I could see you doing a Tumbler inspired vehicle with this.
https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/batman/images/5/57/Thedarkknight17po4.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20240705235837
@SimpleSquareManufacturer Sorry if it was supposed to be a joke, but, making fuselage wings look good is actually a hard thing for the average joe, like me.
@ChrisETH First: if you're gonna enumerate stuff, do it more than just once.
Second: About "Where did 68% come from?", at least that clears it up.
Third: Again, my original comment is not insult to him but his work, why do you keep twisting it as me insulting him personally? Unless you also want me to twist your criticism into you attack me, not my modified F4U-4.
Fourth: I did not say it was tremendous work, don't know where you got that from, after all it was a 67 word brief version of, I don't know, 10 minutes? Although the last is true, if you download the aircraft, you'll see it's already full of fuel, something I always do, because I'm not looking to make realist aircraft, for the most part, just what I picture in my mind.
Fifth: If we're gonna argue about how much changed on both aircraft, then you need to agree that I changed this F4U-4 more.
Again, his removal of 48 parts in a 1.143 parts aircraft isn't enough for a full submission, he probably could've take out much more detailing.
He wanted to make that plane better for higher end phones, what phone did he use? If his phone is powerful enough for a 1.095 parts planes, I'd like to know how much difference those 48 parts really did, did it increase his FPS by 3 frames?
Sixth: It was an "insult" from the beginning, when I saw my comment pinned, I became confused, as normally that's used for more positive or important comments, not a "You barely changed it, why did you upload it?" comment.
Seventh: As a player just starting out, he should have started making his own planes, make a new A-10, not get an aircraft from a more experienced player and re-upload it with little modification.
Sus door.
+2Putting the Fat in Fat Amy.
You know the retardant tank is too big right?
The back wheels aren't touching the ground.
And none of the flare pads seen connected.
Question, should it really lose control while taking off?
It really wants to go right even after the back well comes off from the ground.
Found the issue, put the back wheel at X -0.2650, and it will go straight.
Sad that you didn't make water landable.
I'm rather unsure on what to do.
I have two already made aircraft that follow this either, but I don't know which one is more cursed, a Typhoon combo or a Scorpion combo.
+1@SPTNR Because Monarchii did the best good job with just 10 parts?
What is this brainrot.
@BaconAircraft is there a way to link this plane (https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/V16VR5/F98) as a predecessor to my plane?
Hi, would this work?
https://www.simpleplanes.com/a/OHpOC6/East-German-Flagon
This twisted game needs to be reset.
Why is the minimum 87 parts?
Is that how many parts you need for a Brazilian flag or something?
+1@Luminaria Thanks
Looks cute.
Now you can plant twice the amount of pilots into the ground at once.
+1Can I get a source on that cropped anime girl?
Who's that on the UFP?
@ReynaldoIndustries what I meant it that looks like a Mig-31 body with F-15 wings.
F-15 Foxhound.
+1Predecessor means it came before.
Sucessor means it came after.
Welcome back, I guess.
+3Heads-up, recheck the rotators in the control surfaces.
While pitching, the canards are going the wrong way.
While rolling, the canards are going the same way.
Mig-15 in 15 parts, that's amazing.
+1Please, start learning how to use fuselage cylinders.
I see now, he switched visibleInDesigner= to false in the xml file
How did you do that with the 3 view image screen?
@Graingy Good, he has good taste.
+1I could see you doing a Tumbler inspired vehicle with this.
+1https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/batman/images/5/57/Thedarkknight17po4.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20240705235837
Is it me, or is one of the wings more swept back?
Also, start using the fuselage cylinders.
Newest development from Pixar Industries:
+3@sussybaka98198 Yeah, maybe this name has aged a bit badly.
It was more like Ursa Minor you know.
(praying hands emoji)
+3I have a F-16 in 16 Parts, I have a parasite plane in 10 parts, and another low part aircraft with 8 parts.
Thanks @TheMouse.
Thunderblot.
+2Who the hell spotlit this old thing?
So, the final update for SP are 3 levers?
Incredibly sad and disappointing.
That it for a beta?
3 switches? Expected more from this huge hiatus SP got from the Dev Team.
+4@MrShenanigans Just did it, thanks for reminding me.
@MrShenanigans fictional.
I believe I have joined already, but I should've said it earlier.
@MrShenanigans Oh hi, thanks for that, but, uh, I just uploaded a better version, so forget this one, please.
Where is the Betty in the picture you put on the description?
@WarshipDude If it has a tail like that, it's a Sukhoi.
@SimpleSquareManufacturer Sorry if it was supposed to be a joke, but, making fuselage wings look good is actually a hard thing for the average joe, like me.
+1In general is looks pretty good.
I would advise you to maybe shorten it a bit, that nose looks took long for example.
I guess the front landing gear looks pretty nice.
Okay, who's gonna be the mad man that will pull off some of Trigger's maneuvers in it?
-> Fixed bug where some crafts would explode when dropping bombs due to ghost collisions.
Was that why my small carpet bombing aircraft was blowing up for no reason?
But, why?
@ChrisETH First: if you're gonna enumerate stuff, do it more than just once.
Second: About "Where did 68% come from?", at least that clears it up.
Third: Again, my original comment is not insult to him but his work, why do you keep twisting it as me insulting him personally? Unless you also want me to twist your criticism into you attack me, not my modified F4U-4.
Fourth: I did not say it was tremendous work, don't know where you got that from, after all it was a 67 word brief version of, I don't know, 10 minutes? Although the last is true, if you download the aircraft, you'll see it's already full of fuel, something I always do, because I'm not looking to make realist aircraft, for the most part, just what I picture in my mind.
Fifth: If we're gonna argue about how much changed on both aircraft, then you need to agree that I changed this F4U-4 more.
Again, his removal of 48 parts in a 1.143 parts aircraft isn't enough for a full submission, he probably could've take out much more detailing.
He wanted to make that plane better for higher end phones, what phone did he use? If his phone is powerful enough for a 1.095 parts planes, I'd like to know how much difference those 48 parts really did, did it increase his FPS by 3 frames?
Sixth: It was an "insult" from the beginning, when I saw my comment pinned, I became confused, as normally that's used for more positive or important comments, not a "You barely changed it, why did you upload it?" comment.
Seventh: As a player just starting out, he should have started making his own planes, make a new A-10, not get an aircraft from a more experienced player and re-upload it with little modification.