@Boeing727200F ditto, it indeed is.. I much prefer Ignorance is Medicine though I can't seem to remember who said it or what was the exact quote, but too much of it will instead yknow, kill you
@TheRLAF it is arrogant indeed, and it is even more arrogant for me to decide unilaterally without consulting those who contributed heavily to it
.
I might be one of the central PEA builder, but my specialization lies in WW2 or earlier along with extreme part-saving measure which is almost the complete opposite of someone like Zero or Miss E. disregarding them without consulting is the same as stepping on their toes with high heels intentionally, which is a big ow
.
atleast personally, I don't want to be disregarded like that, so in the same way, I want to ask for their opinion first
I am excluded from this uhh.. vote? yeah that works, you can discuss it with them
.
personally I am towards keeping it as is, since atleast to my own feelings, it diminishes actual good PEA replicas by combining it with(and I am half-sorry about this) subpar fictional crafts.
.
PEA had suffered from this exact problem which is why I also kinda discontinued the PEA forum.. I know it was originally a project for the community, but half-baked submissions and some had crashed the name of PEA which then it became somewhat synonymous with "low quality crafts" and that's what I wanna avoid because of my selfishness.
.
I know it's a tall order, but there's a reason I call it "PEA"(besides the funny acronym), as it stands for "Part Efficient Aircrafts".
.
take a look at many other user's PEA and then compare it to mine, the different magnitude of efficiency would be damning(as arrogant as that sounds), and now take that also and see Miss E's and Zero's PEA, their high-quality renditions and crafts, replicating with as minimal of a part and with the greatest performance in flight..
.
PEA might be stale, and the name itself may not denote "replica", but it has gone far with it carrying the mantle of "replica" that I cannot just change it willy Billy without consulting the big players first and also my good friend TWD
or anything really, make it a zip, send it by Bluetooth, a lot of ways if you're stubborn enough.
.
im speaking from experience, yes. as outdated as manual Bluetooth sharing is, it works sooo..? I'd say worth a shot
@TheRLAF if I got energy to spare? I actually got a funny sweet idea that's gonna look dope at night. it's called "night flowers"!... it.. it's just those radio towers and stuff with the blinking red lights, they're beautiful to see from afar.
@TheRLAF *boogyingly boogles the boogy doobbles*
@KudaOni niceeeee eyyyyy
@blt well, that works.. and you're welcome :3
@Boeing727200F ditto, it indeed is.. I much prefer Ignorance is Medicine though I can't seem to remember who said it or what was the exact quote, but too much of it will instead yknow, kill you
@Michiganstatepolicethe2nd honestly it's because of mislabelling and also practical.. so in a sense, I guess you might be lmfao?
@ZealousKestrel y e :3
@Boeing727200F who doesn't lmfao, God Bless Steve Irwin cause fxxk dem PETA
@ZealousKestrel Monar-chee, combination of Monarchy and Chii("small"in Japanese)
still in construction....
@TheRLAF well, we're good to go, I'll make a short forum then!
@TWDDerSharkmarine also, been a while, howsya? :3
and yes, slop is the problem, that's the word I was searching
@TheUltimatePlaneLover @ZeroWithSlashedO @TWDDerSharkmarine so I take it we're good to go for combining replicas and fictionals?
@TheRLAF it is arrogant indeed, and it is even more arrogant for me to decide unilaterally without consulting those who contributed heavily to it
.
I might be one of the central PEA builder, but my specialization lies in WW2 or earlier along with extreme part-saving measure which is almost the complete opposite of someone like Zero or Miss E. disregarding them without consulting is the same as stepping on their toes with high heels intentionally, which is a big ow
.
atleast personally, I don't want to be disregarded like that, so in the same way, I want to ask for their opinion first
@LocalDealer @KudaOni howsya two goin?
h i
I know it's a rant, but there's my reason of keeping it as is.. as little of a reason it might sound
I am excluded from this uhh.. vote? yeah that works, you can discuss it with them
.
personally I am towards keeping it as is, since atleast to my own feelings, it diminishes actual good PEA replicas by combining it with(and I am half-sorry about this) subpar fictional crafts.
.
PEA had suffered from this exact problem which is why I also kinda discontinued the PEA forum.. I know it was originally a project for the community, but half-baked submissions and some had crashed the name of PEA which then it became somewhat synonymous with "low quality crafts" and that's what I wanna avoid because of my selfishness.
.
I know it's a tall order, but there's a reason I call it "PEA"(besides the funny acronym), as it stands for "Part Efficient Aircrafts".
.
take a look at many other user's PEA and then compare it to mine, the different magnitude of efficiency would be damning(as arrogant as that sounds), and now take that also and see Miss E's and Zero's PEA, their high-quality renditions and crafts, replicating with as minimal of a part and with the greatest performance in flight..
.
PEA might be stale, and the name itself may not denote "replica", but it has gone far with it carrying the mantle of "replica" that I cannot just change it willy Billy without consulting the big players first and also my good friend TWD
oh maybe for balance, @TWDDerSharkmarine(if he's available), howsya?
@TheRLAF I'll re-establish it one of this days maybe.. if I'm not lazy which I am.
.
anyway to call the big shots in PEA that I can remember!
or anything really, make it a zip, send it by Bluetooth, a lot of ways if you're stubborn enough.
.
im speaking from experience, yes. as outdated as manual Bluetooth sharing is, it works sooo..? I'd say worth a shot
@SukhoiSu25 import it as in save it to cloud or discord of sort?
@Graingy @Boeing727200F e v e r y t h i n g is i nH A T
@TheRLAF i thinl for now ill keep itbas is, unless you wanna have a go at creating a forum tallying how mucj fictional peas there are
@PIbex oho
also hella hot, ohonnn
@Graingy tatertiger
hecc YA
@Gander ohoo
@Graingy v o i m d h a t t e d
@Graingy spudlion
@Mrcooldude do not eat the cat
@Graingy so be it, TATERCATS!
mmm, b e p
@Graingy halloumicination
such foolishingness
@Graingy it's a foolish trait, they're fools, I'm fools, we're all fools, maybe you fools, I don't know fools
@Graingy nonsense, I love potatoes and cats SO IT SHOULD BE GOOD
@YarisSedan exactly
mind you, I love cats AND potatoes, my favourite animal and (one of) my favourite carbs!
I remembered something like.. a cat? but also a potato..? and I felt overwhelming dread of it for some reason.
@Graingy I am literate so I can do a pandafrog move
anyway, probably not.. what would you call a gem strewn across the sky... sparkling? carbondioxiding? glittering..?
@Graingy Oopie Powie!
@Graingy feels way too magical.. mystifying? no...
@Graingy I suppose I should've clarified that like butter, I'm a pandafrog
@Graingy they're hypnotizing.. mesmerising..? what's the best word for it...
@Graingy ...pedos? the other word? not torpedos?
not so much when you crash into it tho
@TheRLAF if I got energy to spare? I actually got a funny sweet idea that's gonna look dope at night. it's called "night flowers"!... it.. it's just those radio towers and stuff with the blinking red lights, they're beautiful to see from afar.