tank?