25.6k Mustang51 Comments

  • VC10 6.0 years ago

    @Tang0five I haven’t really tried a serious airliner apart from my really old Dash 8. Maybe I should give it a go after I finish the 3-4 builds I’m currently working on actually. I think I have more than enough experience now. Also I’ve never tried lower case letters for a reason hahaha. Those curves are way too hard and there’s too many. How many parts can your iPad handle?

  • [IBIS] TB-07 Dessert Lion 6.0 years ago

    @Jokowi oh nice! You should make sure the blueprint is the correct size before you start using it. It helps a lot

  • [IBIS] TB-07 Dessert Lion 6.0 years ago

    Nice one! It reminds me of a short tornado

  • Focke-Wulf Fw 242U Verägerter Narwal (real cannons) 6.0 years ago

    @Mumpsy no problem!

  • Vought F4U-4M Ver.2 Corsair 6.0 years ago

    @Mumpsy of course!

  • VC10 6.0 years ago

    Lol I probably got carried away with the upvotes though. I was glad you had plenty of aircraft to choose from which were actually great and upvote worthy hahaha

  • VC10 6.0 years ago

    @Tang0five well I only made my first insignia which bends around a cockpit the other day but I’m pretty happy with it. If you’re wondering if I’d be able to make that lion, I’m going to say I probably couldn’t do it very well. If that part is too hard, just a golden circle would be fine lol. With lettering though I’m pretty good

  • F-16 Block 52 6.0 years ago

    It’s not the best but definitely not the worst. This build is old so you probably know how to fix it but just in case, you gotta move that CoM quite a bit forwards which you can do by adding weight to the front and lowering it at the rear, or by moving the CoM for individual parts using XML. Also I highly recommend reducing the drag to less than 1000 points if you can.

  • Fairey Gannet Style 6.0 years ago

    @Quazal16 no problem!

  • Ilyushin IL-58 (1945-1950 Naval Challenge) 6.0 years ago

    @AircraftoftheRedStar no problem!

    +1
  • MiG-AI 6.0 years ago

    @ssenmodnar for an AI aircraft, it’s probably just best to add the stock wheels yourself. It uses little parts and it works fine

  • MiG-AI 6.0 years ago

    Nice build! Great compromise between parts and looks/performance

  • McDonnel Douglas F2H-1 Banshee 6.0 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 no problem!

  • Socrux S. Ca. 132 Ciclone (45-50 NAC) 6.0 years ago

    So I’ve upvoted all your aircraft but you still need around 8 more upvotes. If you would like I can just upvote your new posts or I can spotlight a few aircraft of your choosing. It will take a few days to do that but it’s probably the better option

  • Socrux S. Ca. 132 Ciclone (45-50 NAC) 6.0 years ago

    And here are your results for this final build!
    Design: 18/20
    Functionality: 9/10
    Performance: 10/15
    Build quality: 15/15
    Paint scheme: 4/5
    Personal opinion 5/5
    Overall: 61/70 (6 upvotes!)

  • Vought F6U Pirate 6.0 years ago

    And here is the result for this one!
    Design: 13/20
    Functionality: 9/10
    Performance: 12/15
    Build quality: 9/15
    Paint scheme: 2/5
    Personal opinion 4/5
    Overall: 40/70 (4 upvotes!)

  • Mitsubishi A6M2-N "Rufe" (France) 6.0 years ago

    Here are your results for this!
    Design: 13/20
    Functionality: 8/10
    Performance: 7/15
    Build quality: 10/15
    Paint scheme: 3/5
    Personal opinion 4/5
    Overall: 45/70 (4 upvotes!)

  • McDonnel Douglas F2H-1 Banshee 6.0 years ago

    Here are the results for this entry!
    Design: 12/20
    Functionality: 7/10
    Performance: 10/15
    Build quality: 8/15
    Paint scheme: 3/5
    Personal opinion 4/5
    Overall: 44/70 (4 upvotes!)

  • Socrux S. Ca. 162E Super Marreco (45-50 NAC) 6.0 years ago

    Here is the result for this entry! This one was really fantastic. One of my favourites
    Design: 18/20
    Functionality: 8/10
    Performance: 11/15
    Build quality: 14/15
    Paint scheme: 4/5
    Personal opinion 5/5
    Overall: 60/70 (6 upvotes!)

  • F-13 banshee 6.0 years ago

    Here is the result for this entry!
    Design: 6/20
    Functionality: 5/10
    Performance: 7/15
    Build quality: 4/15
    Paint scheme: 2/5
    Personal opinion 3/5
    Overall: 27/70 (2 upvotes!)

    +1
  • I.Ae. 33 Pulqui II (naval) 6.0 years ago

    Here is your result for this aircraft!
    Design: 16/20
    Functionality: 8/10
    Performance: 12/15
    Build quality: 12/15
    Paint scheme: 5/5
    Personal opinion 5/5
    Overall: 58/70 (5 upvotes!)

  • Socrux S. Ca. 162 Marreco (45-50 NAC) 6.0 years ago

    Here is your result for this aircraft!
    Design: 17/20
    Functionality: 7/10
    Performance: 10/15
    Build quality: 13/15
    Paint scheme: 4/5
    Personal opinion 5/5
    Overall: 56/70 (5 upvotes!)

  • FJ-4B Fury 6.0 years ago

    Here is your score for the challenge!
    Design: 13/20
    Functionality: 8/10
    Performance: 9/15
    Build quality: 12/15
    Paint scheme: 4/5
    Personal opinion 5/5
    Overall: 51/70 (5 upvotes!)

  • Achi 12-D 6.0 years ago

    @Jakeisboss you should leave an upvote then hahaha

    +1
  • F-13 Seafly 6.0 years ago

    Here is your score for the challenge:
    Design: 6/20
    Functionality: 4/10
    Performance: 7/15
    Build quality: 6/15
    Paint scheme: 2/5
    Personal opinion 3/5
    Overall: 28/70 (2 upvotes!)

  • Ilyushin IL-58 (1945-1950 Naval Challenge) 6.0 years ago

    Here is your score for this entry!
    Design: 16/20
    Functionality: 8/10
    Performance: 12/15
    Build quality: 10/15
    Paint scheme: 4/5
    Personal opinion 5/5
    Overall: 55/70 (5 upvotes!)

    +1
  • Sweapstreak Sea Sterling F.1 6.0 years ago

    @UnguidedCylinder no problem! This plane was absolutely phenomenal and a pleasure to fly

    +1
  • My first try at homeade control serfaces 6.0 years ago

    @Ineedhelp no problem! If you need more help let me know

    +1
  • Dropheed Systems A-3 SeaThunder 6.0 years ago

    Here is the result for this aircraft!
    Design: 7/20
    Functionality: 7/10
    Performance: 8/15
    Build quality: 10/15
    Paint scheme: 4/5
    Personal opinion 4/5
    Overall: 40/70 (4 upvotes!)

  • F-16 Block 52 6.0 years ago

    How do some of your builds like this one have no upvotes? This is a pretty decent aircraft!

  • Little buster mk.2 6.0 years ago

    And here is the result for this build:
    Design: 5/20
    Functionality: 4/10
    Performance: 3/15
    Build quality: 4/15
    Paint scheme: 2/5
    Personal opinion 2/5
    Overall: 20/70 (2 upvotes!)

    +1
  • VC10 6.0 years ago

    Okay I think that should be all 21 upvotes! If I miscounted please let me know and I’ll add more :)
    By the way, I don’t usually ask for these but I have a build request. Could you make a BAC One Eleven in British Caledonian livery? My grandfather used to work for B Cal and was specifically an engineer for that aircraft and I’ve sadly not seen a good one anywhere on the site. Cheers!

  • vought F4U Corsair 6.0 years ago

    Nice one! The wings are a little too long and should be a bit more forward but other than that good job!

  • stinson L-5 sentinal 1945-1950 Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

    Here is your score for the challenge!
    Design: 4/20
    Functionality: 3/10
    Performance: 4/15
    Build quality: 5/15
    Paint scheme: 2/5
    Personal opinion 3/5
    Overall: 21/70 (2 upvotes!)

  • QAS Mo-7 P 'Griffon' 6.0 years ago

    Here is your result for this entry!
    Design: 16/20
    Functionality: 7/10
    Performance: 12/15
    Build quality: 11/15
    Paint scheme: 4/5
    Personal opinion 5/5
    Overall: 54/70 (5 upvotes!)

  • The Crusader 6.0 years ago

    Here is your result for this entry:
    The Crusader - Verygoodboi (Plane is from outside of timeframe)
    Design: 3/20
    Functionality: 3/10
    Performance: 2/15
    Build quality: 5/15
    Paint scheme: 2/5
    Personal opinion 2/5
    Overall: 17/70 (1 upvote!

  • Boeing PB4B-A Schooner 6.0 years ago

    And here is your result for this:
    Design: 8/20
    Functionality: 5/10
    Performance: 5/15
    Build quality: 6/15
    Paint scheme: 2/5
    Personal opinion 3/5
    Overall: 29/70 (2 upvotes!)

  • AQ7-4N 6.0 years ago

    Here is your score for this entry:
    Design: 13/20
    Functionality: 3/10
    Performance: 8/15
    Build quality: 7/15
    Paint scheme: 2/5
    Personal opinion 3/5
    Overall: 36/70 (3 upvotes!)

  • B-wing VB (Vtol version) 6.0 years ago

    This is an awesome idea. Propellor versions of Star Wars spaceships

  • Focke-Wulf Fw 242U Verägerter Narwal (real cannons) 6.0 years ago

    Here is your result for this entry!
    Design: 11/20
    Functionality: 7/10
    Performance: 8/15
    Build quality: 12/15
    Paint scheme: 3/5
    Personal opinion 4/5
    Overall: 45/70 (4 upvotes!)

  • De Havilland DH.103 Hornet 6.0 years ago

    Here is your result for this entry!
    Design: 16/20
    Functionality: 6/10
    Performance: 8/15
    Build quality: 13/15
    Paint scheme: 4/5
    Personal opinion 5/5
    Overall: 52/70 (5 upvotes!)

    +1
  • My first try at homeade control serfaces 6.0 years ago

    Also the angle which the elevators move is way too high. Try to find the sweet spot but it’s usually between 10-20 degrees

    +1
  • My first try at homeade control serfaces 6.0 years ago

    Not too bad! The plane looks awesome too! The plane looks somewhat like an F-15 and that has an all moving tail. If you use rotators to make the whole thing move it’s both easier and more realistic for this type of plane

    +1
  • Oshkosh M1142 Tactical Fire Fighting Unit 6.0 years ago

    This is awesome! Lovely build!

  • Blue Angels Logo 6.0 years ago

    Now this is beautiful. It looks perfect

  • Sweapstreak Sea Sterling F.1 6.0 years ago

    Here is your score for the challenge!
    Design: 16/20
    Functionality: 9/10
    Performance: 13/15
    Build quality: 14/15
    Paint scheme: 5/5
    Personal opinion 4/5
    Overall: 61/70 (6 upvotes!)

    +1
  • Mig 21 PF-13 Fishbed D 6.0 years ago

    @Trainzo no problem!

  • HMS belfast 6.0 years ago

    @Dominator15 no worries I could understand lol. This was a cool build of it. I really recommend you go see it though! It’s kept fantastically and it’s very unrestrictive compared to American museum ships

  • Mig 21 PF-13 Fishbed D 6.0 years ago

    @Trainzo your welcome! It’s your prize for the score you got in the challenge. It’s going to take so long to give out all the upvotes hahaha

  • 1945-1950 Naval Aviation Challenge 6.0 years ago

    @Trainzo you’re welcome! I really enjoyed this build