Looks 3/10 helllll a ugly
Functionality 4/10 is slow, takes 4 ever to take off, and yes at has a few torpedos, but they're only enough to take out the USS Beast, and the you have the destroyers to deal with. :(
Total score 7/20 🤮
Looks: 7/10 is pretty detailed, but has no cockpit view :/
Functionality: 6/10 is extremely maneuverable and can acetate in the blink of an eye, but only has 2 cannons, and with no cockpit view, aiming them is a pain in the butt. :(
Final score: 13//20. At least you tried
Looks 6/10 The cockpit view wasn't that detailed, and you could try using fuesalage
to make the wings. It looks a lot better
Functionality 9/10 has a lot of cannon rounds, swing wings, and a few bombs and missiles. That's all I needed to hear
Looks; 9.5/10 For a early cold war dive bomber, it is extremely detailed, and has a very realistic cockpit
Functionality: 7/10 has 6 machine guns, but doesn't have enough weapons to eliminate a lot of ground targets. Is very maneuverable tho.
Final score: 18.5/20 very good!
@BOSSentinel
Sorry about this...
Looks 3/10, not aerodynamic, has extremely blocky wings, and the gun on the nose is very ugly :(
Functionality 5/10. For what it is (which I'm assuming is a early cold war dive bomber) it has 3 machine guns 2 bomb 25s, and 2 low power cannons. This is not a lot of weapons, and they honestly can't do that much damage.
It also has no flares, so it's cooked if it goes against any modern planes.
Sorry this entire comment was basically criticism, but you are also flirting with the no ww2 rule so just consider that as well.
Looks 7/10 very detailed, but doesn't have a cockpit view
Functionality 9/10 For a bomber, very maneuverable, has a lot of flares and is pretty fast. The only thing holding it back is that I think it could have more weapons
Total score 16 out of 20 Good job!
Honestly I don't know what you expected
Looks 3/10 helllll a ugly
Functionality 4/10 is slow, takes 4 ever to take off, and yes at has a few torpedos, but they're only enough to take out the USS Beast, and the you have the destroyers to deal with. :(
Total score 7/20 🤮
Looks: 7/10 is pretty detailed, but has no cockpit view :/
Functionality: 6/10 is extremely maneuverable and can acetate in the blink of an eye, but only has 2 cannons, and with no cockpit view, aiming them is a pain in the butt. :(
Final score: 13//20. At least you tried
Looks 6/10 The cockpit view wasn't that detailed, and you could try using fuesalage
to make the wings. It looks a lot better
Functionality 9/10 has a lot of cannon rounds, swing wings, and a few bombs and missiles. That's all I needed to hear
Total score: 15/20 respectable
Looks; 9.5/10 For a early cold war dive bomber, it is extremely detailed, and has a very realistic cockpit
+1Functionality: 7/10 has 6 machine guns, but doesn't have enough weapons to eliminate a lot of ground targets. Is very maneuverable tho.
Final score: 18.5/20 very good!
@Zilozite I also entered this challenge... Except mine's 6th gen 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
(Also how do you add screenshots to the description I need to know)
@XM803ENJOYER46 what trend?? (I don't use TikTok or Instagram so I have no idea what you mean)
@Zilozite sorry
@XM803ENJOYER46 thanks
@XM803ENJOYER46 I'm even more confused... Do you even know what a su 57 looks like?!?!?!
@SPWithLizzie fair enough
@Zilozite No... What if you are him?!?!?!
😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
Looks like flanker, why'd you name it after su 25 tho
@XM803ENJOYER46 or throw a alligator into a Wendy's drive thru window
@EagleMan010 He can also rob a Walmart in a Darth Vader costume
@EagleMan010 He can do whatever you want him to do
@BOSKINGHT
@schmoovebrain
@carguy32sp
@BOSSentinel oh well I made it in like 5 minute's so that
makes sense
@SukhoiisLegend joined yesterday
@SukhoiisLegend better than my a 6 lol
@CarGuy32SP c'est vraiment cool
@BOSSentinel ok well Switzerland was always neutral so what were they doing making a trainer/attacker anyways
@Erionh yeah, it is!
@BOSSentinel well, whatever
@CarGuy32SP oui
@BOSSentinel bruh it does not. F 104 has wingspan of like 2 meters
@CarGuy32SP and Russian, and English, and a little spanish
@BOSSentinel ok, well unfortunately I grade on usefulness and realisim, so sorry about low rating
@CarGuy32SP Merci beaucoup Mon Ami (french Speedrun vibes)
@BOSSentinel I guess wings are 2 m shorter than real su 25, but it's also 2 m shorter, so it should balance out
@SchmooveBrain oh well thanks :)
@BOSSentinel it's 2 meters shorter than a real su 25!!!! ITS NOT LONG!!!
@Mitterbin whats that
+1@BOSSentinel ok well that doesn't really change my rating
@BOSSentinel I means, compared to my 5k special it's short
+1@BOSSentinel bro it's not that long!
+1@SchmooveBrain oh ok this is my first really detailed plane so I might have some mistakes
+1@bosknight
@rb107
@aviationgeeklover444
@mitterbin
+2@schmoovebrain
@carguy32sp
@AviationLoverGEEK444
Looks:8/10 very realistic and detailed, but no cockpit view :/
Functionality: 9/10 is very fast, has 14 bombs and 6 cleavers,and unlimited Flares
Does have a slow turn rate though.
Final score: 17/20 very good!
+1@BOSSentinel
Looks 3/10 I have no words...
Functionality 7/10 does have quite a few toys to use on enemies, but isn't that maneuverable
Total score 10/20
@BOSSentinel
Sorry about this...
Looks 3/10, not aerodynamic, has extremely blocky wings, and the gun on the nose is very ugly :(
Functionality 5/10. For what it is (which I'm assuming is a early cold war dive bomber) it has 3 machine guns 2 bomb 25s, and 2 low power cannons. This is not a lot of weapons, and they honestly can't do that much damage.
It also has no flares, so it's cooked if it goes against any modern planes.
Sorry this entire comment was basically criticism, but you are also flirting with the no ww2 rule so just consider that as well.
Total score 8/20 sorry dude.
@RB107
Looks 7/10 very detailed, but doesn't have a cockpit view
Functionality 9/10 For a bomber, very maneuverable, has a lot of flares and is pretty fast. The only thing holding it back is that I think it could have more weapons
Total score 16 out of 20 Good job!
@ORZpasserAtw that would be fun
GRADING HAS STARTED YOU CAN NO LONGER ENTER
@YpaYpafromCN I mean yeah it can run it, but that must've taken forever to make
@WinsWings I guess, one of my challenges is closing today so I have to do some grading
@YpaYpafromCN
+1How did you make a 1000 part plane on android?!?!
@Bugati87 oh that sounds cool tag me when ur done
@MobileBuilder21 guess that makes sense
@Bugati87 so ur just testing a drone?