@BagelPlane The tail, nose section, exhaust tubes, and armament (in terms of cannons) vary with pretty much every new version. It's a lot to keep up with and it gets kinda murky researching one specific type or version.
@Omel Doesn't require funky trees. All you need are XML properties at the minimum. (for ex. powerMultiplier at 5 while the max. throttle input is at .5)
@CrushburnHQ You can layer the fuselage parts. One layer would be attached to the main fuselage while the other would be connected to a hinge rotator. (Example) As long as the piece sits flush with the fuselage you can use this technique.
Upon request, here is your 'harsh' critique.
You used a lot of good techniques here, but there are some parts of this plane that are not proportionate to the real thing. (Ex. the leading edge of the main wing leaves too big of a gap between the wing and the front fins, the cockpit/fuselage sections are too thin, the arrestor hook does not sit flush with the fuselage, and the back end of the main wings are slanted too far back) There is a fix for this when making replicas. I recommend using Designersuite if you aren't already using it, it's a lot easier to make accurate replicas without having to eyeball it. The flight model is smooth, and the details are nice to look at. The airbrakes need work, though. You can use thin fuselage pieces to create a curved airbrake piece. (Retracted vs. Extended)
Here's an example of how this works.
Looks really nice and it flies great. I also love the folding wings. However there are some places on the wings where you could've used fuselage pieces instead of inlets to prevent weird shading effects on the wings.
@Shadow17 Yep. This isn't your build. The only thing you did to edit this aside from the cockpit piece was repainted it. This build isn't yours. No matter how much you claim you did more, it's evident that you didn't. You haven't even given credit, and you circumvented the successor system.
A big problem is It’s not about points and attention for a lot of people. I 110% agree with the fact that SP is a free website and people have the right to modify your build with credit. However, there are a lot of instances of people circumventing the successor system, which is a completely different situation in of itself.
Same color scheme, same thumbnail style, same background. Don't settle in with the same style every time. Your more popular builds looked unique. The TU-4, the italian cancer mobile and the FBI van are great examples.
I’ll think of it, but the only reason I haven’t been posting wunderwaffe planes is because the hottest builds are sometimes saturated with those kinds of posts. @Starbound
@NightmareCorporation @asteroidbook345 The person who made it deleted their account.
+1@BagelPlane The tail, nose section, exhaust tubes, and armament (in terms of cannons) vary with pretty much every new version. It's a lot to keep up with and it gets kinda murky researching one specific type or version.
no
+2How do I delete another person's comment
If anything this thread is pretty entertaining. Just wanted to pop in and say hi before this thread gets thanos snapped :)
hi
ok
Christ, the pilot must have some super long legs just to properly sit in this thing.
+3I know its hard to believe but the devs don't snap their fingers and make your wishes come true.
+5we really out here exchanging comments on forum posts for upvotes
Wow. Absolutely atrocious statement. Please stay very far away from this community before you ruin it.
Best map design in the game 10/10.
+4whoa I like the part where it's grey.
The grey part is cool too tho
ok
@Omel Doesn't require funky trees. All you need are XML properties at the minimum. (for ex. powerMultiplier at 5 while the max. throttle input is at .5)
+1How to turn your computer into an IED with 3 easy steps
@EternalDarkness I was joking. I know the superior nation of Cyprus will not get a tag :(
@DeathStalker627 @EternalDarkness The almighty nation of Cyprus doesn't need a military industry
@EternalDarkness Can you please add Cyprus pls and thank
looks cool
+2ℙ𝕃𝔸𝕐𝕊𝕋𝔸𝕋𝕀𝕆ℕ
@CrushburnHQ You can layer the fuselage parts. One layer would be attached to the main fuselage while the other would be connected to a hinge rotator. (Example) As long as the piece sits flush with the fuselage you can use this technique.
@CrushburnHQ Oh, I see, my mistake for thinking it was a replica. Overall this is a job well-done.
Upon request, here is your 'harsh' critique.
You used a lot of good techniques here, but there are some parts of this plane that are not proportionate to the real thing. (Ex. the leading edge of the main wing leaves too big of a gap between the wing and the front fins, the cockpit/fuselage sections are too thin, the arrestor hook does not sit flush with the fuselage, and the back end of the main wings are slanted too far back) There is a fix for this when making replicas. I recommend using Designersuite if you aren't already using it, it's a lot easier to make accurate replicas without having to eyeball it. The flight model is smooth, and the details are nice to look at. The airbrakes need work, though. You can use thin fuselage pieces to create a curved airbrake piece. (Retracted vs. Extended)
Here's an example of how this works.
Looks amazing. Can’t wait to see what you do with this build :)
Awesome guide! There is also a way for people to change the FOV ingame without installing the freecam mod, since it's pretty buggy.
(For ex. if you want an FOV of 15)
Open the dev console and type:
//MainCamera>Camera.set_fieldOfView 15
Then:
//CameraPlane>Camera.set_fieldOfView 15
Looks really nice and it flies great. I also love the folding wings. However there are some places on the wings where you could've used fuselage pieces instead of inlets to prevent weird shading effects on the wings.
@BaconAircraft Thanks, I wasn't aware how pronounced those bumps were in comparison
I already have a two seater built, no worries. @WarHawk95
@TrislandianAlliance The version you are seeing right now is the RF-101.
@Shadow17 Delete the post. It's stolen. Not one bit of this is yours and you shouldn't be rewarded for it either.
@Shadow17 You don't need to tell me you didn't copy it. This is the exact same plane posted by johndfg. You didn't build a single piece of this plane.
bruh moment
@Shadow17 Yep. This isn't your build. The only thing you did to edit this aside from the cockpit piece was repainted it. This build isn't yours. No matter how much you claim you did more, it's evident that you didn't. You haven't even given credit, and you circumvented the successor system.
@Shadow17 why'd you delete my comment
The only part you added was a cockpit piece. Stop lying.
Wow nobs, get on my level >:(((
+1I am numbre on e
I usually just use discord, you can DM a bot and copy the image link
ok
poggers
J2M
Oh no it's starting, bye bye forum thread
The flight model on this thing is amazing. Keep up the good work!
I have the Ned for sped
A big problem is It’s not about points and attention for a lot of people. I 110% agree with the fact that SP is a free website and people have the right to modify your build with credit. However, there are a lot of instances of people circumventing the successor system, which is a completely different situation in of itself.
+2@Cobrahuey OV-10 bronco :)
You should check your priorities. All that time spent on War Thunder is gonna amount to nothing when you’re older.
Why not both?
Looks nice physically, but the weight balance needs some serious work. Your fuel tanks are extremely heavy and make takeoff/flight really difficult.
Same color scheme, same thumbnail style, same background. Don't settle in with the same style every time. Your more popular builds looked unique. The TU-4, the italian cancer mobile and the FBI van are great examples.
+4I’ll think of it, but the only reason I haven’t been posting wunderwaffe planes is because the hottest builds are sometimes saturated with those kinds of posts. @Starbound
+1My pleasure, it’s nice to find a person who also uses the P-61 in WT, it’s pretty much always underestimated :) @ShootsPlanes