@TheMouse basically it was a mess. Passed 5 years waiting for what turned out to be an unfinished, buggy early access that costed as much as the regular KSP without most of the features.
@Nyamomin yes it does include side mirros since i'm using the site's measurements to count which builds count or not.
But if the width Is like 1.6/1.7m with side mirros i can make and exception.
@BYardley i managed to find some information about the size and it unfortunately doesn't count. It's a 4 meters long and 1.8 meters wide car so it's more of a B segment Subcompact than a Microcar.
@Majakalona thanks, i really wanted to focus on details on this considering that
A) i already had a working vehicle to start from
B) the Original B0X1 was very simplistic
"we're going to fight all of humanity to get Chickens off the menù.That's right! We're going to fight all of humanity to get Chickens off the menù!" -Fighter Hen, 2023
@XAircraftManufacturer Happy to be here :).
It's nice seeing you branch out from airliners, i'm really curious about what you're cooking up with this one ;)
@DatRoadTrainGuy19 i have been really busy this part of the year so i kinda "forgor" to post it. I think i'll try posting it this weekend but i'm not sure. Really sorry for the wait.
@TheTomatoLover sorry man but this barely doesn't qualify. It violates rule 6 and 7. But don't worry, just modify it and repost it.
I know this is supposed to be a joke entry but since it's close to following every rule i would like you to follow my advice.
@TheFlightGuySP thanks, with the vertical stabilizers i was trying to make a YB-49 like plane but thinking about it the airbarkes are better. Do you have an input or an FT code that i could use?
Bro think he's on the team💀
+1Great entry 👍
+1Hur hur
+1hurhur hur
hur hurhur, hurhur
hur hur, hurhur
hur hur, hurhur
@TheMouse basically it was a mess. Passed 5 years waiting for what turned out to be an unfinished, buggy early access that costed as much as the regular KSP without most of the features.
+1@Graingy i mean, i hope it doesn't end up like the KSP2 launch.
+1WE'RE GETTING THE ENTIRE SP COMMUNITY HYPED UP WITH THIS ONE🗣️🗣️🗣️💥💥💥‼️‼️‼️‼️
+110/10 screenshot
+1@Nyamomin yes it does include side mirros since i'm using the site's measurements to count which builds count or not.
+1But if the width Is like 1.6/1.7m with side mirros i can make and exception.
That's cool, could you add a description with a bit of info about the car, so you can respect all of the rules.
+1oh wow, this is cool
+1@DatTrainAndCarGuy19
Bro was so fast he upvoted before the build finished publishing 💀
+1LIVE AIRLINERBUILDER REACTION
+1HEY!
+1Well that was fast💀
+1Step 1: go back to monky
+1Step 2: ??????
Step 3: ????
Step 4: Profit
sorry man but the car should have at least 20 parts to enter the challenge, so this is disqualified. You can try again, no worries.
+1@BYardley i managed to find some information about the size and it unfortunately doesn't count. It's a 4 meters long and 1.8 meters wide car so it's more of a B segment Subcompact than a Microcar.
+1@001 sure!
+1Disqualified: Doesn't reach the minimum part limit
+1@BYardley Bro is about to cook 🗣️🔥🔥‼️‼️
+1@MrCOPTY not a microcar, it's larger than the size limit i put and it's classified as a citycar.
+1@PapaKernels
Short answer: YES
+1T
+1THEY'VE BARRED THE GATES! USE THE BATTERING RAM!
+1@TheCommentaryGuy
well, this just got interesting...
+1Clickbait, all i see is an accurate 3D model of CaseOh
+1@Speedhunter yes
+1@DatTrainGuy19 finally found out how to use ImgBB lol
+1@Majakalona thanks, i really wanted to focus on details on this considering that
+1A) i already had a working vehicle to start from
B) the Original B0X1 was very simplistic
@DatTrainGuy19 WE NO-CLIPPING ALL OVER THE CITY WITH THIS ONE 🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥‼️‼️
+1@XAircraftManufacturer *insert heavy TF2 eating sounds
+1"we're going to fight all of humanity to get Chickens off the menù. That's right! We're going to fight all of humanity to get Chickens off the menù!" -Fighter Hen, 2023
+1@Graingy alright.
+1I've avoided this long enough
@Graingy good point
+1@TheOfficalMarylander ..and national anthem!..
+1@XAircraftManufacturer Happy to be here :).
+1It's nice seeing you branch out from airliners, i'm really curious about what you're cooking up with this one ;)
Idk why but this gives me Citroen vibes XD
+1truly one of the simpleplanes moments of all time
+1huh?
+1@ToeTips oh that's easy! A circus. (/s)
+1@DatRoadTrainGuy19 i have been really busy this part of the year so i kinda "forgor" to post it. I think i'll try posting it this weekend but i'm not sure. Really sorry for the wait.
+1Here before this comment section eventually turns into a World War
+1fastest updoot in the west
+1@TheTomatoLover sorry man but this barely doesn't qualify. It violates rule 6 and 7. But don't worry, just modify it and repost it.
+1I know this is supposed to be a joke entry but since it's close to following every rule i would like you to follow my advice.
@TheTomatoLover i will allow anything that respects the rules. So if you manage to make something simple that still respects them then go ahead.
+1T
+1@HiddenDeath some bots were hacking some accounts to spam scam links in forums to hack other accounts
+1@TheFlightGuySP Thank you so much, i'll try it out as possible
+1@TheFlightGuySP thanks, with the vertical stabilizers i was trying to make a YB-49 like plane but thinking about it the airbarkes are better. Do you have an input or an FT code that i could use?
+1T
+1