@XxRxX your right, I will fix the f-24 up and make it so both aircraft are ai, I will try to make a proper aoa limeter so it's not able to to witchcraft, I have got missle kills I used the missles from a realistic missles pack, I am trying to find the person to give credit, for the sustained turns I will see some tutorials on how to fix that sorry for the inconvenience
@TheCommentaryGuy it appears computers and professional engineers disagree " McDonnell Douglas X-36 " and by that logic let's talk about the ngad program which will develop a jet that replaces the f-22 and should put the f-15 ex out of a job because guess what, the massive tail on a f-22 don't help much with RCS either
@XxRxX also to your ai can't dogfight it's pretty challenging with a equally matched aircraft, it just needs to get the nose towards you while your doing a roll and your dead, even if it's just turning
I will judge apon looks but most of the points will go towards performance and how many times it can kill my wyvern in 10 dogfights point system:
. 1-80 mixture of looks,performance,realism and deadliness
@TheCommentaryGuy no, no it wouldn't if this where true so would a tail on a f-22, and especially the f-35, it's about the materials and shape Of the wing
@alvinvex https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/V5q3j0/f-24-silver-wyvern-FIX-AND-SLIGHT-COCKPIT-REVAMP bacon probably won't make it a successor in time so here
Ahem. Reject metric embrace imperial (joke, since I play juno: new origins I forced myself to learn metric, they both are good saying "metric is better" or visa versa is like saying the f-22 is better than the f-35, both very good aircraft now this is getting very long and I doubt anyone will read this why am I continuing this ok I will press submit edit: WHY AM I STILL TYPEING THIS PLEASE HELP
@XxRxX your right, I will fix the f-24 up and make it so both aircraft are ai, I will try to make a proper aoa limeter so it's not able to to witchcraft, I have got missle kills I used the missles from a realistic missles pack, I am trying to find the person to give credit, for the sustained turns I will see some tutorials on how to fix that sorry for the inconvenience
@Justacanadianguy put the xml code in the thrust vectoring and tail find inplace of the pitch control scheme
@TheCommentaryGuy it appears computers and professional engineers disagree " McDonnell Douglas X-36 " and by that logic let's talk about the ngad program which will develop a jet that replaces the f-22 and should put the f-15 ex out of a job because guess what, the massive tail on a f-22 don't help much with RCS either
@oan124 thanks I will test it this week!
@Justacanadianguy @LeonardorHD1 I put in the wrong code clamp((Pitch+Trim/4)*smooth(clamp01(GForce<number),0.5),-1,1
@XxRxX also to your ai can't dogfight it's pretty challenging with a equally matched aircraft, it just needs to get the nose towards you while your doing a roll and your dead, even if it's just turning
Rewards:
All entries 2 upvotes
3rd place 7 upvotes
2nd plane 14 upvotes
1rst place 35 upvotes
@XxRxX as in no instant kill boom boom 0 lock time 100000 muzzle velocity kinda things
@AlivePan cool
@winterro I can tell by the thumbnail this will be good
@Justacanadianguy but all you need is the code I supplied
@Justacanadianguy look on the stock vr aircraft they will have a lot of instruments
@Robomo119DerMustangKiller I will test your builds yes
@XxRxX no no I will use the dogfight tab on the sandbox section
@LeonardorHD1 ok
I will judge apon looks but most of the points will go towards performance and how many times it can kill my wyvern in 10 dogfights point system:
. 1-80 mixture of looks,performance,realism and deadliness
@TheCommentaryGuy no, no it wouldn't if this where true so would a tail on a f-22, and especially the f-35, it's about the materials and shape Of the wing
@alvinvex https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/V5q3j0/f-24-silver-wyvern-FIX-AND-SLIGHT-COCKPIT-REVAMP bacon probably won't make it a successor in time so here
@AlivePan welcome back panalive did you have a good time touching grass?
@sus232 an-72
Ahem. Reject metric embrace imperial (joke, since I play juno: new origins I forced myself to learn metric, they both are good saying "metric is better" or visa versa is like saying the f-22 is better than the f-35, both very good aircraft now this is getting very long and I doubt anyone will read this why am I continuing this ok I will press submit edit: WHY AM I STILL TYPEING THIS PLEASE HELP
@Neruneten21 perfect
@Neruneten21 can I make planes that where prototypes or planned to be made
@ToeTips I hope so
Thanks to @ChiChiWerx for the insignia used on modern fighters
Good job! You should be gold by now, if not platinum
@Zaineman @ToeTips @GrandmasterPotato
@Zaineman @ToeTips @GrandmasterPotato cockpit revamp and wheel fix is out! I fixed the flaws it had since this build was rush
@Yourlocalhuman it appears people have noticed
@Neruneten21 thanks, the missles are from a small realistic pack I found awhile ago, once I find the person I will credit them
T
@Zaineman ya I ment to put the disclaimer a month ago, forgot about it sorry for the mixup I do live in Michigan though
@Zaineman sorry for the disappointment
@Zaineman just saw it, it is a honer
👍
5TH GENERATION
Cool 3rd
@1999ShadesOfDemocracy k
@1999ShadesOfDemocracy you earned my respect
I also suspect there makeing a better fuselage editor
You ever wonder why simpleplanes hasn't been updated yet, basic rcs and ir signature coding is in the game
Sorry I was late :(
@Wibbley I'm thinking about makeing some chicken breeds I own
@Wibbley ok
Have you ever thought of making a land fowl, I find how they fly interesting
@Zaineman thanks
@BaconAircraft make this a successor to
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/jdNoJx/Joint-Strike-Air-Program-CHALLENGE
Please
I think all you guys requested tags I don't know for sure though
@GuyFolk
@WinsWings