Extraordinary work, its almost perfect... the smoothing, details, landing gear, interior, decals/paint job, functionality and overall look, Plus the part count...
Great job man keep it up.
Yea there's some problems with this challenge with that logic applied. And what happens with the Boeing 747-400 do you have a part range of 747-400 or do you subtract 400 from 747?
And what happens with aircraft with X in their name, do you have to make the part count an Algebraic equation???
Great work, like the fuselage.
+1Extraordinary work, really detailed and perfected for 800 parts.
+1Excellent work, came out great in the end, just make sure to keep using the big thumbnail trick.
+1Maybe if he didn't have a almost 100 MPH crosswind.
+1Excellent work, great paint job
+1Excellent work
+1Nice and innovative with the tracer particles
+1@JBPAviation Yea just zoom up alittle like the essay said lol.
+1Extraordinary work, its almost perfect... the smoothing, details, landing gear, interior, decals/paint job, functionality and overall look, Plus the part count...
+1Great job man keep it up.
Excellent work
+1@RicardoACE I see, lol.
+1Excellent work, looks nice and realistic.
+1Extraordinary work
+1Legendary work
+1Legendary work
+1Excellent work, im surprised you pulled off the paint job in 171 parts.
+1Excellent work, unique build.
+1When the military says "you both won" to the YF-22/23
+1Extraordinary work.
+1Extraordinary work, complex where it needs to be while looking the part.
+1@Christiant2 But the bomber Triad is there so that's all that matters.
+1Extraordinary work, WWII aircraft now?
+1Excellent work
+1Extra Legendary work, all round perfect.
+1Great work, still keeps the looks and loses the parts.
+1@factpoultry No I'm saying it is AI, scroll up to "basic requirements" and that will pretty much explain it.
+1Excellent work, that thumbnail looks great!
+1Excellent work.
+1Can't have the car exterior in Detroit dawg
+1(plen)
+1Extraordinary work.
+1Extraordinary work, looks great tracks came out good to.
+1@PapaKernels I mean, Andrew liked it. lol
+1You're a Excellent builder with Excellent Work, keep it up!
+1Your description is correct, your not a great builder
+1Extraordinary work, you really mastered the look of the real life counterpart.
+1@TheMouse Bro it's a joke lol, also unless you got a simple air frame that kinda holds true with all low part planes.
+1Excellent work, creatively visionary, really sells it.
+1@Apollo018362 And then made it AI
+1Looking great Jundroo team! Love to see the player content.
+1Well this is cool as hell, Extraordinary work.
+1Extraordinary work
+1Not the worst but a lil chonky... Like the render sent to minimum meme it has no features, it is the fuselage...
+1Yea there's some problems with this challenge with that logic applied. And what happens with the Boeing 747-400 do you have a part range of 747-400 or do you subtract 400 from 747?
+1And what happens with aircraft with X in their name, do you have to make the part count an Algebraic equation???
Bombardier Global 8000 💀💀💀
+1B-1 Lancer 💀
+1Congrats! Good quality uploads for the win!
+1@WinsWings Thanks, you would have to know the context (movie) though to fully enjoy the creation. (like with the Pelican I made)
+1Great work, looks good.
+1Excellent work.
+1