25.6k Mustang51 Comments

  • VB-9 Cortex 5.8 years ago

    I was confused why there was that one Boom 50... now it makes sense

  • De havilland vampire 5.8 years ago

    @Boe132 for custom paint, you just choose the custom paint pallet hahaha. For symbols, well you either have to make them yourself (which can be really annoying) or search for them from someone who has previously made a symbol parts kit

  • Lightning Aircraft Industries LT-6A Panther 5.8 years ago

    @ND40X great! Sounds cool already

  • Multi-fuselage Aircraft Challenge 5.8 years ago

    This sounds interesting. I might make something for this too. The part count is just a little tricky to stick to

  • DF 198 5.8 years ago

    Well this looks a little peculiar. I like your ambition though! Twin aircraft are quite cool and fun to make

  • Lightning Aircraft Industries LT-6A Panther 5.8 years ago

    @ND40X that already sounds awesome! Tag me in it when you post. I also hope you can find an XML modded rotator or make one yourself so that it will constantly turn the radar dish (if it is one which uses the radar dish that is)

  • Space Shuttle orbiter 5.8 years ago

    It’s not the exact shape but it looks like a somewhat more futuristic space shuttle with smaller wings. Quite a cool design

  • vary ugly plane 5.8 years ago

    It might not be the prettiest but you still made your own cockpit! That’s a great habit to get into. I still cannot make good ones integrated with my builds

  • JM-2 Banshee 5.8 years ago

    @Joelthealien no problem! It’s on its way there, it just needs a little bit more to be great

  • Lightning Aircraft Industries LT-6A Panther 5.8 years ago

    @ND40X I’m looking forward to that!

  • Lightning Aircraft Industries LT-6A Panther 5.8 years ago

    This is very nice! The cockpit looks really good and the general shape is nice too. The one thing I would change is make the nose cone a little more rounded.

  • The Stuff 2.0 5.8 years ago

    @Joelthealien thanks man! I really appreciate it. I’ve looked everywhere and I couldn’t find a single one

  • JM-2 Banshee 5.8 years ago

    This is a really nicely made UAV! It has a really cool shape to it. The only thing I would make at all differently is the shape of the front. It looks a little better when it’s a little thicker, especially on a UAV such as this one.

  • HEATER 5.8 years ago

    Lol I like this. It looks good

  • The Stuff 2.0 5.8 years ago

    @Joelthealien would you take an XML request? I would love to have scaled down wings of different sizes which have a control surface which works on VTOL to create flaps. Do you think you could do this? No worries if it’s too much trouble

  • The Stuff 2.0 5.8 years ago

    Some of these are pretty useful btw

  • The Stuff 2.0 5.8 years ago

    Did you XML mod these yourself?

  • De havilland vampire 5.8 years ago

    Pretty good! I agree with the comment below. This is tough plane as one of your firsts and you did alright. I would focus on getting the proportions correct on the aircraft as well as the proper shape. If you have a diagram of the plane you’re trying to build on hand, it really helps. Nice job still for one of your firsts!

  • Mitsubishi J9M7 Hagetaka 5.8 years ago

    @HighPitch1998 oh cool! I thought maybe a vixen or venom but that makes sense too

  • F/A-18 - Ejército del Aire 5.8 years ago

    Whoa this is really really well made! Nice job with this one!

  • Mitsubishi J9M7 Hagetaka 5.8 years ago

    Damn this is a really cool build idea. Did any aircraft in particular inspire you or was this from your own imagination?

  • WIAF F-39 ''HellCat'' 5.8 years ago

    This looks pretty cool. It seems like more of a modern trainer or light attack aircraft than a WWII fighter though hahaha. Nice sleek design

  • Fairlady F-401A 5.8 years ago

    @XxHELLCAT2GOOD4UxX I will take a look at it

  • Northrop F-5 5.8 years ago

    @TheKraken3 the flight controls are actually fairly realistic compared to most on this website. Usually planes are too manoeuvrable but yours has a fairly realistic turn rate and it’s not overly smooth. The weight of the aircraft is also fairly realistic which is a bonus. It’s very well done

  • IN-20 Anpogaki 5.8 years ago

    @JamesBleriot it looks slightly like it’s influenced by the PB4Y liberator (not the B-24 variant) but it’s clearly a different aircraft. Why be a bad sport about it?

  • Northrop F-5 5.8 years ago

    This flies really well and looks incredible. Great build!

  • Socrux S.CC-1 Uranus 5.8 years ago

    @FlyingHueman that’s really odd. When I turn the pitch control surface’s trim to “on” (not inverted), it works just as it should. Sometimes planes work slightly differently for different devices though so this could be the reason

  • Socrux S.CC-1 Uranus 5.8 years ago

    @FlyingHueman why not add the trim to the pitch control surfaces?

  • IN-20 Anpogaki 5.8 years ago

    My goodness this is fantastic! Did you base it off any bomber in particular or more than one?

  • Socrux S.CC-1 Uranus 5.8 years ago

    @FlyingHueman yeah it’s not an easy type of plane to build. You did a great job of it though! Some trim tabs would help fly a little easier but that’s not too big a deal. I like the curving of the wing that you did though. You don’t see that on flying wings too often

  • Socrux S.CC-1 Uranus 5.8 years ago

    This is really really nice! You probably know I’m a sucker for flying wings and this one is bloody good!

  • McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet 5.8 years ago

    @weebabyseamus thanks for that! I’m looking forward to see the changes/improvements you’ve made

  • FW 44 Stieglitz 5.8 years ago

    Exceptional build. The detailing, especially on the wings and cockpit, is just fantastic

  • Fairlady F-401A 5.8 years ago

    This is a really nice aircraft! It’s also probably for the best that the previous comment was removed hahaha

  • Lykins Rattler Mk.iv 5.8 years ago

    This is a pretty nice looking build! The VTOL design is also pretty cool and it’s different that the whole wing moves instead of just the engine. I’m not the biggest fan of the third engine but overall this is super cool!

  • Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero 5.8 years ago

    @RASEN1914 Excellent! Your WWI builds are my favourite of yours thus far so I am looking forward to seeing more of them.

  • Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero 5.8 years ago

    @RASEN1914 no problem buddy! Your builds are incredible and I’m really looking forward to seeing more. Tag me in it when you post it so that I can see it for sure! Any hint on what it is?

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 5.8 years ago

    @TrislandianAlliance lol then why make a fool of yourself? It’s childish

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 5.8 years ago

    @belugasub gotta defend facts

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 5.8 years ago

    @TrislandianAlliance my guy you didn’t read what I said. Go back and look and then you will see that I said the MiG-31 could bit the MiG-25 couldn’t. using your eyes

  • SUKHOI-114 5.8 years ago

    @Alpha1M no problem!

  • SUKHOI-114 5.8 years ago

    This is really fantastic! The detail in this is superb and most of all, it looks like it could have really been a Soviet fighter jet. Most of the fictional planes I see look realistic to some degree but you aren’t surprised they were fictional. With this one, I actually had to double check whether this was built or not. It flies very well too. Reminds me somewhat of a Soviet F-14. Lovely build!

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 5.8 years ago

    @LockheedLover the true air speed of mach 3.5 depends on the altitude as mach number depends on air pressure. The cruise speed of the SR-71 at 85,000 ft (it’s normal cruise altitude) is around 3,500kmh while the MiG-25 cruises around 2,500kmh but I’m not sure at which altitude. Both aircraft can certainly go faster than their cruise speeds but especially for the MiG-25, this is extremely damaging for the engines and even borderline dangerous. Also the true top speed of the SR-71 is unknown as it was not tested beyond certain speeds due to uncertainty over what would happen to the airframe. Another point about the MiG-25 altitude is that although it has gone higher than an SR-71 before, it could not sustain that altitude for long, thus the cruise speed and altitude of the SR-71 is superior. Besides, the missiles used by the MiG-25 were essentially inoperable around the cruise altitude of the blackbird and the MiG-25 never successfully intercepted an SR-71 although they have tried. History has other points to say on this matter.

  • MiG-42 (Twin 21) 5.8 years ago

    @LockheedLover yeah but that was really pushing it’s engines. Normally it was around 2.5 at altitude and the SR-71 cruises at mach 3.5. It also did have both an altitude and aerodynamic advantage to the MiG-25. However, the 31 was able to somewhat intercept it so it repelled the Americans from flights directly over the USSR but not around it.

  • Ad-1 Skyraider (Unfinished) 5.8 years ago

    @SuperSabre1945 looking forward to seeing the finished build! Tag me in it when it’s done

  • RamboJutter Victorious B2A 3.5 5.8 years ago

    Damn this is an incredible build. I wish this was real

  • ADFX-02 Morgan -PIXY- TLS 5.8 years ago

    This is a really cool concept. It looks really good and flies well too

  • C-65 Odyssey 5.8 years ago

    You just got yourself a new follower!

  • F/A-18E Super Hornet 5.8 years ago

    Really incredible job. Fantastic Super Hornet!

  • Avro 686 “Liverpool” 5.8 years ago

    This is so cool! I’ve never seen a build like this!