21.2k LieutenantSOT Comments

  • [1917] de Bruyere C.1 ''White Knight'' (CAS) 3.9 years ago

    @Formula350 this is cool!!
    I'm assuming you saw mine? XD
    .
    Yeah... it's a pain in the butt, but a cool plane nonetheless. Good job!

  • Sopwith "Backwards Jack" 3.9 years ago

    Thanks!! @PapaKernels @aaronneit

    +1
  • Sopwith "Backwards Jack" 3.9 years ago

    @MAHADI which fuselage blocks? But thanks for the feedback

  • Sopwith "Backwards Jack" 3.9 years ago

    Thanks! @AWESOMENESS360

  • Sopwith "Backwards Jack" 3.9 years ago

    Also, sorry the screenshots are so bad
    My phone glitched as I was uploading, and it wouldn't let me see what pictures I was taking until I actually took them. Even after maneuvering them around, apparently they still were different. So... I dunno lol

  • Sopwith "Backwards Jack" 3.9 years ago

    @PapaKernels
    @MAHADI

  • SPVR Update - Labels 3.9 years ago

    This is amazing!!

  • SPVR Update - Labels 3.9 years ago

    @CG37Official huh? XD

  • New Moderator 3.9 years ago

    Maybe I can't use that phrase because I'm not one... but congrats!!

  • New Moderator 3.9 years ago

    Welcome aboard, mate!

  • WWI Challenge [CLOSED] 3.9 years ago

    You know what... I'm in. I want to build something good before the update comes

    +1
  • [TEASER] hot babes omg 3.9 years ago

    TTTTTTT
    .
    Les Concorde

  • SPCS Naval Challenge: Finally Judged 3.9 years ago

    Yeahh.. I could do so much better now 😂
    Thank you!! And congrats everyone!

    +2
  • today is my birthday 3.9 years ago

    Happy birthday!!

    +1
  • [WIP]B-50 Superfortress(Im leaving for a bit) 3.9 years ago

    @TatsuTheOtaku oh, okay! Sorry, my bad lol

    +1
  • [WIP]B-50 Superfortress(Im leaving for a bit) 3.9 years ago

    @TheDesignate yes. After WW2, the B-29 was retrofitted and redesignated as the B-50. Later, jet engines and some of the first aerial tanking equipment were added. It dropped the Bell X-1, and aided in the production of the XF-85, both of which were meant for the Convair B-36

    +1
  • [WIP]B-50 Superfortress(Im leaving for a bit) 3.9 years ago

    sad face
    I love this plane, and the way you did it, but it sucks you couldn't finish it. It has no payload, and the jet engines are not on it. Of course, the latter isn't necessary, but I would have preferred it. If it doesn't have any weaponry, I cannot include it in the challenge. I would add like 8 500 pound bombs, but I feel that that is unfair for me to edit the craft. I'm sorry, mate

    +1
  • Scout Weka Engine code Demonstration 3.9 years ago

    I made a really simplified version of this a few weeks ago that uses speed as the gear change lol
    .
    Great job!!

    +1
  • TBM XF Propfan 3.9 years ago

    @CursedMikeWazowski thanks! Lol

  • WIP 3.9 years ago

    @mLk yeah! I can't wait to see what you do with this great base

  • Strategic Air Command Challenge 3.9 years ago

    DEADLINE EXTENDED TO SEPTEMBER 10TH. TESTING WILL BEGIN ON THE 11TH

  • Please make a thing where people get 1 dollar every 100 downloads 3.9 years ago

    @DrexxVolv well... just get better

  • Calling all Designers - Question about Nose Design 3.9 years ago

    @WarHawk95 thanks!

  • F-4 phantom 3.9 years ago

    And this looks great!!

    +1
  • F-4 phantom 3.9 years ago

    @JuanNotAnAlt he means make the front of the wing round

  • Calling all Designers - Question about Nose Design 3.9 years ago

    @WarHawk95 okay
    What's your tag, if you don't mind sharing?

  • To Those Interested in Aviation 3.9 years ago

    @Flewey also, did you go up with your father?

  • To Those Interested in Aviation 3.9 years ago

    @Flewey that's freaking amazing!!!
    .
    Are you able to claim the aircraft and take it with you? Might be able to restore it to airworthy condition. Well, the engine would have to be redone, and a new wing, and lots of paint and new panels, but maybe? XD

  • Calling all Designers - Question about Nose Design 3.9 years ago

    @WarHawk95 this is really random, but in 2023 over spring break (in March), my school is doing a Barcelona/Paris trip. Do you have any advice on Paris?

  • None of my inputs are working even with correctly done ones? Explanaition? 3.9 years ago

    What is wrong?
    .
    What exactly isn't working?

  • Calling all Designers - Question about Nose Design 3.9 years ago

    @WarHawk95 ooh, very true, very true. That idea sounds really good, actually

  • 10k Q&A! 3.9 years ago

    @JuanNotAnAlt difficult tests? Screw it. Let's pull some +9g maneuvers

    +1
  • 10k Q&A! 3.9 years ago

    @JuanNotAnAlt yeah, true
    Northropp didn't present their aircraft at the airshow for the executives, and the YF-22 showed significant everything. For this reason, the YF-22 was chosen over the YF-23
    .
    Theoretically, the YF-23 could have won, but I'm still glad the F-22 did. The plane is really reminiscent of the F-104, and that's a main reason why I want to fly it

  • 10k Q&A! 3.9 years ago

    Fair. The YF-23 was actually predicted to have been able to defeat the F-22, and had similar maneuverability. Probably would have been better, considering its range, speed, and payload were all also considerably better, albeit the aircraft being a little larger
    .
    But I agree. The Raptor is awesome. I hope to fly one when I get into the Air Force

    +1
  • 10k Q&A! 3.9 years ago

    @JuanNotAnAlt :O

  • 10k Q&A! 3.9 years ago

    cats are more quiet and fluffy and nice for cuddling, but they scratch
    .
    Dogs are your best friend, but can get very annoying with their thirst for attention. Gotta love 'em though. Little dogs should cease to exist. They are disgusting creatures

  • 10k Q&A! 3.9 years ago

    @KnightOfRen
    hehehe
    .
    Both

  • Calling all Designers - Question about Nose Design 3.9 years ago

    @JustWingIt Good idea!
    .
    I was actually thinking about this, much like on SimplyPlain's Convair Long Range Bomber for my SAC challenge, but there's one issue: I want to maintain that old B-36 Vibe

    However, this does give me an idea of what to do with the nose. I can elongate it, and make the bottom half glass, with a bomb sight dude, and a radio/radar operator behind them. Almost floating on the glass. With the cockpit up top, more or less like the original one with newer features

    +2
  • 10k Q&A! 3.9 years ago

    F-22 or F-35?

  • To Those Interested in Aviation 3.9 years ago

    @Flewey lmao, awesome!!
    .
    That's super cool though. My uncle might be moving up to SC, near me, and he works on restoring WW2 planes and flying them. He said he wants to take me up in some P-40s. I really hope it works out. Other than that, I've gotten an hour at my local flight academy, and also 1 unmarked hour in an airport in Florida

  • LaCarossant LaC-M70 3.9 years ago

    @Flewey yeah! Of course! She's a nice plane!
    I enjoyed flying her

  • I'm now Platinum. 3.9 years ago

    Congrats!!

  • SPVR Update - Gauges 3.9 years ago

    @CG37Official ahem mods cannot work on mobile per policy with Google Play (and the App Store), and you can't just ask the mods to ban a random player

  • Small Feature Wish List for v1.11 Update 3.9 years ago

    Okay, okay, so this might have to be done in a future update, but hear me out:
    .
    Is it possible to maybe add an rpm system to the engines? That way we can design working gears for said engines.
    Or maybe like instead of the built-in propeller engines, there was one interchangeable engine. It could be a V engine, U engine, Flathead, Inline, Rotary, Wankel Rotary, Radial, that form of thing. Choose how many rows or pistons, the power output, size, RPM control, fuel consumption, and bam! Engine time
    Then you could smack that onto a fuselage and use it. With that, you could select output to a new propeller block that has the same options as the old one, maybe with things like the prop style, blade count, thickness, the hub style, that form of thing. Turboprops could be made by connecting something like the VTOL engine to the prop instead of using a turboprop part, or maybe with a whole new procedural jet engine.
    Along with the new RPM thing, you could add mixture controls as well, like in real aircraft, and control the RPM govenor of the engine, along with things like TurboChargers, and SuperChargers.
    .
    Like my last suggestion, this is all just an idea, not forcing you to build anything. I just think something like this would make builds look a lot better, and it would allow for a lot more realism and control with the build. Thanks

    +13
  • What is the first thing you're going to make when the update comes out? 3.9 years ago

    A B-36 Peacemaker. Full cockpit w/ a flight engineer station (with mixture and throttle), the overhead throttles and ignitions for the jets over the pilot station, the unique pitch control, the whole shazam. Might add gun turrets too
    .
    I also am going to build a remake of my THA-X3 Super Hawk under a new designation, and with some remade parts... and a T-6 Texan II for PapaKernels

    +1