Seriously guys. Hat off to ya
This is all ingenious. I especially love that you can use the built-in parts, or make your own that are interactive. I was going to start building simple pieces to my post-update full interior B-36 project, but the new parts are going to help it so much!! Keep up the amazing work, y'all
@ZeroWithSlashedO I mean, technically you can make that missile through XML, but nonetheless, if there was a heat system from jet engines to make that work, that'd be cool
The calculation time would cause lag though
Alright, this will likely be my last challenge for a very long time. I have almost no time to finish grading challenges, and time has FLOWN. I'm going to work on grading the last entries today, and give the Forum out by this Friday
Sorry, I know this has probably already been asked for, but I think that having an expanded amount of AG groups will be SUPER beneficial. Maybe even 2 more would help a ton, 4 at best
I think it would help a lot of people add some cool features for VR players as well, having more levers and buttons to press for them
@PapaKernels Me-172? XD
If I learned how to make the rockets function on their own, I will do it. I have an idea for it, actually
.
And the salamander is badass. Probably will pick one of the three Messerscmitt aircraft you said. I MIGHT do the Bleriot XI
@PapaKernels hah. Noob. 600 parts?
.
Kidding lol
.
Also, awesome aircraft!! My engine came out WAYY too big in order to be made into a plane lol. Also, not meaning to criticize your aircraft, but those nacelles look more like they are for radial engines. Piston engines usually are put in boxes. But either way, great aircraft!!
I JUST THOUGHT OF ONE.
.
I think one thing that's a tad annoying are mirroring the rotators. For one, if it is vertical along the mirror axis, it sometimes makes a copy in the same place, but that's beyond the point
Mirroring roll rotators. The rotators mirror the control on the rotator. I feel like if the rotator was set to roll, it would be a lot better to have it not mirror, that way it is easier to work with in the wing building stage of the aircraft
In regards to the engine.
.
You may need to add an intake in the opposite direction, and nudge it into the fuselage in order for the engine to breathe if that is the issue
Yes, this community has recently gotten a bunch of pricks (most of which are under the allowed age on this site, based on their speech patterns), but there are some nice people. I like to consider myself a nice person, and I will help to the best of my abilities. But please don't be rude like some of the others
@pianoplanepianorocket @Clutch
Okay, okay. First off, I WAS trying to help. If you look below, I simply asked what they tried doing. Instead of giving me an answer, they simply (and quite rudely) stated "help me." I'm here on my own will. If you want help, I'll give it. But you don't make the demands. If you have a question, simply ask. Because I have no knowledge of what they are trying to do, I can't do more than give a basic idea of how to do it
@pianoplanepianorocket so there are two simple ways. Either way, you'll need 2 engines at least (assuming it is a single engine aircraft)
.
As Rexzion (rudely) phrased, you can put a jet engine backwards that activates on an activation group rather than by throttle as the input
.
An easier way, assuming you know a bit of XML, you can go into the XML, and put the thrust multiplier on one of the jet engines to negative, still leaving the other engine off because of throttle when that one is on. I hope this helps
Seriously guys. Hat off to ya
+1This is all ingenious. I especially love that you can use the built-in parts, or make your own that are interactive. I was going to start building simple pieces to my post-update full interior B-36 project, but the new parts are going to help it so much!! Keep up the amazing work, y'all
It even looks BETTER!! This is absolutely amazing
THIS IS AMAZING
Looks nice XD
Honestly, it's really good. I prefer cheese any day, but Hawaiian style pizza is good
+4@Sm10684 lmao. I feel that
Yeah. And furthermore, how realistic is your aircraft?
+3@FeatherWing lmao
@ZeroWithSlashedO I mean, technically you can make that missile through XML, but nonetheless, if there was a heat system from jet engines to make that work, that'd be cool
+2The calculation time would cause lag though
If I ever could, I want to restore the B-36 at PIMA to airworthy condition. Or at the very least, own a WW2 warbird
@Flewey fair lol. I completely get that
🤤
+1Will there be camera changing in VR?
+1This is more of a question than anything
@PapaKernels nice!
+1@PapaKernels lol
.
Also, are you still submitting yours?
@TheUnionOfOnions ahhhhh
Think not! For nuclear weapons are the safety of death. Your teacher mustn't know... >:)
TTTTTT
+1Thanks! @BeastHunter
+1@PapaKernels
Alright, this will likely be my last challenge for a very long time. I have almost no time to finish grading challenges, and time has FLOWN. I'm going to work on grading the last entries today, and give the Forum out by this Friday
Sorry, I know this has probably already been asked for, but I think that having an expanded amount of AG groups will be SUPER beneficial. Maybe even 2 more would help a ton, 4 at best
+17I think it would help a lot of people add some cool features for VR players as well, having more levers and buttons to press for them
@ReinMcDeer @AWESOMENESS360
+1Cool! It will likely be a few weeks though lol. I'm waiting on the update. I just wanted to make sure aforehand
@PapaKernels Me-172? XD
+1If I learned how to make the rockets function on their own, I will do it. I have an idea for it, actually
.
And the salamander is badass. Probably will pick one of the three Messerscmitt aircraft you said. I MIGHT do the Bleriot XI
@PapaKernels
RIP
I need to finish my build for this challenge lol
+2OH CRAP
+1@PapaKernels hah. Noob. 600 parts?
+1.
Kidding lol
.
Also, awesome aircraft!! My engine came out WAYY too big in order to be made into a plane lol. Also, not meaning to criticize your aircraft, but those nacelles look more like they are for radial engines. Piston engines usually are put in boxes. But either way, great aircraft!!
NOTE: All who have requested a tag will be tagged on a new post of this when the update releases (which will be when I actually start building this)
I am just letting you know
.
@ReinMcDeer
@AWESOMENESS360
would you guys like to be tagged as well?
This is awesome!!!
T
V-tail F-35?
All of these will be in the game. It's one part that can be changed into anything
+1Also, just FYI, the Raptor does NOT have roll vectoring. Just pitch at 20 degrees
LET'S GOOOO
Republic of China
OH
Just to clarify, what's ROC?
Much pogger
+1I'll try again, is that better? I will get you again one day >:)
@CC1010 sorry ;)
@V lmao same
+4.
So, class. Today we will be attempting to make a small air-
I MADE A BIRDIE
@CC1010 CLICKY
I'm gonna ask my Physics teacher next year about this >:)
+1I JUST THOUGHT OF ONE.
+2.
I think one thing that's a tad annoying are mirroring the rotators. For one, if it is vertical along the mirror axis, it sometimes makes a copy in the same place, but that's beyond the point
Mirroring roll rotators. The rotators mirror the control on the rotator. I feel like if the rotator was set to roll, it would be a lot better to have it not mirror, that way it is easier to work with in the wing building stage of the aircraft
In regards to the engine.
.
You may need to add an intake in the opposite direction, and nudge it into the fuselage in order for the engine to breathe if that is the issue
@pianoplanepianorocket
What exactly are you having an issue with?
Yes, this community has recently gotten a bunch of pricks (most of which are under the allowed age on this site, based on their speech patterns), but there are some nice people. I like to consider myself a nice person, and I will help to the best of my abilities. But please don't be rude like some of the others
+3@pianoplanepianorocket @Clutch
Okay, okay. First off, I WAS trying to help. If you look below, I simply asked what they tried doing. Instead of giving me an answer, they simply (and quite rudely) stated "help me." I'm here on my own will. If you want help, I'll give it. But you don't make the demands. If you have a question, simply ask. Because I have no knowledge of what they are trying to do, I can't do more than give a basic idea of how to do it
@pianoplanepianorocket so there are two simple ways. Either way, you'll need 2 engines at least (assuming it is a single engine aircraft)
.
As Rexzion (rudely) phrased, you can put a jet engine backwards that activates on an activation group rather than by throttle as the input
.
An easier way, assuming you know a bit of XML, you can go into the XML, and put the thrust multiplier on one of the jet engines to negative, still leaving the other engine off because of throttle when that one is on. I hope this helps
@Clutch I actually wasn't trying to make fun of them XD
I was trying to help