41.5k MrVaultech Comments

  • P.020a-128m "Žaneta" 5.4 years ago

    Cause wheel go vroom, track goes (click)
    @JAVLARVAFAN

  • Name of the tank 5.5 years ago

    KanonenJagdpanzer Ausf. A Mit (whatever gun caliber)?

    +1
  • So Today is my Birthday... 5.5 years ago

    I'd steal that.
    Happy bday!

    +1
  • can someone tell me how to make shocks less bouncy? 5.5 years ago

    Increase its damper, probably

  • The Release of the 2020RP Server 5.5 years ago

    That's more than alright, it's quite a big jump going from nothing to a whole country.
    You'd be more than welcome to switch over whenever you feel you're ready though.
    @JAVLARVAFAN

    +1
  • The Release of the 2020RP Server 5.5 years ago

    Alrighty, no need to rush or anything, you have as much time as needed and the invite won't expire.
    @CrashFighter05

  • The Release of the 2020RP Server 5.5 years ago

    Okay, now I think this is everyone.
    @MuffinAerospace
    @JAVLARVAFAN
    @HarrisCraft

  • The Release of the 2020RP Server 5.5 years ago

    I think this is everyone who wanted in...
    But here's the official release peoples
    @Awsomur
    @Aeromen
    @ChiyomiAnzai

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    I'm planning to have it out by tomorrow.
    @JAVLARVAFAN

    +1
  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    Alright. I can mention you somewhere for a Discord link to the server.
    @Theflyingtrex

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    Well, I'm gonna have to ask first if you're absolutely sure you'll want to do this, since you will likely have to spend a good amount of time just moderating the server, and various other, smaller tasks.
    @Theflyingtrex

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    That seems a bit unnecessary for what's planned.
    @JAVLARVAFAN

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    Fandom? You mind explaining some?
    @JAVLARVAFAN

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    Either this Friday, or next Friday. Still having issues getting the bot and rules done.
    @JAVLARVAFAN

  • WIAF Super Fighter 5.5 years ago

    No probs m8.
    @hopotumon

  • Can we talk about this regarding RP posts? 5.5 years ago

    I agree with KDS here, I've made a mess of servers in afternoons, and the only reason 2020's isn't done is because I'm kinda procrastinating and caught up doing other random odd-and-end things around SP.
    Like, I built around 75% of the 2020 server in a single afternoon, it's just getting the rules and bots that took the longest solely because of procrastination.
    Not to mention I spent something like 30-40 hours just on the SLRP server, which itself lasted about 2 1/2 months. That's the time I spent fixing up the server whenever needing and building it over that time
    @MTakach

    +1
  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    That's super good to hear, especially from you!
    @Awsomur

    +1
  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    I'll be sure to keep that in mind if I'm ever in need of a mod, and to mention you on the official release of the server.
    @ChiyomiAnzai

    +1
  • Choose the Cessna! 5.5 years ago

    Where's a neon pink option when you need it?

  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    Thats the benefit of it all, yeah.
    @Mustang51

  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    I wanna say it was something like $60 for a small 3D printed one? Hah, yeah, ridiculous stuff to say the least.
    @Mustang51

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    For being a mod?
    @ChiyomiAnzai

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    Thats sounding pretty wack to say the least.
    Like, I can get why to control what kinda people you want associating with your creation, but that just seems restrictive to the max.
    @HarrisCraft

  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    Ah, right, I've been around since well before that was added.
    I did think about trying it, but at the time ot was around I really didn't have anywhere near enough to afford anything substantial, nor did I have anything built that I felt woulda been quality enough to warrant such an expensive endeavor.
    @Mustang51

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    Don't you also have to be okay'd by the guy who started it just to be able to participate?
    @HarrisCraft

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    Probably.
    I've gotten a few choice members on the preemptive ban list from the server (alongside other unrelated users) who for sure aren't gonna be allowed in server, but most anyone is allowed in as long as they behave and follow the rules.
    @Trollium

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    I'll be sure you're tagged in the official release post of the server.
    @Aeromen

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    In joining mod staff?
    @Aeromen

  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    Hah, I get what you mean. I wanna say quality depends on who you go to for it, really, though who I can't really say.
    @Mustang51

  • Something New to Subscribe to on Discord (an RP) 5.5 years ago

    Glad to hear you like it so far.
    @Awsomur

  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    It would be convenient to have almost anything 3D printed whenever needed.
    And no, I haven't had anything of mine printed. Though, it would be pretty cool if any were.
    @Mustang51

  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    That would be pretty neat for sure, being able to fly any or all of them at any time.
    Though, overall it might end up being tedious getting their shapes and designs right if done via hand.
    @Mustang51

  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    Yeah, aviation does have quite a lot of strange prototypes popping up to test aeronautic designs that someone found strange or might of improved a part of aviation.
    Overall, this design really only would work in SP, and suprisingly makes a half-decent racer aircraft no matter the configuration, as I've found over some years of experimenting.
    @Mustang51

  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    Can agree, would make an interesting experiment for sure. I wouldn't think it would have any improvememts over turbojets, or older motorjets
    @Mustang51

  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    Hah, that's coincidentally the goal of this thing
    @Mustang51

  • Powered Sailplane 5.5 years ago

    No probs m8
    @PlaneBoy3

  • NO U 5.5 years ago

    Nay Thee!

    +1
  • Ju-270 "Spatz" V1 5.5 years ago

    This is definitely a wonderful airframe you've built here, and quite a realistic 1946 design as well.
    Although, I found the emgine a bit underpowered (which I fixed myself alongside a few other small things), it still has a good roll and pitch rate for a late war fighter plane.

    +1
  • P.2002 5.5 years ago

    I completely forgot the Tourney was today, so yeah.
    Either way, good round or try and all that.
    @Strucker

  • [NRPSP] That Server Place I'm In 5.5 years ago

    I wanna say the owner's been banning people who were in IDA from SLRP.
    Though, somehow Aeromen got caught up, so who knows.
    @DeidaraEnterprises

  • Featured aircraft be like 5.5 years ago

    I've noticed this, and I'm gonna be pretty mythed if the Devs removed Features before I even got one.

  • Artillery tank 2.0 5.5 years ago

    Np mate.
    @Shnippy

  • Yak Teaser 5.5 years ago

    Yak? Hah, more like Wak

  • P.07AG-1e Light Recon/Attacker Aircraft 5.5 years ago

    pretty much all this stuff they added, they said they wouldn't add before the game released.
    I can't exactly trust a game that's had so many missteps like this

    @Supernovaboss504

  • Would it be a good idea to reverse the comment sequence on this site? 5.5 years ago

    I wanna say that's how SP worked way back a few years ago, but devs decided to change it to how it is now.
    Really, I've not got a preference, but being able to see the oldest comment first made it easier to catch up to newer comments.

    +2
  • P.07AG-1e Light Recon/Attacker Aircraft 5.6 years ago

    P2W = Pay to win.
    Regardless, the game left me with a pretty poor gameplay impression, and I'm not too keen on returning to it.
    @Supernovaboss504

  • P.07AG-1e Light Recon/Attacker Aircraft 5.6 years ago

    Yeah, I play on PS4, but I'd rather just stick with F4 over 76, especially after hearing about some of the P2W systems Bethesda added, and how broken the economy has been over the past year or two.
    @Supernovaboss504

  • P.07AG-1e Light Recon/Attacker Aircraft 5.6 years ago

    I've just never felt an urge to play past I think it was level 50 on my only account. There were issues with ammo when I had perks pretty much exclusively into guns, anywhere I went was overleveled because of someone being level 100+, or areas had so many enemys on my level that were still overpowered that whatever I found wouldn't be worth it.
    I did enjoy the atmosphere of the dense woods and the ability to build my home in those woods, but always having to deal with an enemy 10 levels above me who could cost me my entire stash of ammo was fun.
    @Supernovaboss504

  • Tank Teaser! [PART 2] 5.6 years ago

    I wanna say one (or more) of the pieces of the mantlet got caught onto the turret when changing over to stabilized if it's unable to move.
    That kinda thing is a pain, but somewhat easy to fix.

  • Alternate WWII History (Addition to SLRP) 5.6 years ago

    I wouldn't exactly say Hitler loved Rommel like you say, but it does make an interesting narrative if any successors of the big mustache himself were realistically incapable of taking up their post as Chancellor for one reason or another, thus forcing the role from any high command Generals over to Erwin Rommel somewhat late in the war.
    but honestly, virtually the entire German Chain of Command would have to be wiped out for Rommel to even somehow gain command...
    @Strikefighter04