21.2k LieutenantSOT Comments

  • I FOUND IT! HOW TO CARPET BOMB IN SP!!! 4.5 years ago

    @VolcanicAsh sorry, mistook the two lmao

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    Use structural wing

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @Thunderhawk is it a structural wing or a regular wing?

  • Turret Fighter Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @AntiAirNuri
    Hmmm. It participated in SOME aerial combat, it has two turrets and guns in the wings. If I add more guns in the wings and increase them to 20mm, along with an improved main engine, would it work?

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @AntiAirNuri
    Thank you!!!
    Are you thinking of participating?

  • I FOUND IT! HOW TO CARPET BOMB IN SP!!! 4.5 years ago

    @PlayerkGaming and I agree!

  • I FOUND IT! HOW TO CARPET BOMB IN SP!!! 4.5 years ago

    @PlayerkGaming yup! XD
    I want to make my first full interior, and I want to build it like my Super Hawk (the paneling is super easy, just match the panels with the lines of the main fuselage). Except, I have to panel the ENTIRE build, except the engines XD

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @TrojanAircraftSystems fair, fair. I'm cool with that, then!

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @TrojanAircraftSystems I mean, I'd prefer it to look realistic, but... I'll take what I can XD

  • McDonnell Douglas FA-18D TUDM M45-01 4.5 years ago

    One thing I did notice is that the afterburner is slightly off center

  • McDonnell Douglas FA-18D TUDM M45-01 4.5 years ago

    This is extremely well done!

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @VViiMini as I wrote in the rules, no. So have fun!
    My phone can handle a little over 1000 parts max before it starts lagging

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @TrojanAircraftSystems lol, you're good

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    But 130 feet width is still minimum because this is for the massive intercontinental bombers of the early 50s (the b-35, a flying wing had a length of a 53 feet and a wingspan of 130 feet-ish)

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @TrojanAircraftSystems Okay, 50 feet long is the minimum now

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    Thanks! @VeryUnprofession

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @LaBaguette and cool! Yhank you for joining, m8

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @ACEPILOT109 aww, thanks! I might need help depending on how many people join lol

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @ACEPILOT109 okay, cool! Thank you so much if you do. But no pressure

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @TatsuTheDemonLord lmao
    are you participating?

  • Simple Rafale 4.5 years ago

    I'm sorry, but this plane breaks LITERALLY every rule
    It's a great plane, though!
    .
    For one, it is a replica (at least not one that is allowed), and not fictional
    For two, it is not a united states aircraft
    For three, it is not a heavy Bomber
    For four, it was not made anywhere near 1950, or put on the SAC
    For five, it is well below the minimum part part
    For six, it is too small, and does not meet the criteria on that. It does, however, have at least two jet engines
    For seven, it has no form of self defense
    .
    I'm sorry, but this is disqualified

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @TrojanAircraftSystems Y A S

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @Falco7 lol

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @TMach5 cool! Thank you so much

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    Thanks! @ACEPILOT109 @Default4
    .
    Are y'all thinking of joining?

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @Fox00One cool!!! I look forward to seeing your entry :)

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    Thank you so much! @Fox00One

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @MuizTheMobileFriendly Okay! No worries lol. Good luck!

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    Thanks! @TMach5 @MuizTheMobileFriendly
    Are y'all thinking of joining? expectantly taps fingers together
    No pressure ofc XD

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    JUST FYI. THE FINAL DECISION WILL BE MADE BASED ON A FINAL SHOWDOWN, NOT BASED ON THE POINTS.
    The two chosen, however, will be chosen based on points

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 4.5 years ago

    @PapaKernels

  • Navy Specifications Challenge [CANCELED] 4.5 years ago

    @PapaKernels I will give you first place prize as consolation XD
    .
    I am canceling this challenge because this wasn't successful, and I have more motivation for my new challenge
    I anyone else uploads, I will give you 3 upvotes as a thank you

  • TBM XF Propfan 4.5 years ago

    @Astro12 thanks!

  • Prop Fighter Challenge. [closed] 4.5 years ago

    @Astro12 lmao. Okay, thank you

  • TBM XF Propfan 4.5 years ago

    @GoldenEagle55 lol, thanks!

  • Prop Fighter Challenge. [closed] 4.5 years ago

    Also, I believe I meant to put kph, not kmh XD

  • Prop Fighter Challenge. [closed] 4.5 years ago

    @Formula350 firstly, km/h (kilometers per hour) are about 2 thirds of an mph (mile per hour)
    Yes, referring back to differences in pressure, the speed of sound changes. At room temperature (say, 71 degrees fahrenheit) and roughly 1 Atmosphere of pressure (sea level), the speed of sound is roughly 789 mph, or about 1270 kmh
    .
    So, Mach one is 1270 kmh at sea level at room temp. If we went to STP (standard temperature and pressure), that would be 1 atmosphere at 0 degrees centigrade. The speed of sound is now much faster, because less temperature means more pressure, and sound is a mechanical force, meaning it is based on the events of physical matter. The easier particles are to bounce from, the quicker it moves. The speed of sound can go upwards of 800 mph. It all depends on everything.

  • TBM XF Propfan 4.5 years ago

    @aaronneit muchas gracias :)

  • TBM XF Propfan 4.5 years ago

    Thanks! @aaronneit

  • TBM XF Propfan 4.5 years ago

    Thanks! @Spenzerointernational

  • TBM XF Propfan 4.5 years ago

    @PapaKernels lmao
    .
    thanks!

  • TBM XF Propfan 4.5 years ago

    @PapaKernels

  • Messerschmitt Bf162 "Jaguar" 4.5 years ago

    @asteroidbook345 that actually is quite fascinating and funny XD
    .
    And this plane is amazing!

  • Prop Fighter Challenge. [closed] 4.5 years ago

    And propfans were originally designed to be able to go up to Mach 0.86

  • Prop Fighter Challenge. [closed] 4.5 years ago

    Uh, just a clarification, you say that planes cannot go over 1000 kmh, and mine reaches 1100 kmh, or higher in a dive. Is that okay?
    .
    To add on, it is a Propfan aircraft, which is TECHNICALLY a turboprop

  • Pembroke P-5 pelican 4.5 years ago

    @PapaKernels lol, you're fine
    .
    And that's cool! Can't wait to see what your idea is

  • Pembroke P-5 pelican 4.5 years ago

    The foot pedals are weird, but I inverted one of them so they work now 😂
    .
    Beyond that, this plane is really cool. It looks simple from the outside, but she has an amazing interior, and I love the moving canopy and flight controls. Great plane.
    One thing I wish it had was actual moving ailerons, but other than that, amazing

  • Major Industries L-64 Mouse 4.5 years ago

    Besides landing, this plane is amazing! I love it. It's like an off-brand Skyhawk (in a good way)

  • Major Industries L-64 Mouse 4.5 years ago

    Awesome! I think this is really dope

  • I won't be very active for some time 4.5 years ago

    Good job on gold!!!