@BoeyingOfficial Np, can't wait to take it out for a test flight! You've really improved in making airliners. You're way better than me at making these.
@ChiChiWerx Okay then case closed. I love the mustang much more than the spitfire, but when It comes to performance in terms of air-to-air combat capabilities, and tactical use, the spitfire, In my opinion is better than the P-51. I get you're a fanboy for the P-51 but the spitfire can do many things the P-51 can't do, just as the P-51 can do just as many things as the spitfire can't.
Depends on how good you are at building replicas
I prefer replicas because they are harder to build, more challenging. Plus, if you're drained on ideas for original planes, you've got planes that you can just replicate from real life.
@ChiChiWerx Well if you thought I was saying that then you were saying the same thing in vice-versa. You were basically saying that the P-51 won the war, and the Spitfire didn't do anything. lol
@ChiChiWerx Spitfires paved the way for air superiority over western Europe along with P-47 and P-38 strike missions over German outposts in France and Germany. Other than earlier A-C models of the P-51, which flew over France/Italy in escort missions, The P-51 really didn't see much until there was an open road straight to Berlin, so it is debatable to say that the P-51 was the plane that maintained the air superiority after the ground and air forces of joint-operations made way for allied aircraft straight into germany.
@F104Deathtrap I beg to differ, according to some information I fond the spit was very responsive, agile, and fairly easy to fly. Though, you have a point, the range of the P-51 allowed it to do more than the spitfires at the time could. Unlike spitfires, the P-51 could carry out ground attack missions almost as heavy as P-47s. However, the spit still carried out escort missions over germany, they still did CAS missions, and they modernized and improved a lot in the process, taking up many more roles than the P-51 could, and soon caught up to the P-51 post-war, some versions (Mk 23-24) even surpassing the P-51F. They have their ups and downs. As Awsomur said, they are completely different aircraft for completely different things. The P-51 was simply made to close the gap of escorting problems over europe and the pacific.
The only advantages the P-51 has over the spitfire are speed, range, and service ceiling. The spit flies better, is easier to build, easier to fly, and lighter. P-51 can't really do much compared to the spit
They poof into thin air if they catch fire, the “explosion” wouldn’t provoke a chain reaction because SP physics.@MrDooLittle
The splash damage from the flak cannons will detonate all near by explosive-reactive weapons.@RodWan
@Chancey21 Okay, but I will put little people in the cockpits.
@BoeyingOfficial Np, can't wait to take it out for a test flight! You've really improved in making airliners. You're way better than me at making these.
@jamesPLANESii I know, I've had trouble putting it together, It'll be fixed when it comes out.
nice
+1stop with the forum posts
+1please
They were great planes, but they were not the best in the world, either.
+1This is one of the many reasons I've barely been active this summer, it's nice to distance yourself from technology every now & then.
Well that's just society right now.
3000+ Parts
I’m guessing you downloaded it?
@CRJ900Pilot
I’m pretty sure he left a long while ago
Lol @DuckMintnewprofile
+1Hot
You could’ve just waited for it to peel off itself. @scotttheaviator1031
...wat
Hardy-har-har, very clever
You used an ExactoKnife to cut glue off of your fingers
What kind of drugs are you on
Noice
+1But wait, there's more
+1Criticizing people copying posts after you copied it
Destruction 100
@ChiChiWerx Okay then case closed. I love the mustang much more than the spitfire, but when It comes to performance in terms of air-to-air combat capabilities, and tactical use, the spitfire, In my opinion is better than the P-51. I get you're a fanboy for the P-51 but the spitfire can do many things the P-51 can't do, just as the P-51 can do just as many things as the spitfire can't.
+2Bapity Boopy
+1xD
@ChiChiWerx
+1yes lol
smh
+1You forgot the Adidas stripes.
whoop-didy-scoop
Also the front might need a bit of streamlining
sexy seats btw
@ChiChiWerx Lol, spits did escort missions over europe many times over, but ok.
+1Also I might check out some of those books, they sound interesting.
Depends on how good you are at building replicas
I prefer replicas because they are harder to build, more challenging. Plus, if you're drained on ideas for original planes, you've got planes that you can just replicate from real life.
@ChiChiWerx Well if you thought I was saying that then you were saying the same thing in vice-versa. You were basically saying that the P-51 won the war, and the Spitfire didn't do anything. lol
+1@ChiChiWerx Spitfires paved the way for air superiority over western Europe along with P-47 and P-38 strike missions over German outposts in France and Germany. Other than earlier A-C models of the P-51, which flew over France/Italy in escort missions, The P-51 really didn't see much until there was an open road straight to Berlin, so it is debatable to say that the P-51 was the plane that maintained the air superiority after the ground and air forces of joint-operations made way for allied aircraft straight into germany.
+1People are just like that, sadly.
Np, I’m a big fan of everything Howard Hughes. @Jaden24
I meant in terms of air superiority @ChiChiWerx
+1neato
@CarsonG1017 you know you can delete comments, right?
Not a fan of that call-sign but this plane is cool
+1damn, those elbows
+2Good thing it's not 1/1 scale
no
@MrDoolittle Maybe it's because the weapons are clumped together?
@F104Deathtrap I beg to differ, according to some information I fond the spit was very responsive, agile, and fairly easy to fly. Though, you have a point, the range of the P-51 allowed it to do more than the spitfires at the time could. Unlike spitfires, the P-51 could carry out ground attack missions almost as heavy as P-47s. However, the spit still carried out escort missions over germany, they still did CAS missions, and they modernized and improved a lot in the process, taking up many more roles than the P-51 could, and soon caught up to the P-51 post-war, some versions (Mk 23-24) even surpassing the P-51F. They have their ups and downs. As Awsomur said, they are completely different aircraft for completely different things. The P-51 was simply made to close the gap of escorting problems over europe and the pacific.
+1That screenshot resolution is 👌
+10b a n n e d
+1The only advantages the P-51 has over the spitfire are speed, range, and service ceiling. The spit flies better, is easier to build, easier to fly, and lighter. P-51 can't really do much compared to the spit
+1There is no "SP Planet"
The doom of SP building? lol, it's cool but something like that won't be everybody's cup of tea.
no
@MrDoolittle High
They poof into thin air if they catch fire, the “explosion” wouldn’t provoke a chain reaction because SP physics.@MrDooLittle
The splash damage from the flak cannons will detonate all near by explosive-reactive weapons.@RodWan
Test this please
will you make a mechanical rabbit in sp
+1