@Noname918181818181818181 builds with lower performance cost may perform badly because of excessive amounts of moving parts/weird aerodynamics, but I suppose performance cost is prolly the best way of gauging its compatibility with vr
It’s a shame curated crafts need to have such low performance cost. Granted I prolly go overboard with details but whats the point in be if you can’t provide the most realistic experience possible 😭
@KingOfTypos I thought the 109 v55 and 209h were the same aircraft no? Maybe at different stages of development i suppose. It definitely has tbe 209h wings, seems like it kept the standard db605 engine rather than the 603, with the same vertical tail plane.
@andrewgarrison I noticed somebody in the comments complaining about the german iconography, I can remove them if it’s necessary? Not sure of the rules or if it’s bad optics!
@AviationLoverGEEK444 me 209s were a group of experimental successor variants to the bf109g in late ww2 germany - i thought they looked cool so i went at it
@Boeing727200F i wouldve tried, but theyve got an entirely different curved wing structure and cockpit which are like the two hardest parts to model of the he111
@TheAvgeekNextDoor there was an experimental 109 with pontoons called the 109w so ill just throw in a final modified 109f4 when i post my 209h and 109g-0. itll have a new paint scheme and of course pontoon/landing system but shoudlnt be anything special from my last few builds! i got a couple cool new ones in the works tho
@Pnut @CaptainBrayden @GeneralCorpInc
@Randomplayer @DeeganWithABazooka @Ericshideout
@CaptainBrayden im releasing it today :/ although ive got a later variant that does need some flioght model testing if youre interested
We need more player content reviews
+2@Graingy i aint got the time :/
@Graingy multiplyer?
@Graingy no 🥺
@dekanii to be fair the auto reconnection part mechanic has driven me over the edge so im prolly not far off schizoing in forum post comment sections
+1@Graingy ye
@Pnut it’s a beautiful plane,pity there aren’t more
+1@Noname918181818181818181 builds with lower performance cost may perform badly because of excessive amounts of moving parts/weird aerodynamics, but I suppose performance cost is prolly the best way of gauging its compatibility with vr
+3It’s a shame curated crafts need to have such low performance cost. Granted I prolly go overboard with details but whats the point in be if you can’t provide the most realistic experience possible 😭
+4@Ericshideout there are a couple 5600 pc versions, should be playable
@Ericshideout 9000! but there will be lower cost versions at around 5.6k, without cockpit and with simplified controls.
@KingOfTypos I thought the 109 v55 and 209h were the same aircraft no? Maybe at different stages of development i suppose. It definitely has tbe 209h wings, seems like it kept the standard db605 engine rather than the 603, with the same vertical tail plane.
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 maybe when sp2comes out! im stocked up rn
+2@andrewgarrison I noticed somebody in the comments complaining about the german iconography, I can remove them if it’s necessary? Not sure of the rules or if it’s bad optics!
@AviationLoverGEEK444 two!
@KingOfTypos cool. thats the pre bv155 prototype right
@Apollo018362 literally it means being stoned, but like if anything is absurd geeked is a good word to use
+1@spectre118 should be around 650kmh at 5000metres
@spectre118 the clime rate, glide ratio and max speeds line up with what they would be irl
@DeeganWithABazooka to be fair, the me209s only share the rear fuselage and cockpit with the 109s. also its 11 lmao
@AviationLoverGEEK444 me 209s were a group of experimental successor variants to the bf109g in late ww2 germany - i thought they looked cool so i went at it
+3@Boeing727200F i wouldve tried, but theyve got an entirely different curved wing structure and cockpit which are like the two hardest parts to model of the he111
+1@Yeetuscheese uhh not riht now i already showed you the do335! i havent made an fw190, but @coolpeach has a v good one
@Kenmiles i lied
@Boeing727200F i made it up
@SuperSuperTheSylph the double bubble
+2@Nenormal
@YarisHatchback @X99STRIKER @Ericshideout
+1@SuperSuperTheSylph @Solent @TheAvgeekNextDoor
+2@Randomplayer @CaptainBrayden @Boeing727200F
@KingOfTypos shape is most important !
+1@KingOfTypos it’s a beautiful aircraft! Definitely tag me if you do.
@Dragoranos do335 pookie
+2@TheAvgeekNextDoor there was an experimental 109 with pontoons called the 109w so ill just throw in a final modified 109f4 when i post my 209h and 109g-0. itll have a new paint scheme and of course pontoon/landing system but shoudlnt be anything special from my last few builds! i got a couple cool new ones in the works tho
+4@BOSKnight YIPPEE <3 <3 <3
+21000 part limit
+1@AdlerSteiner much love pookie <3
+2@Yeetuscheese i was gonna tag on the other build but honestly its not close to being done
@Yeetuscheese by all means! As much as possible. If you want, I’ve got a few builds in the works that you can test fly and share as a little teaser
@StrikerUreka22 no i wouldnt. to model the shape, include intracate details and have a realistic cockpit, 2000+ parts is neccessary.
@Cadvalto bf109 x ta152 !
luv it :)
+1@AviationLoverGEEK444 no its amazing
+1@RepublicofWrightIsles yeah! they basically took the do335/ta152 engines and slapped them on a 109g with bigger wings and tail section
@Dreamlinerboi i used to work on a thinkpad, theyre so slow bro
@AviationLoverGEEK444 thanks pookie bear <3
+1@Dissent3R this had me lost for 3 hours lmao
+1