@ACEVIPER9710 oohh lmao. I do have a sub assembly part of one, but that means the part count will go up to 800. Which is likely to overheat most mobile user phones.
@ACEVIPER9710 theres no way this build of mine is 50 parts only lmao. What i meant was, make it bearable for mobile users to be able to download and play it while experiencing lag at a minimum. Ive been there so i know how its like, even today.
@ollielebananiaCFSP guess ill try submitting my P-47D-25 then
.
Edit: oh wait, its a 2nd Gen, jet... Hmm, i do have soemthing i was working on and released when i reach platinum... Guess ill submit that when i do reach platinum before thr deadline.
@Kangy i do use war thunder for roll and pitch for reference.
.
The trouble for me is the artificial Weight and drag. But i guess ill keep tinkering on it for the variant with cockpit intruments.
@Kangy the "guesses" part was meant for the roll and turn rate., As for the acceleration part. Its either/both the game's weird drag system or/and how the aircraft is 800kg or more, lighter.
.
The engine's horsepower even is already up to the historical one (1990hp), and i believe maoing the aircraft heavier will just make it feel less manuverable. Messing with its current weight also messes up its trim stability pretty badly, it wont fly at level at all.
@Kangy i only had my guesses as to how it should perform like, it being japanese made me think it should have great turn rate and roll rate. I also heard that the Hayate is fast and agile. Although, it does turn way too well, so i could update the XML file.
@JustDragon i doubt ill be the first too, the big guys(platinum users) have yet to come in, and im sure theyre taking their sweet time on building their replicas.
@OUGHTO that would be thanks to OllielebananiaCFSP for thinking of such background. And ye same, just like my previous builds, i cant take my eyes not stare at it in awe lol.
@Something5353 ah, so its gonna be another post.... Though, i heard you can just access aircrafts posts through "favorites" section in your acc through VR.
@Bryan5 yeh, the last "decently looking" defiant post before this one is like 3.7 Years ago. This build of mine should bring justice with how much time and "tech" went on over the past years of updates and development. So i expect someone to make a whole lot detailed and better than this build of mine in the upcoming future.
@FarrowTECH doesnt mean i cant edit them out to correct my typos xD
Oh and, some of them are just assumptions, like the aft antenna sliding down. I may not be keen on small details but i do sometimes do the mechanisms purely for aesthetics.
@Cereal i use mobile (a somewhat powerful one now) and i know how suffering its like for mobile users. You could say it was a blessing that i didnt do the USN insignia on this build lol
Not sure what my next plan is, the P47D Thunderbolt or the Baulton Paul Defiant with the Auto-Aim and Camera-Aim featuee. The latter sounds interesting as it has like 270° turning arc for the turret. And it isnt that popular.
I like how theres a bunch of gold users upvotes in a long line, and then one platinum ruins it lol
+1@ACEVIPER9710 oohh lmao. I do have a sub assembly part of one, but that means the part count will go up to 800. Which is likely to overheat most mobile user phones.
+2@ACEVIPER9710 theres no way this build of mine is 50 parts only lmao. What i meant was, make it bearable for mobile users to be able to download and play it while experiencing lag at a minimum. Ive been there so i know how its like, even today.
+1@OUGHTO i wanna make it mobile friendly, so i left it out
+1I am so sorry for breaking the 69th upvote
+3Whew, it looks like a Japanese Airacobra lol
@GrandPrix Something along the lines of making the nose aerodynamic togrther with being able to fit the 37mm gun on the nose, like the Bf-109.
+1Whew nice, especially that space for the landing gear on the wings. I could learn a thing or more from it for my future builds.
+1Sadly i cant download it because itll overheat my phone up on that part count lol.
Though i can see that you added some details such as cowl flaps and engine details.
@Ambs ofc you can.
@SAT0rii ive been using the wing modelling for over q year now, and it wasnt until recently that i figured out the way to calculate it.
Yes, i forgot to put the USAF on my part lol
+2Did i just discovered basic NACA Airfoils in SP?
@Grob0s0VBRa ah, the wing thickness. Yeah indeed it is. It can be the same on thr opposite where it thickens up too.
+2@Grob0s0VBRa by mean "fuselage with circular corners", did you meant the wingtips?
+1@EternalDarkness i finally have a way to calculate the height thickness of the upper and lower back fuselages
@Vincent could you make this a successor to this post?
+1@ollielebananiaCFSP guess ill try submitting my P-47D-25 then
.
Edit: oh wait, its a 2nd Gen, jet... Hmm, i do have soemthing i was working on and released when i reach platinum... Guess ill submit that when i do reach platinum before thr deadline.
Definitely not something i can compete in considering im bad at making cockpit intruments, and flight performances being 100+kph faster on sea level.
+1@Kangy i do use war thunder for roll and pitch for reference.
+1.
The trouble for me is the artificial Weight and drag. But i guess ill keep tinkering on it for the variant with cockpit intruments.
@Kangy the "guesses" part was meant for the roll and turn rate., As for the acceleration part. Its either/both the game's weird drag system or/and how the aircraft is 800kg or more, lighter.
+1.
The engine's horsepower even is already up to the historical one (1990hp), and i believe maoing the aircraft heavier will just make it feel less manuverable. Messing with its current weight also messes up its trim stability pretty badly, it wont fly at level at all.
Why not submit it for Chii's dogfight challenge?
Bringd me nostalgia of when i first started SP and this is the plane i first built lol
+1@Farewellntchii i updated the XML file of the plane, i nerfed its turn rate so you might have to redownload it for the "combat" test
+1@Kangy i only had my guesses as to how it should perform like, it being japanese made me think it should have great turn rate and roll rate. I also heard that the Hayate is fast and agile. Although, it does turn way too well, so i could update the XML file.
+1@JustDragon i doubt ill be the first too, the big guys(platinum users) have yet to come in, and im sure theyre taking their sweet time on building their replicas.
+1Challenge host tag:
@Farewellntchii
@IceCraftGaming some really amazing ones get featured sometimes. Its just replicas are more manageable to build.
+1@OUGHTO that would be thanks to OllielebananiaCFSP for thinking of such background. And ye same, just like my previous builds, i cant take my eyes not stare at it in awe lol.
From "game within a game" to "an app within a game". This truely is the definition of "Simpleplanes".
+1@aLansenFanNamedHusky here after it blew up
+2I actually made a mistake, its not "Philip James Saunders", but "Philip James (H) Sanders".
Source
link for version that doesnt crash the game
@Something5353 ah, so its gonna be another post.... Though, i heard you can just access aircrafts posts through "favorites" section in your acc through VR.
+2@Bryan5 yeh, the last "decently looking" defiant post before this one is like 3.7 Years ago. This build of mine should bring justice with how much time and "tech" went on over the past years of updates and development. So i expect someone to make a whole lot detailed and better than this build of mine in the upcoming future.
+2@FarrowTECH doesnt mean i cant edit them out to correct my typos xD
Oh and, some of them are just assumptions, like the aft antenna sliding down. I may not be keen on small details but i do sometimes do the mechanisms purely for aesthetics.
+2@RamboJutter snowflakes gonna be snowflakes i guess. And considering how hes silver tag. Probly never knew its fine to make them in the plane.
@HololiveFan i thought swastikas arent prohibited as long as its replicas builds purpose only
@BogdanX yeh, i should have downloaded a curveable one on the website. And scale it up/down to match it.
My only concern was the part count possibly making the aircraft go up to 660+.
+2@MrCOPTY Maybe you should add "no repost", like how i made the FW190 a year ago and could repost it for this challengr
@CN0703 this one should work as someone fixed it for some of us.
@beenz Give me the blueprint you used on thid aircraft and i might rebuild its wings for you.
+1Im sure people who hate anime will turn this as their target practice
+2@ORZpasserAtw sadly no torpedo version as i havw no reference materials and already a bit complicated to fit it in.
+2@ollielebananiaCFSP nah, just let it be.
+1@C47skytrain same goes for my laptop when i try to play it on sandbox, and i have no idea why aswell.
@Lake theres none, i made it on my own, albeit at a not so detailed manner. But this one should be a better option.
+1@Cereal i use mobile (a somewhat powerful one now) and i know how suffering its like for mobile users. You could say it was a blessing that i didnt do the USN insignia on this build lol
+1@Lake This?
+1Not sure what my next plan is, the P47D Thunderbolt or the Baulton Paul Defiant with the Auto-Aim and Camera-Aim featuee. The latter sounds interesting as it has like 270° turning arc for the turret. And it isnt that popular.
+1