Oh, I would of gladly of compared a Tiger against one of those M4 variants, but there appears to be some belief among the more extreme M4 fans that just about any M4 could take on a Tiger and win. Heck, even specialized variants like the (105) and Firefly barely had a chance since the main improvements were towards their guns, while the armor was left practically paper-thin.
Now, there are Jumbos, but they just upped the armor to 100mm. Now, that could bounce the short 88s Tiger 1s had, but against heavier and more dedicated tanks and tank destroyers -such as the Jagdpanther and Tiger 2- they stood no match. annnnd another rant has been had, I must apologize
@Mostly
Well, if a Tiger really wanted to go fast, and with some encouragment by a well known Austrian painter, the Tiger 1 could go upwards of 16mph offroads, so it could probably juuuuust beat the Sherman.
But yeah, that 8,8 cm gun was absolute murder when the Allies came across it.
Odd thing was, the Tiger's gun was originally an AA cannon. The 40's were weird sometimes.
@BACconcordepilot
DarthAbhinov decided to have him kicked (or banned, I'm not quite sure) from SPBC for some childish reason (from what I could tell, Sean didn't pamper Darth like some king)
@KidKromosone
From what I can tell, Andrew Garrison is actually the only one who does stuff for SP, SR 2, etc. (And doesn't sleep, that's important to note)
All the other devs aren't actually devs, and are just around to use as scapegoats if something goes horribly wrong.
I know the whole point of the A.910 MBT is to provide a universal MBT for a modern era, though I personally feel that Soviet-style MBTs don't provide quite adequate protection or firepower for what should be a modern tank, even if it comes somewhat cheaper than Western-style tanks.
I know another point is for member nations to be able to freely modify the A.910, but would it be acceptable for me to provide a semi-official variant to compliment the base MBT that would add upgrade packs found on many Western cast turret tanks?
Mainly I'd like to add blocky addon armor and a main gun compatable with NATO ammo stockpiles, as well as possibly add more complex fire control systems, even if it makes the variant more expensive.
.
Even if the idea of a complimentary variant is unnecessary, its something I'd like to develop when I have the time in the coming month.
Wing surface as in the overall size of the primary wings. What you have looks to not provide enough lift fof the size of the plane, so just stick a large wing in there without ant control surfaces so it doesnt mess with the wings already there.
@GUEVANAERONAUTICS
Sorry about the delay, I don't check the website very frequently.
So I tried downloading your plane and it has a mod thats pretty irrelevant since fuselage slicing was added, I wasn't able to test fly it because of that fuselage bomb bay mod so I can't exactly see what this "bending forward" problem is.
@GUEVANAERONAUTICS
.
Edit: after connecting the pieces together with the connection editor so it doesnt fall apart, it seems that your rear gear are too far forward so the tail collides with the ground and causes weird physics. Not to mention you've got very little wing surface and small elevators for such a heavy aircraft so that would really need to be improved.
I currently have no plans to remake or remaster this tutorial. My priortities are working on various AFVs that are all linked on my bio.
Though when it comes to yaw problems, just make a very large rudder piece with no control surfaces and then scale it down until its almost impossible to see before nudging it into the airframe. It greatly helps with yaw performance. Roll on the other hand, the ailerons really should be on the outermost edges of the wing, and as long as the flying wing isnt terribly wide then control surfaces that cover maybe the outer quarter of the wing should be more than enough. If not, then just nudge several wings with roll control inside each other or make one really big wing and scale it down so it fits inside the wing shape youd like.
@GUEVANAERONAUTICS
They hadnt worked for years because of a bug with links from Imgur. I dont plan on fixing it because of how grossly outdated this tutorial is.
@GUEVANAERONAUTICS
You can use such symbols if used for an aircraft to represent that specific part of Germany's history on a vehicle, historical or fictional, just it's mainly oriented towards stopping people from trying to use it just as shock value or offensive means on vehicles that aren't from prior mentioned part of history.
Oh, right, rotating 45°.
Yeah, I tried that, but it didn't look terribly amazing so I made it like you see now.
And have messed with Tracks 2 quite a bit, even back when it was on mobile, just not very much if anything gets uploaded.
@DragonAerotech
Glad you've enjoyed it so much! And to be honest, not the biggest fan of using other peoples styff usually, but wouldn't hurt to look at those floats when I get the time.
@DragonAerotech
Danke! The fuselage shape took inspiration from the Do 17/217, as well as the Ju 288 (mainly the 288).
+1@Strikefighter04
Tis be some alternative history where -through some magic- Germany pulled through the war with a marginal victory.
+1@Strikefighter04
No probs!
+1@Hyattorama
Oh, I would of gladly of compared a Tiger against one of those M4 variants, but there appears to be some belief among the more extreme M4 fans that just about any M4 could take on a Tiger and win. Heck, even specialized variants like the (105) and Firefly barely had a chance since the main improvements were towards their guns, while the armor was left practically paper-thin.
+1Now, there are Jumbos, but they just upped the armor to 100mm. Now, that could bounce the short 88s Tiger 1s had, but against heavier and more dedicated tanks and tank destroyers -such as the Jagdpanther and Tiger 2- they stood no match.
annnnd another rant has been had, I must apologize
@Mostly
Well, if a Tiger really wanted to go fast, and with some encouragment by a well known Austrian painter, the Tiger 1 could go upwards of 16mph offroads, so it could probably juuuuust beat the Sherman.
+1But yeah, that 8,8 cm gun was absolute murder when the Allies came across it.
Odd thing was, the Tiger's gun was originally an AA cannon. The 40's were weird sometimes.
@BACconcordepilot
Danke, glad you enjoy it
+1@Mustang51
Yeah, pretty much, but, it's understandable why.
+1He's still around on Discord though.
@Awsomur
DarthAbhinov decided to have him kicked (or banned, I'm not quite sure) from SPBC for some childish reason (from what I could tell, Sean didn't pamper Darth like some king)
+1@KidKromosone
Heh, love that idea. Nah, the names given to all these things are unusually very technical, and tell pretty much exactly what they are.
+1@Opise227
Ah, mkayk.
+1@Thederpingmemes
Add .jpeg to the end of the url stuff
+1From what I can tell, Andrew Garrison is actually the only one who does stuff for SP, SR 2, etc. (And doesn't sleep, that's important to note)
+1All the other devs aren't actually devs, and are just around to use as scapegoats if something goes horribly wrong.
Its under aircraft designs.
+1I realized this thing has more parts than my UNSC Savannah...
+1Ahh... the "Russian Helicopter"...
+1Thats neat
@Pilotgoose
Yeah, I barely remember making it. Surprised you've even found it.
@Ryuuishere
Would it be too soon to suggest development of another Universal AFV project?
Something like an APC or IFV would be interesting to develop.
Yes the Leo 2A6 has that arrowhead addon armor, though I'm talking about the Leo 1A6 which has flatter face armor addons.
@Yourlocalhuman
Blocky addon armor in the vein of the Swiss Panzer 2000, the South African Olifant, and the German M48 Super and Leopard 1A6.
@Yourlocalhuman
I know the whole point of the A.910 MBT is to provide a universal MBT for a modern era, though I personally feel that Soviet-style MBTs don't provide quite adequate protection or firepower for what should be a modern tank, even if it comes somewhat cheaper than Western-style tanks.
I know another point is for member nations to be able to freely modify the A.910, but would it be acceptable for me to provide a semi-official variant to compliment the base MBT that would add upgrade packs found on many Western cast turret tanks?
Mainly I'd like to add blocky addon armor and a main gun compatable with NATO ammo stockpiles, as well as possibly add more complex fire control systems, even if it makes the variant more expensive.
.
Even if the idea of a complimentary variant is unnecessary, its something I'd like to develop when I have the time in the coming month.
Wing surface as in the overall size of the primary wings. What you have looks to not provide enough lift fof the size of the plane, so just stick a large wing in there without ant control surfaces so it doesnt mess with the wings already there.
@GUEVANAERONAUTICS
Sorry about the delay, I don't check the website very frequently.
So I tried downloading your plane and it has a mod thats pretty irrelevant since fuselage slicing was added, I wasn't able to test fly it because of that fuselage bomb bay mod so I can't exactly see what this "bending forward" problem is.
@GUEVANAERONAUTICS
.
Edit: after connecting the pieces together with the connection editor so it doesnt fall apart, it seems that your rear gear are too far forward so the tail collides with the ground and causes weird physics. Not to mention you've got very little wing surface and small elevators for such a heavy aircraft so that would really need to be improved.
I currently have no plans to remake or remaster this tutorial. My priortities are working on various AFVs that are all linked on my bio.
Though when it comes to yaw problems, just make a very large rudder piece with no control surfaces and then scale it down until its almost impossible to see before nudging it into the airframe. It greatly helps with yaw performance. Roll on the other hand, the ailerons really should be on the outermost edges of the wing, and as long as the flying wing isnt terribly wide then control surfaces that cover maybe the outer quarter of the wing should be more than enough. If not, then just nudge several wings with roll control inside each other or make one really big wing and scale it down so it fits inside the wing shape youd like.
@GUEVANAERONAUTICS
They hadnt worked for years because of a bug with links from Imgur. I dont plan on fixing it because of how grossly outdated this tutorial is.
@GUEVANAERONAUTICS
I have no interest in making unmodded versions of any of my modded vehicles due to being busy with other projects, sorry.
@alexJgameYTukraine000000
Do both ammo stowages have blowout panels? I dont think I see any modelled on your vehicle.
@DeltaLCR
Is ammo stored in the hull or turret of this? Or is it kept in both?
Nah
@alexJgameYTukraine
StaffelKap#6371
Thanks
@X99STRIKER
Welcome to the old folks club dude
Right looks the nicest imo
You can use such symbols if used for an aircraft to represent that specific part of Germany's history on a vehicle, historical or fictional, just it's mainly oriented towards stopping people from trying to use it just as shock value or offensive means on vehicles that aren't from prior mentioned part of history.
Something that looks vaguely Swedish?
yeah, tell me bouts it
@CrimsonOnigiri
What
Thats just been a bug for years in SP, just don't spam click the undo button and save before mass undoing stuff
What're your opinions on those "Round Moon Conspiracies"?
Sounds pretty dramatic
You don't, probably.
Anyone that says otherwise is secretly a Lunar Communist from Mars
You rite, next version gonna be an actual pancake
@rexzion
I'm pretty sure it just looks like they just reskinned the old solid landing gear for the new wheel.
Basically what did become actual aircraft during the Cold War in some way or another was influenced by German prototype aircraft.
Probably an unlisted RP post has that record
Betcha if you added more deck guns it'll sit more stable during those waves
Oh, right, rotating 45°.
Yeah, I tried that, but it didn't look terribly amazing so I made it like you see now.
And have messed with Tracks 2 quite a bit, even back when it was on mobile, just not very much if anything gets uploaded.
@DragonAerotech
I have it unlisted on my OstP equipment forum, which is linked somewhere on my bio.
@DragonAerotech
Be sure to tag me pls!
Glad you've enjoyed it so much! And to be honest, not the biggest fan of using other peoples styff usually, but wouldn't hurt to look at those floats when I get the time.
@DragonAerotech