@ChiChiWerx Well if you thought I was saying that then you were saying the same thing in vice-versa. You were basically saying that the P-51 won the war, and the Spitfire didn't do anything. lol
@ChiChiWerx Spitfires paved the way for air superiority over western Europe along with P-47 and P-38 strike missions over German outposts in France and Germany. Other than earlier A-C models of the P-51, which flew over France/Italy in escort missions, The P-51 really didn't see much until there was an open road straight to Berlin, so it is debatable to say that the P-51 was the plane that maintained the air superiority after the ground and air forces of joint-operations made way for allied aircraft straight into germany.
@F104Deathtrap I beg to differ, according to some information I fond the spit was very responsive, agile, and fairly easy to fly. Though, you have a point, the range of the P-51 allowed it to do more than the spitfires at the time could. Unlike spitfires, the P-51 could carry out ground attack missions almost as heavy as P-47s. However, the spit still carried out escort missions over germany, they still did CAS missions, and they modernized and improved a lot in the process, taking up many more roles than the P-51 could, and soon caught up to the P-51 post-war, some versions (Mk 23-24) even surpassing the P-51F. They have their ups and downs. As Awsomur said, they are completely different aircraft for completely different things. The P-51 was simply made to close the gap of escorting problems over europe and the pacific.
The only advantages the P-51 has over the spitfire are speed, range, and service ceiling. The spit flies better, is easier to build, easier to fly, and lighter. P-51 can't really do much compared to the spit
@F4f879 I don't actually have any examples of a wing gun with an accurate representation of a japanese .50 cal, but they are kind of like the italian .50s, they're low velocity, lets say bullet velocity in SP would be around 550-500. Since they are low velocity, they also have low damage. (around 25-45 damage per hit, and quite accurate (spread from 0.9-1.25) with about 6-8 rounds/sec. They use a bright red tracer color like fff0f5, ffe4e1, or ffffff (rgb codes for colors) You can put all of these in the xml codes. I'm currently on mobile so I don't have SP, but that's all the information that you need to make a realistic damage model for your guns.
You can use this information as a template for your gun and tell me how well it works, I'd love to see he result :)
That's just what you want these people to think, you are trying to slowly destroy simplandia from the inside, and mask it as an accident. Your meticulous plans will not stay under cover and innocence forever. >:(
@ChiChiWerx
+1yes lol
smh
+1You forgot the Adidas stripes.
@ChiChiWerx Lol, spits did escort missions over europe many times over, but ok.
+1Also I might check out some of those books, they sound interesting.
@ChiChiWerx Well if you thought I was saying that then you were saying the same thing in vice-versa. You were basically saying that the P-51 won the war, and the Spitfire didn't do anything. lol
+1@ChiChiWerx Spitfires paved the way for air superiority over western Europe along with P-47 and P-38 strike missions over German outposts in France and Germany. Other than earlier A-C models of the P-51, which flew over France/Italy in escort missions, The P-51 really didn't see much until there was an open road straight to Berlin, so it is debatable to say that the P-51 was the plane that maintained the air superiority after the ground and air forces of joint-operations made way for allied aircraft straight into germany.
+1I meant in terms of air superiority @ChiChiWerx
+1Not a fan of that call-sign but this plane is cool
+1@F104Deathtrap I beg to differ, according to some information I fond the spit was very responsive, agile, and fairly easy to fly. Though, you have a point, the range of the P-51 allowed it to do more than the spitfires at the time could. Unlike spitfires, the P-51 could carry out ground attack missions almost as heavy as P-47s. However, the spit still carried out escort missions over germany, they still did CAS missions, and they modernized and improved a lot in the process, taking up many more roles than the P-51 could, and soon caught up to the P-51 post-war, some versions (Mk 23-24) even surpassing the P-51F. They have their ups and downs. As Awsomur said, they are completely different aircraft for completely different things. The P-51 was simply made to close the gap of escorting problems over europe and the pacific.
+1b a n n e d
+1The only advantages the P-51 has over the spitfire are speed, range, and service ceiling. The spit flies better, is easier to build, easier to fly, and lighter. P-51 can't really do much compared to the spit
+1will you make a mechanical rabbit in sp
+1Will you ever get around to making aircraft w/ cosmetic pieces (full-fuselage wings w/ full/partial inner cockpits, custom LGs, etc/)
What was your hardest build so far?
what is your social security number?
+1@F4f879 I don't actually have any examples of a wing gun with an accurate representation of a japanese .50 cal, but they are kind of like the italian .50s, they're low velocity, lets say bullet velocity in SP would be around 550-500. Since they are low velocity, they also have low damage. (around 25-45 damage per hit, and quite accurate (spread from 0.9-1.25) with about 6-8 rounds/sec. They use a bright red tracer color like fff0f5, ffe4e1, or ffffff (rgb codes for colors) You can put all of these in the xml codes. I'm currently on mobile so I don't have SP, but that's all the information that you need to make a realistic damage model for your guns.
+1You can use this information as a template for your gun and tell me how well it works, I'd love to see he result :)
Nice, happy to see you here again :D
+1One question, though, do the .50s have accurate round velocity/damage? That would be pretty cool.
Nice
+1Congrats boi
+1Directed by Wiseau
+1oh dear god...
+1Crusader b, North Korea, Simplelandia...
+1The unholy trinity has arrived.
wtf
+1And only 284 parts, kool
+1@FlyingHonda27 I'll still be active for about a week before I leave tho :0
+1What would you do? Run in the open hallways?
+1reeeeeeeeee
+1-Hanz, what is that sound?
-I don't know...
eeeeeEEEEEEEEEEE
-Oh dear god
EEEEEEEE
You know why they call it 'Driftwood'?
+1Because the suspension is so basic it's as stiff as a log
I'm kidding llama I still love u
You know this is a forum about a plane game, right?
+1Oh baby
+1Fusion between SpaceX and Merso.Corp
+1lol
@Fjorge The unholy trinity
+1Strikes confusion into the enemy as well.
+1Thanks Kanye, very cool
+1lol
+1rip biplane
What the actual hell
+1Is going on
I still don't know
What in god's damned name
Is going on
I give up
Realism
+1OMG HE LIVES IN MAINE REEEEE
+1HE LIVES IN TALLAHASSEE 0w0
Lmao
+1How about no
+1@MOPCKOEDNISHE Oh ok, nice. I can't wait to use it when it comes out! :)
+1Pip pip
+1Tally ho
About time :D
+1@LotusEngineering You know the name of the user for the login? In finder?
+1VODKA VODKA
+1It's crying blood
+1Hope the kraken likes phycology
Train? What train?
+1that's what she said
+1@Strikefighter04
+1You get a traffic cone that you found on the field
then
you put it
on your head.
Wow, this is amazing! Your building style has really evolved and turned for the better.
+1That's just what you want these people to think, you are trying to slowly destroy simplandia from the inside, and mask it as an accident. Your meticulous plans will not stay under cover and innocence forever. >:(
+1@Awsomur EVERYONE DIES MUHAHAHAHA
+1Really cool! I like the cockpit.
+1