@Vikram123 i agree, any extra wing bit probably increases the rcs a fair bit, especially from top and bottom perspectives

@Michiganstatepolice I feel like having canards rather than horizontal stabilizers and vise versa would increase the rcs the same amount because either way they are both control surfaces adding extra area for radar waves to be reflected, hence why we see many concepts without any control surfaces except but just the flying wing.

@Aditiaa just curious, why is the CoL so far below where the aircraft is? It's completely outside of where any wings or even the body should be. Is it a glitch?
*
Edit: oh, that's why. You didn't even BOTHER giving this aircraft wings! So now I'm left to wonder why. You could've made them completely flat and had them inside of the wing-shaped fuselage pieces.

@SkyJayTheFirst thanks for the insight dude, ngl this is my first stealth fighter so it still has so many flaws that needs to be fixed

@Aditiaa Ok, so a few flaws:
*
It has way too many drag points and its engine power is far too unrealistic for its own good. That, and its CoL is far outside of the aircraft for some reason.
*
Other than that, for a silver member, you did amazing here.

@TheCommentaryGuy it appears computers and professional engineers disagree " McDonnell Douglas X-36 " and by that logic let's talk about the ngad program which will develop a jet that replaces the f-22 and should put the f-15 ex out of a job because guess what, the massive tail on a f-22 don't help much with RCS either

@Michiganstatepolice "Canard aircraft can potentially have poor stealth characteristics because they present large angular surfaces that tend to reflect radar signals forwards. The Eurofighter Typhoon uses software control of its canards in order to reduce its effective radar cross section."

@TheCommentaryGuy no, no it wouldn't if this where true so would a tail on a f-22, and especially the f-35, it's about the materials and shape Of the wing

@KmsErikaMaid thats the worst thing about this build aside from the fact that this aircraft has no funky trees in it

Good job, but it's a shame this plane eats up too many parts. This plane could only have 400-600 parts and even then with more features than this

@MobileBuilder21 thnx a lot dude, can u give me upvote ? it means a lot dude

Nice fighter

@TheCommentaryGuy I would say it doesn't because it's just stabilizers repositioned, I think people just don't do it. There's a forum post about stealth planes and how canards is stealth

@TheCommentaryGuy sadly it is, but at least it looks cool tho

If this were real, the canards would increase the RCS