Honestly, as far as the KSP ripoff thing, I think it's far from the truth. Why? One tiny thing. Prefab parts. KSP is built around them. There is no customization. Everything does what is does, and nothing else, but SR2? It has customizable fuel tanks, and wings. Instead of having storage containers, it has fuselages and rotators. It leaves so much more freedom than with KSP, and I think it might even be better, but I guess it could be a flop.
It's not KSP.
It's not SP.
SImpleplanes focuses on the aerodynamic physics. SR2? Gravity. In SP, stuff goes up, and stuff goes down. That's how it works. You can't add planets to SP, because it's a flat, infinite plain. It's simply not compatible with space. You'd have to create a whole new game to make planets. And that's what they're doing. They're making another SimpleRockets, not Simpleplanes or KSP.
Sorry for the rant, but I'm quite excited for SR2.
I feel like having the ENTIRE part explode is a bit much. I know that this would be very difficult to do, but making the part explode in pieces would be nice. If that's too hard (It is) they could at least get rid of the explosion spreading to other parts of the plane, and for parts with fuel, they should only be set on fire by the explosion, possibly burning down until they fall off, or just disintegrate, but an explosion is a bit much. Engines can explode, that's fun, but fuselages shouldnt. It would be cool to have a fire spread through the plane instead of, "Hey, your center tank got hit? Heh, three two one, and boom! Say goodbye to both wings!" Missiles and bombs should definitely destroy the plane when hit, and a jammed gun should make a small explosion if tried to fire.
@ALRX
I've been having the same problem, and I've been trying to figure it out. It has something to do with the depthmap cutting off at close distances, when a certain distance from terrain. This correlates with a shadow cutoff too, if you look at the shadows closely they will be cut off at certain areas.
Your contrast is very nice. The drawings stand out on the paper. I would pencil in a few construction lines to help with perspective, but otherwise really great job!
@timurbekzanov
If you are on a phone or tablet, mods cannot be installed. If you are on a computer, double-click on the mod file once downloaded, then enable the mod in the "mods" tab in-game.
@RailfanEthan
Thanks man. I'm definitely looking forward to having some more scenic train maps, though. Driving in a straight line is only so much fun.
The wobbly camera combined with the detailed cockpit and wonderful flight characteristics makes this plane by-far one of the most realistic and fun planes I've ever flown in this game!
@Tarquez
I didn't get it either, really. I watched a video about it and it made a little more sense. I loved the absract ending, even if I didn't get it at first. Really, the fact that I didn't get it is why I love it so much. There's so much information to break down.
"Gosh durn it, Cletus! I told ya ta buy a tractor and ya goes and buys an airaplane."
"Naw trust me!"
+8@Gameboi14
+5F-117
1.8: The Truck Torture Update
+5Everything was going fine till the last pic. XD
+5Honestly, as far as the KSP ripoff thing, I think it's far from the truth. Why? One tiny thing. Prefab parts. KSP is built around them. There is no customization. Everything does what is does, and nothing else, but SR2? It has customizable fuel tanks, and wings. Instead of having storage containers, it has fuselages and rotators. It leaves so much more freedom than with KSP, and I think it might even be better, but I guess it could be a flop.
It's not KSP.
It's not SP.
SImpleplanes focuses on the aerodynamic physics. SR2? Gravity. In SP, stuff goes up, and stuff goes down. That's how it works. You can't add planets to SP, because it's a flat, infinite plain. It's simply not compatible with space. You'd have to create a whole new game to make planets. And that's what they're doing. They're making another SimpleRockets, not Simpleplanes or KSP.
Sorry for the rant, but I'm quite excited for SR2.
+5Is that not how someone normally greets someone in Canada?
+4Please make a mobile friendly version.
+4@Tessemi
+4How to start a war 101:
Watched Porco Rosso a couple months ago so I'm obligated to upvote 20s seaplanes.
+3Extremely disappointed that the pre-order link wasn't a rickroll.
+3Ladies and gentlemen, I have placed the 69th upvote.
+3@communisticbanana
+3seed dead deer
laughs
"Wait is that real?"
Laughs harder
Is this external editing, or in-game post-processing?
+3jamesBlanesii
+3*Supreme Reader
+3@CarsonG1017
+3Q X-Files theme
@RailfanEthan
+3I HAVE ACHIVED SWEET BEANS WORTHINESS
@teodor99
+2It won't, if I have anything to say about it.
Pressing undo and suddenly the plane is in Alaska.
+2@Gestour
+2yAwN
Oof ok lel
No mod requests for me I guess.
@Chancey21
+2If found that STOLs are the only shape of airplane that I can build. :P
@Maxwell1
+2I use bandicam and then crop out the watermark.
Improvise, Adapt, Overcome
RISE OF THE UNDEAD PLANES
+2I feel like having the ENTIRE part explode is a bit much. I know that this would be very difficult to do, but making the part explode in pieces would be nice. If that's too hard (It is) they could at least get rid of the explosion spreading to other parts of the plane, and for parts with fuel, they should only be set on fire by the explosion, possibly burning down until they fall off, or just disintegrate, but an explosion is a bit much. Engines can explode, that's fun, but fuselages shouldnt. It would be cool to have a fire spread through the plane instead of, "Hey, your center tank got hit? Heh, three two one, and boom! Say goodbye to both wings!" Missiles and bombs should definitely destroy the plane when hit, and a jammed gun should make a small explosion if tried to fire.
+2SHUT UP
+2"What is it?" "I built a P-51!" "Where?" "Down there, by Florida" "I can't see it." "Keep looking, it's right by the coast."
+2@BaconAircraft
+2Skidattle Skiday, does anyone browse the fourums specifically for random users' announcements anyway?
Should've used the kidney-bomb instead.
+2I might use that flag sometime. Not on a public post, but I can think of soo many uses.
+2@Seanbon007
+2X-Files Theme plays
@ComradeFedicles
+2They don't even need help! They kill plenty out of starvation on their own!
Devs, don't shoot me!
Awesome plane!
+2@RacingRichard
+2Supposed I keep politics off the site, but no. I'm a proud Trump supporter.
Politics over.
@jamesPLANESii
+1My best guess is something called shadow cascading. Here.
@ALRX
+1I've been having the same problem, and I've been trying to figure it out. It has something to do with the depthmap cutting off at close distances, when a certain distance from terrain. This correlates with a shadow cutoff too, if you look at the shadows closely they will be cut off at certain areas.
Your contrast is very nice. The drawings stand out on the paper. I would pencil in a few construction lines to help with perspective, but otherwise really great job!
+1@timurbekzanov
+1If you are on a phone or tablet, mods cannot be installed. If you are on a computer, double-click on the mod file once downloaded, then enable the mod in the "mods" tab in-game.
@RailfanEthan
+1Thanks man. I'm definitely looking forward to having some more scenic train maps, though. Driving in a straight line is only so much fun.
The wobbly camera combined with the detailed cockpit and wonderful flight characteristics makes this plane by-far one of the most realistic and fun planes I've ever flown in this game!
+1@asteroidbook345
+1Aight let's see
@RailfanEthan
@MrSilverWolf
+1Thanks!
@Chancey21
+1Yeah, I tried. Never looked right. Maybe I'll go back a try again.
"Everybody Wants To Rule The World" plays quietly in the background
+1@Jhantilloto
+1I don't think I can necessarily do a set time, but I can work on it whenever I get the time.
@Jhantilloto
+1Well, now that we've got some more 'final' details about starship, might as well update it to the current version.
You've been busy my dude!
+1Turned out great!
@Tarquez
+1Not gonna lie, I chuckled a bit when I first watched it. Just, "How did I get from a realistic space movie to this?
@Tarquez
+1I didn't get it either, really. I watched a video about it and it made a little more sense. I loved the absract ending, even if I didn't get it at first. Really, the fact that I didn't get it is why I love it so much. There's so much information to break down.
Sounds easy enough, but I'm in school right now. Of you're willing to wait, say, six hours, I could have one ready for you.
+1If all that was left in the Don was beer, then where did the Cooper for the corn that drink and movie wheat come from?
+1