@DanDaFreakinMan I would say you could change the Hinge rotators for a less extreme pitch Control, but remember that you gotta have the same total values on the neck and tail, let's say the neck hinges are all on 10 degrees, that's 40 degrees total, so the Tail must have 40 degrees too.
@DanDaFreakinMan Found the problem, I'm using rotators for the Roll controls, something might have gone wrong and now the left side rotators aren't turning opposite to the one on the right.
Change the "Invert" option on the left rotators to "yes", it should do it.
@SPairforce It's because this thing makes me angry, because of an in-joke this thing gets +150 upvotes and at least 20 spotlights, while me and many other mid-skilled creators get barely 10 upvotes for something we tried out best to look good.
@Diloph Honestly I didn't think I would have made such a strange design with just the old original blocks, thanks for the challenge.
I'll be later be uploading a different design to this one I originally started with, but considered too big for the challenge, of course, it's won't be a challenge entry.
@GiuliMBorgesYT Ah, certo, as Únicas superfícies aerodinâmicas são as asas bem de fora, a placas que ligam as fuselagens não tem física de voo aplicada, ou pelo menos não deveriam ter.
What's the difference between this and the original one?
@18211292358 Uh, yes, congratulations you can discern two completely different aircrafts.
@DanDaFreakinMan I would say you could change the Hinge rotators for a less extreme pitch Control, but remember that you gotta have the same total values on the neck and tail, let's say the neck hinges are all on 10 degrees, that's 40 degrees total, so the Tail must have 40 degrees too.
@DanDaFreakinMan Found the problem, I'm using rotators for the Roll controls, something might have gone wrong and now the left side rotators aren't turning opposite to the one on the right.
Change the "Invert" option on the left rotators to "yes", it should do it.
Why some XML codes lack Default values?
+1@BigChunguss Sorry, but this wasn't the one I entered, this one was a mistake, I entered the Heinrack P-103.
@FLOWRIDER0 In space, no one can hear the gunshot.
Shouldn't it have the Black Boobomb insignia? I mean Pink Boobombs only launch Mario around.
@Diloph No, I should've explained better.
"Also your the first person I saw who used the right (too)"
Is there a word missing between "right" and "(too)"?
@SPairforce It's because this thing makes me angry, because of an in-joke this thing gets +150 upvotes and at least 20 spotlights, while me and many other mid-skilled creators get barely 10 upvotes for something we tried out best to look good.
+5@TurtlesThatFly Seems comprehensive enough, what a hell show.
This thing doesn't deserve this amount of attention for such a retarded joke.
+2@Diloph Right... What?
Use Fuselage Cylinders, they give you more freedom of shaping the aircraft and can give you more fuel.
@EternalDarkness What exactly is happening here? Why is this thing getting so many upvotes?
Who let this happen?
+2@Diloph this is the other aircraft I mentioned.
@Diloph Honestly I didn't think I would have made such a strange design with just the old original blocks, thanks for the challenge.
I'll be later be uploading a different design to this one I originally started with, but considered too big for the challenge, of course, it's won't be a challenge entry.
Why was this challenge spotlighted AFTER it finished?
Looks great, the intakes could be bit more open tho.
+1So... Why exactly we don't have that here?
+8@Raptor77 Will test out later, thanks for chiming in.
@Raptor77 Where's your aircraft? I try to access it but the site only says it was removed.
@BnanaX Ah tem, BR ta em tudo que é quanto.
Brasileiro é Cidadão do Mundo.
@GiuliMBorgesYT Ah, certo, as Únicas superfícies aerodinâmicas são as asas bem de fora, a placas que ligam as fuselagens não tem física de voo aplicada, ou pelo menos não deveriam ter.
+1@GiuliMBorgesYT sou Brasileiro também.
@GiuliMBorgesYT Ah, sério? Beleza então, pode me explicar em Português.
Wing roots need to be smaller, and the Tail needs to be closed.
But, over all, it's good.
@GiuliMBorgesYT I can do the first thing, but lack knowledge of what the second means.
@GiuliMBorgesYT I guess you're right.
What could I have done to "unfloppy" it?
Why don't you try finding a few challenges? There's always one or two happening.
@GiuliMBorgesYT Sorry for the lacking Flying Capabilities.
Was it mostly due to the take off procedures? I have now written instructions for it.
Did you take this from a Cursed Aircraft subreddit?
@LlamatheNerd no problem.
Best solution would be to hide vertical surfaces inside the fuselages.
The Cockpit and Nose look a bit wonky, but it looks overall good.
Start using Fuselage cylinders.
+2You never announced who won, right?
@Shadowed Not OP, but, c'mon, Russian Sukhois are skinny beauties.
+1What's that thing on it's back?
+1What counts as fuselage? Are blocks allowed? Hollow Fuselages, I guess doesn't count?
@ZZking That's just strange.
@ZZking The problem is that even though everything is clip into each, nothing is connected, you'll need to re-do it all.
I have a question, did it veer off to the left that much when you first downloaded it?
Looks like those Egg Aircraft Models.
Needs a better Sukhoi Neck, Rule of Thumb, most popular Sukhois have the Cockpit area way above the Wings and Body.
@Thelionslipstonight I also have one in 16 parts.
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/924m4T/F-16-in-16-parts
Needs some finer detailing, but it looks good.
For "roleplay" reasons, I personally would change the V-Tail to a H-Tail, because the Jet exhaust would obviously melt the V-Tail out.
@Iar4xc No worries.
+1Uh... isn't the MiG-31 denomination already used with the Foxhound?
+1C H O N K
+1