25.6k Mustang51 Comments

  • Mustang51 5.6 years ago

    @Zanedavid well you are very welcome!

  • Grumman F-14E Tomcat 5.6 years ago

    Wonderful build! It looks and flies absolutely fantastic

  • Lightning Aircraft Industries TI-85 'The Silver Phantom' 5.6 years ago

    Great looking aircraft! I love the bomb bay

  • Highest rated for downloads and points 5.6 years ago

    @ND40X it would be nice to see them implemented

  • Air defense missile 5.6 years ago

    Nice build! Will it accidentally shoot down a 737-800 though?

  • Boeing B-101 (Jet B-29) 5.6 years ago

    @Jordano13 thanks! Feel free to leave an upvote :)

  • Trintess YJ-80 Sweeping Sparrow Mod.2 5.6 years ago

    @Brencool35 that’s odd then. Sometimes planes download weird

  • Trintess YJ-80 Sweeping Sparrow Mod.2 5.6 years ago

    Looks pretty good. Flight characteristics aren’t the best but it still does feel like a more plausible aircraft than the last one. Nice job!

  • Trintess YJ-80 Sweeping Sparrow 5.6 years ago

    @Brencool35 no problem!

  • Not political 5.6 years ago

    @Subnerdica ahhh fair enough

  • Not political 5.6 years ago

    Did you tag me in something before?

  • Trintess YJ-80 Sweeping Sparrow 5.6 years ago

    The overall shape is pretty nice! I love those missile pods and the exhaust looks good. The wings however are a bit too thick and the flat rear side makes them feel blocky. The engine intake also looks too small. It would look a lot better if it had the sort of nose intake that either the MiG-19 had or the super sabre. I think the mig one would look better on it but the sabres would look fine too. Overall though I do like it!

  • B-27 Heavy Tank 5.6 years ago

    @Iliketobreakthegame whoops didn’t see that. Try making your own maybe. It will probably fit the rest of the tank better

  • RJ-Grumman Viper F6 2.8 5.6 years ago

    I love it!

  • Trintess V-37 Divebird 5.6 years ago

    @Brencool35 yeah they’re not too fun to make. You have to just make sure it gets progressively smaller. That’ll help a lot

  • Trintess V-37 Divebird 5.6 years ago

    I really like the front half of this aircraft but the rear is too boxy. It should at least get a fair bit thinner but it should do so progressively, not all at once as it does right before the tail. Pretty good job though

  • B-27 Heavy Tank 5.6 years ago

    It’s okay but the turret is basically just the one on the jackhammer

  • Dive Bomber 2.0 5.6 years ago

    @Iliketobreakthegame lol you can just tag me in it

  • VC10 5.6 years ago

    @Tang0five oh man I remember when you had to make a fuselage thin, then add a wing or some other part, and then make it thick again to make it fit in smoothly. No wonder I was a terrible builder back then hahaha

  • cat 5.6 years ago

    Very impressive and creative build. Lovely work!

  • VC10 5.6 years ago

    @Tang0five was this a large build? I’ve only ever done it to fighter jets and they seem to perform fine but I did add a lot of air breaks

  • [IBIS] TB-07 Dessert Lion 5.6 years ago

    @Diloph hahaha that happens

  • PC-93 Lodus 5.6 years ago

    Very nice build!

  • [IBIS] TB-07 Dessert Lion 5.6 years ago

    @Diloph lol what? Hahaha

  • B-20A Aerofortress 5.6 years ago

    @Diloph lol I really don’t know hahaha. I’m also surprised by it

  • RicarJet G-1/A StormHawk 5.6 years ago

    @RicardoAs1515 no problem buddy!

  • [IBIS] TB-07 Dessert Lion 5.6 years ago

    @Diloph sure thing buddy! I have my username in my SP profile bio

  • My Second Attempt With Homeade Control Serface 5.6 years ago

    @Ineedhelp no problem buddy!

  • B-wing VB (Vtol version) 5.6 years ago

    @Mumpsy of course! I tried to give everyone their prizes as fast as I could

  • Socrux S. Ca. 132 Ciclone (45-50 NAC) 5.6 years ago

    @FlyingHueman you deserve it though! Your builds were really fantastic!

  • VC10 5.6 years ago

    @Tang0five have you tried reducing the drag? That’s often a huge reason for it. I think drag points cause even more lag than part count

  • Mitsubishi A6M2-N "Rufe" (France) 5.6 years ago

    @Trijets no problem!

  • Results for Naval Aviation Challenge 5.6 years ago

    @Omel probably will but not for a while. It won’t be either of those things though?

  • [IBIS] TB-07 Dessert Lion 5.6 years ago

    @Jokowi if you make a sort of cross shape with fuselage blocks and make one the exact length of the aircraft and one the width it helps a lot :)

  • VC10 5.6 years ago

    @Tang0five I haven’t really tried a serious airliner apart from my really old Dash 8. Maybe I should give it a go after I finish the 3-4 builds I’m currently working on actually. I think I have more than enough experience now. Also I’ve never tried lower case letters for a reason hahaha. Those curves are way too hard and there’s too many. How many parts can your iPad handle?

  • [IBIS] TB-07 Dessert Lion 5.6 years ago

    @Jokowi oh nice! You should make sure the blueprint is the correct size before you start using it. It helps a lot

  • [IBIS] TB-07 Dessert Lion 5.6 years ago

    Nice one! It reminds me of a short tornado

  • Focke-Wulf Fw 242U Verägerter Narwal (real cannons) 5.6 years ago

    @Mumpsy no problem!

  • Vought F4U-4M Ver.2 Corsair 5.6 years ago

    @Mumpsy of course!

  • VC10 5.6 years ago

    Lol I probably got carried away with the upvotes though. I was glad you had plenty of aircraft to choose from which were actually great and upvote worthy hahaha

  • VC10 5.6 years ago

    @Tang0five well I only made my first insignia which bends around a cockpit the other day but I’m pretty happy with it. If you’re wondering if I’d be able to make that lion, I’m going to say I probably couldn’t do it very well. If that part is too hard, just a golden circle would be fine lol. With lettering though I’m pretty good

  • F-16 Block 52 5.6 years ago

    It’s not the best but definitely not the worst. This build is old so you probably know how to fix it but just in case, you gotta move that CoM quite a bit forwards which you can do by adding weight to the front and lowering it at the rear, or by moving the CoM for individual parts using XML. Also I highly recommend reducing the drag to less than 1000 points if you can.

  • Fairey Gannet Style 5.6 years ago

    @Quazal16 no problem!

  • MiG-AI 5.6 years ago

    @ssenmodnar for an AI aircraft, it’s probably just best to add the stock wheels yourself. It uses little parts and it works fine

  • MiG-AI 5.6 years ago

    Nice build! Great compromise between parts and looks/performance

  • McDonnel Douglas F2H-1 Banshee 5.6 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 no problem!

  • Socrux S. Ca. 132 Ciclone (45-50 NAC) 5.6 years ago

    So I’ve upvoted all your aircraft but you still need around 8 more upvotes. If you would like I can just upvote your new posts or I can spotlight a few aircraft of your choosing. It will take a few days to do that but it’s probably the better option

  • Socrux S. Ca. 132 Ciclone (45-50 NAC) 5.6 years ago

    And here are your results for this final build!
    Design: 18/20
    Functionality: 9/10
    Performance: 10/15
    Build quality: 15/15
    Paint scheme: 4/5
    Personal opinion 5/5
    Overall: 61/70 (6 upvotes!)

  • Vought F6U Pirate 5.6 years ago

    And here is the result for this one!
    Design: 13/20
    Functionality: 9/10
    Performance: 12/15
    Build quality: 9/15
    Paint scheme: 2/5
    Personal opinion 4/5
    Overall: 40/70 (4 upvotes!)

  • Mitsubishi A6M2-N "Rufe" (France) 5.6 years ago

    Here are your results for this!
    Design: 13/20
    Functionality: 8/10
    Performance: 7/15
    Build quality: 10/15
    Paint scheme: 3/5
    Personal opinion 4/5
    Overall: 45/70 (4 upvotes!)