The same happened to my ME-262. I gave credit to the person who made the fuselage but even though I changed the cockpit, It came up as a successor.@Squirrel
@Squirrel I deleted the SB-9 and started over. I didn't press 'new aircraft' because I thought if you change the cockpit, it would not longer be a successor of that aircraft. This plane had nothing to do whatsoever from that plane. Nothing was intentionally 'copied' from that plane, but the size of the plane gave some inspiration.. I'll give credit and i'm sorry if I broke the rules but I never intended to have it a successor of any plane in the first place. I'll delete if you want me to.
What I don't get though is how I broke the rules by having the plane similar to yours. I feel like you're saying if someone made a P-51, then someone makes some fictional aircraft with minor similarities for example the size or fuselage shape. It was only when it was a successor they would find/acknowledge the similarities. So I have a question. Had I not made it a successor, would you still think it was a rule-breaker because of minor similarities?
For ME 262s, try putting the wings back a bit more then changing the airfoil to 'symmetric'. It provides minimal lift. It's a hard plane to recreate, try looking at the COT, COM, and COL. Follow them closely and look at the way the wings are built. Sometimes they might be too close together, which means you need to rescale the plane to be bigger.
@Kazin @EpicPigster1 @BaconEggs @BaconAircraft @Sauce @General360 You guys just need to cool it. You guys are just trying to destroy each other by insulting each other's builds.
One, everyone builds in their own way; and there is not anything wrong with that.
Two, Stop being triggered by constructive criticism. It's CRITICISM for crying out loud, it's what is supposed to be said.
Three, if you are making constructive criticism, point out the flaws and say how they can improve it. Don't just walk by and say "I didn't download because it was cool or anything" That's indirectly bragging in many people's perspectives.
Four, stop hating on people below you. Sure you have more points but that does not instantly mean you have the right to hate on them and say it's crap. The community is better than this; I know it, everyone knows it. And if anyone still thinks this is not to end this bickering, I hope you can end it yourselves because you guys are good builders who deserve to work along each other as a whole. Not split each other apart over some sissy-fight about a plane that has some flaws.
@jamesPLANESii Putting the download files into simpleplanes then being able to open the mod after reopening the application. The problem is, it's not from workshop. Does chrome not work with downloads or something?
daaang
After an eternity scrolling through, and getting distracted by so many creations, I found it
Drove up from GA to SC just to see it. 100% worth it :D
@Brields95 @Tang0five @Rugpeersdude @JackTheBestBoss @TheOwlAce @Pilotmario @SledDriver Thank you for the support!
@F4f879 @helilover03 @Liquidfox @tylerdeveneuxmusic @MadBomber @Milo1628xa
@rexinn thank you!
@General360 @SweptBackWing14 @ForeverPie Thank you!
ahahaha
@helilover03 Here is the result
@BogdanX @Baduba @MethaManAircraft @Sgtk @Avro683Lancaster @EpicPigster1 Thanks you so much!
@CRJ900Pilot Thank you!
jeeezuz
This is the historic plane developed while all those dumb americans were thinking about that tsar bomb. MUhAhahAhAhHA
@Squirrel ..No I just add flaps onto a normal wing. I don't normally use structural wings.
wh- ...what?
Screw phones, I'm using a mac and it restarted on it's own.
how are you bronze??? This is this is more like gold level!
Very well done!
@BaconEggs wait... does the picture work?
@helilover03 Sure thing
@Mainblocks I mean this is some next level building technique
@RailfanEthan This plane is historically accurate. 8 guns? It's a lot for me, too but I think it's pretty cool.
@ Colonel1J2R3Wolf
@FuriousDream I don't think you're allowed to advertise on other people's creations.
What did the Ford cop say to the criminal Chevrolet?
"You've just been incarcerated
This could be a game changer...
The same happened to my ME-262. I gave credit to the person who made the fuselage but even though I changed the cockpit, It came up as a successor.@Squirrel
@Squirrel I deleted the SB-9 and started over. I didn't press 'new aircraft' because I thought if you change the cockpit, it would not longer be a successor of that aircraft. This plane had nothing to do whatsoever from that plane. Nothing was intentionally 'copied' from that plane, but the size of the plane gave some inspiration.. I'll give credit and i'm sorry if I broke the rules but I never intended to have it a successor of any plane in the first place. I'll delete if you want me to.
What I don't get though is how I broke the rules by having the plane similar to yours. I feel like you're saying if someone made a P-51, then someone makes some fictional aircraft with minor similarities for example the size or fuselage shape. It was only when it was a successor they would find/acknowledge the similarities. So I have a question. Had I not made it a successor, would you still think it was a rule-breaker because of minor similarities?
@TheOwlAce This plane was partly inspired by your Ar. 76 seaplane.
@F104Deathtrap I am a simple guy. If I see a very awkward plane, I click it.
@RailfanEthan It looks like a crossover of a Corsair and a Wyvern...
@F104Deathtrap Oh my god I'm remembering that joke xD
@ElGatoVolador oh yeah..
What is Pata in spanish? Is that even a spanish word?
For ME 262s, try putting the wings back a bit more then changing the airfoil to 'symmetric'. It provides minimal lift. It's a hard plane to recreate, try looking at the COT, COM, and COL. Follow them closely and look at the way the wings are built. Sometimes they might be too close together, which means you need to rescale the plane to be bigger.
FW190D fuselage... I see what you did there lol
At least accept the fact he put in a lot of effort, maybe even more than all of you guys could.
@Kazin @EpicPigster1 @BaconEggs @BaconAircraft @Sauce @General360 You guys just need to cool it. You guys are just trying to destroy each other by insulting each other's builds.
One, everyone builds in their own way; and there is not anything wrong with that.
Two, Stop being triggered by constructive criticism. It's CRITICISM for crying out loud, it's what is supposed to be said.
Three, if you are making constructive criticism, point out the flaws and say how they can improve it. Don't just walk by and say "I didn't download because it was cool or anything" That's indirectly bragging in many people's perspectives.
Four, stop hating on people below you. Sure you have more points but that does not instantly mean you have the right to hate on them and say it's crap. The community is better than this; I know it, everyone knows it. And if anyone still thinks this is not to end this bickering, I hope you can end it yourselves because you guys are good builders who deserve to work along each other as a whole. Not split each other apart over some sissy-fight about a plane that has some flaws.
Nice looking plane. Doesn't fly yet lol
I like how you said CIVILIAN aircraft this time lmao
So... the third version of this plane devolved into a prop plane?
OR WAS IT EVOLVED????
@Thomasj041 IT WORKS THANK YOU1!1!1!!!11!
@Testin123 @Kevinairlines @Waeverfish @getorge @EpicPigster1 Thank you so much!
Doiner DO 335
(savage)
@jamesPLANESii Putting the download files into simpleplanes then being able to open the mod after reopening the application. The problem is, it's not from workshop. Does chrome not work with downloads or something?
@Tully2001 Yeah. I was trying over and over do download MP but I have a feeling it's not compatible with macs now...
@Tully2001 Are all the mods on steam workshop?
@jamesPLANESii Nah I got it on steam.
@Testin123 Don't you see? She's doing an extremely complicated mathematical equation
@saturn28 How dare you....
Time will fly with effort...