@Hedero Thanks mate, It's good to have someone like you supporting a little fella like me. Especially on SP, considering I'm a silver user, I'd think you have better people to go and chat with. I really thank you for spending time chatting me, Knowing I've got the attention of a well respected builder in this community makes me feel quite happy. I'm hoping my boomerang goes well, but I don't think it will because I don't have custom screenshots and stuff to make it look good. But who cares, I should focus on building something that I think is really realistic, not what others think is.
@Hedero oh sick! I'll try it out soon, I've been working on two Aussie planes, and they're replica too! I'm hoping they go well, I've worked really hard on them but they still have a while to go. They will both have custom cockpits and custom control surfaces. Hopefully some interactive instruments too. BTW The first one is a CAC Boomerang which might go on hold for a bit as my school is coming back tomorrow, and the second is the CAC CA-25 Winjeel which is aboriginal for 'Young Eagle' as it was used as a Trainer from 1955 - 1975 and moved to a forward air control role until 1994.
Anyways enough blabbering from me you probably won't care much...
@Hedero Oh so there's just a very smol wing in there which generates lift for you, does it have a control surface on it or no? btw i can't fly rn I don't have my iPad w me
@Hedero Nah I think your builds are fantastic, because they're simple. Not over complicated and bring to it too many parts. Also I've meant to ask for a while, How do you make those fuselage flaps with the drag on?
Eh, I’m not sure I’m up for it yet, it doesn’t really suit my style of building for now... But yeah I might have a shot someday. To be honest, I’d rather built a CAC mustang. @Raichu047
It’s possibly because of the shocks, which aren’t really supposed to be used in cramped spaces like your landing gear, instead just use the wheel’s suspension model, it makes life way easier. @BOXboy
@XxVirginMary42069xX The fact that you went to a nearly 4 year old build and found a comment that is 9 months old and targeted that person tells me that you don't belong here... don't cause drama.
@WarHawk95 Terrific Build, like EternalDarkness said a bit too manouvrable for a Harvard but it looks bloody lovely. I'd use that FT input I put in my previous comment. Quick build suggestion, I think you should try the Wirraway, as it is basically a Harvard but it has a tail gunner and has support for a couple of Bombs.
@Panthers4741 Yeah, because Wings don't have the xml value min or max wings control input becomes the min or max so basically with @asteroidbook345 clamp(VTOL, -1, 0) It's telling the control surface it only responds if the VTOL is slid down.
@XxVirginMary42069xX Can you read english? I just said it's a bit laggy for lower end devices so I've simply asked Beluga to remove some parts to lower the part count.
Love this build, is it possible for you to make a lower part count version where you remove some of the interior stuff but keep the cockpit and airbrakes?
Pretty cool, but why would this have flares? If it has flares it should at least have chaff, otherwise radar missiles would kill this thing in a heartbeat.
@Rodrigo110 It's a varient of the original one, not sure why he didn't just make this unlisted and link to it in the original but who cares, it's pretty cool.
@MiladicPlanes What I mean is, Custom control surfaces have to have drag modified fuselages. So with the rules of this challenge I won't be able to make them
Thanks @theunknown
Btw i like your Mini Moke, My mum's parents had one when she was a kid and she thought it was really cool to see one in SP
Just one thing, never use a jet engine in place for a prop engine. That is bad in my books, And I wouldn’t touch the throttle governor either.
That means the world mate. Thanks, you know what, I don’t care if it does trashy. So long as you like it I’d be happy. @Hedero
Lol it’s only a few points no need. Also this was quite helpful. @ThomasRoderick
+1Thanks @ThomasRoderick You've made my day! :)
+1woah this is very cool! Very different
@Hedero Thanks mate, It's good to have someone like you supporting a little fella like me. Especially on SP, considering I'm a silver user, I'd think you have better people to go and chat with. I really thank you for spending time chatting me, Knowing I've got the attention of a well respected builder in this community makes me feel quite happy. I'm hoping my boomerang goes well, but I don't think it will because I don't have custom screenshots and stuff to make it look good. But who cares, I should focus on building something that I think is really realistic, not what others think is.
@Hedero oh sick! I'll try it out soon, I've been working on two Aussie planes, and they're replica too! I'm hoping they go well, I've worked really hard on them but they still have a while to go. They will both have custom cockpits and custom control surfaces. Hopefully some interactive instruments too. BTW The first one is a CAC Boomerang which might go on hold for a bit as my school is coming back tomorrow, and the second is the CAC CA-25 Winjeel which is aboriginal for 'Young Eagle' as it was used as a Trainer from 1955 - 1975 and moved to a forward air control role until 1994.
Anyways enough blabbering from me you probably won't care much...
@Hedero Oh so there's just a very smol wing in there which generates lift for you, does it have a control surface on it or no? btw i can't fly rn I don't have my iPad w me
Well done @fuyun
This build is great, Custom cockpit, Custom Control surfaces, and a somewhat nice part count.
@TheSavageManZ Oh I know that now...
I know I haven't seen it yet,
+1but when it's savage boi
it deserves an u🅱doot
@Hedero Nah I think your builds are fantastic, because they're simple. Not over complicated and bring to it too many parts. Also I've meant to ask for a while, How do you make those fuselage flaps with the drag on?
@DOX Fantastic build. Nice swing wing too!
This looks way better than what it was going to look like. Fantastic job as always @Hedero
@WarHawk95 yeah that's cool, it's almost the same thing. Man i hate the lack of Aussie planes on SP
+1Eh, I’m not sure I’m up for it yet, it doesn’t really suit my style of building for now... But yeah I might have a shot someday. To be honest, I’d rather built a CAC mustang. @Raichu047
It’s possibly because of the shocks, which aren’t really supposed to be used in cramped spaces like your landing gear, instead just use the wheel’s suspension model, it makes life way easier. @BOXboy
Crucial error, you didn’t disable drag on the wings, this makes the plane do some weird stuff. @BOXboy
Pretty nice for a low point player. You’re getting places
Btw if you use the smooth function it means it can go both ways but it has realistic speed. @Panthers4741
Idk if I can enter the challenge, I might be able to but we’ll see. @Panthers4741
@switdog08 No problem, you deserve it :)
@Panthers4741 Maybe, but I'd use
clamp(VTOL, -1, 0)I think it's better, beecause that command is allowing the flaps to move both up and down.@XxVirginMary42069xX The fact that you went to a nearly 4 year old build and found a comment that is 9 months old and targeted that person tells me that you don't belong here... don't cause drama.
@Notnoob1000 oh ok in that case, I'd like to see her do better...
@WarHawk95 Terrific Build, like EternalDarkness said a bit too manouvrable for a Harvard but it looks bloody lovely. I'd use that FT input I put in my previous comment. Quick build suggestion, I think you should try the Wirraway, as it is basically a Harvard but it has a tail gunner and has support for a couple of Bombs.
@Panthers4741 Yeah, because Wings don't have the xml value
minormaxwings control input becomes theminormaxso basically with @asteroidbook345clamp(VTOL, -1, 0)It's telling the control surface it only responds if theVTOLis slid down.@XxVirginMary42069xX Can you read english? I just said it's a bit laggy for lower end devices so I've simply asked Beluga to remove some parts to lower the part count.
Love this build, is it possible for you to make a lower part count version where you remove some of the interior stuff but keep the cockpit and airbrakes?
+1Holy cow ur finally back
Im waiting for my description lmao
Need for speed: MosT WanTed
+1Congrats!
Title: Nothing here
+1Me: UWU wats dis?
Awesome cockpit, I wouldn't be able to build something so complex with so little parts
+1Very impressive for a newbie, Nice work :)
Pretty cool, but why would this have flares? If it has flares it should at least have chaff, otherwise radar missiles would kill this thing in a heartbeat.
@Rodrigo110 It's a varient of the original one, not sure why he didn't just make this unlisted and link to it in the original but who cares, it's pretty cool.
@Parehare Only a few models like the D-5 had landing gear...
@Bruher Woah... I didn't expect it to go so well in Overall rating... Thanks so much! I think that was a bit generous of you
One more thing, when is this due? @MiladicPlanes
Thanks for that, I’m an iOS user so I don’t know much about Android. @Sovetzkysoyusz
@Hedero That looks way better. Nice work!
1k parts is nuts, nice work
Why did you make a second one?
@Diloph You didn't put a space in a fair few of your tags, they won't work.
Also thanks for the heads up.
@Hedero Yeah... Basically just try to make the nose look smoother
Pretty cool idea, I like this kind of video, just something weekly to sum up best builds of the week.
+3@MiladicPlanes What I mean is, Custom control surfaces have to have drag modified fuselages. So with the rules of this challenge I won't be able to make them