@Noname918181818181818181 As you know, I have the tank project and a few aircraft projects (50s/60s strategic bomber, like two aircraft remakes, and probably something I'm forgetting), but sure I'll look into what I actually haven't done yet. Or I can make more support/civilian planes, the few times I did that it was actually pretty fun
@232287168147825 it's been a while since your reply so idk if you can reply to this, but can anything be done about the text labels just being pink boxes?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 no tags, plane in the background has been up for months now lol (though I may do a detailing update centered around the cockpit and canopy for Christmas, so I guess I can tag you for that?)
@Apollo018362 bit more s "low observable" but I think it can count, from a certain point of view (exposed bolts and the like can be chalked up to them being prototypes, but the straight ducts are indeed atrocious)
@Somedumbguy content, though he seems to have toned it down a bit after I and some others began calling him out on it (he blocked me though). He slightly modifies other planes, which is fine, but then he circumvents the autocredit system and makes absolutely no mentions of where he got the build. Sometimes he even says stuff like "I made this", "My creation", etc etc making it look like he made it, but yeah I thought I should probably give a heads up to this guy too since this build seems to be the most recent one he's doing it to
This is really cool, I was pulling some pretty fun maneuvers in it last night
+1@Superliner350 thanks
+1thats awesome, also are you still alive lol
+1@MobileBuilder21 That would be amazing, and thanks
(I tried though and there were some funky hitbox stuff...)
@TheHaggisBasher probably not, im still feeling the burnout sorry
gonna add a gallery of some in-game pictures tomorrow
@MoriSamaSP ended up ultimately not using it, you still wanna see my quick repaint though?
can i modify this for a thumbnail? credits will be given ofc
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 sure, even if I don't use it I might learn something
is it gone?
@SPsidearm what?
Oh in case it wasn't clear enough:
This is a modification of a friend's plane, if you like this please upvote the original too I linked it above
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 click the images or check my profile
@Noname918181818181818181 As you know, I have the tank project and a few aircraft projects (50s/60s strategic bomber, like two aircraft remakes, and probably something I'm forgetting), but sure I'll look into what I actually haven't done yet. Or I can make more support/civilian planes, the few times I did that it was actually pretty fun
@Axartar that's what I've been doing for a while now actually, but every time I come back it's just... that
@232287168147825 it's been a while since your reply so idk if you can reply to this, but can anything be done about the text labels just being pink boxes?
having trouble visualizing this, do you have a video?
yeahhhh i think anyone that has SP eventually runs into this problem at some point
Credit Tags 2:
@Dstar300000
Requested tags:
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26
@USAMustang well the company name "CAAC" is clearly a SAAB reference, if that helps
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/04UrfK/CAAC-Strfp-33F
Some bloke is tryna steal this one too now, he always circumvents autocredit so just wanted to let you know
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/Tow4jZ/Y-8-With-Cargo
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 got it, will do if I remember
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 no tags, plane in the background has been up for months now lol (though I may do a detailing update centered around the cockpit and canopy for Christmas, so I guess I can tag you for that?)
@SIRCOMMANDER031 got it, thanks (future variant may just have custom landing gear if I can get it to work)
@YarisSedan didn't feel like making a custom landing gear, but the wheels and shaft are meant to be thicker yes
Still gonna be avalonia if ever
@Apollo018362 bit more s "low observable" but I think it can count, from a certain point of view (exposed bolts and the like can be chalked up to them being prototypes, but the straight ducts are indeed atrocious)
@VarisOnAviation oh mb i misread lol
@AriZola don't worry about it, it's fine
Neat, you make that coat of arms on the tail too? It's pretty good
@Somedumbguy content, though he seems to have toned it down a bit after I and some others began calling him out on it (he blocked me though). He slightly modifies other planes, which is fine, but then he circumvents the autocredit system and makes absolutely no mentions of where he got the build. Sometimes he even says stuff like "I made this", "My creation", etc etc making it look like he made it, but yeah I thought I should probably give a heads up to this guy too since this build seems to be the most recent one he's doing it to
@Tanglednebula19 thought I ought to inform you, but some bloke called John8185 is trying to steal this thing
@SILVERPANZER Thanks for the heads up, but I already told him about it personally too so I think it's fine
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I guess the stars aligned
@TheUltimatePlaneLover thanks
T:
@DrakonDynamics
@MizeaO
@BoredDeffy
@Dannybeuferd
@VarisOnAviation wdym
@NapoleonPizza it sticks around in the jetstream, though it links to the home page instead
@Pnut Thanks, glad you like it
wreckposting
Canard version, cool
I suggest not putting cleavers towards the wingtips, theyre too heavy and would tip the balance too much especially when one of them is fired off
what happened to the newer one
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 yeah but there's no wood in here yet
@Victoriouswings thanks, i kinda just noticed myself
With that said, I shall watch your career with great interest
@VarisOnAviation i just swept the main wings back a lot and then filled the gaps in, but it does look interesting now
how
@MizeaO that nose is what my pencil looks like after my grandpa sharpens it with a knife
@ToeTips awesome, sounds good. Look forward to it