@TheUltimatePlaneLover @KPLBall Of course you are safe, because if I really want to fight, it's not a small number anymore
Also, remember to indicate the attack location next time because I didn't see it.
To be honest, you scared me to death. I'm already prepared to use the outpost as a second battlefield
@KPLBall Make me laugh so hard. I haven't loaded the picture yet, so I can't see it. Let me ask you - ZG-6A will immediately self destruct when manipulated by AI, so which SAM are you destroying?
@SPsidearm Well... Not really. What I'm saying is that I understand you're tagging someone who made an appointment in advance.
As for M4 and AK... I think we need to consider them based on the current situation, such as the snowy environment in Snowtown
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @TheUltimatePlaneLover The liftscale value of the wing is 2.5 (Normally, it should be taken as 1. Increasing the value can help improve maneuverability), which causes abnormal shaking of the wing after the aircraft enters the water. This bug was caused by some unknown reason. This is my inference conclusion
@Subsere … Have you tested it separately? Your problem is not because two equations are strung together, but because the output value is problematic, even if there is only one of them, it is still the same.
It's quite troublesome for you to change this problem, but now you have two variables in your hand: LandingGear and GearDown, which correspond to four different situations. Then you can change the judgment from the GearDown variable to two variables, corresponding to the situations you want.
The problem is obvious, it's that your numerical value is incorrect. LandingGear only has 0 and 1 two numbers. I suggest you add a judgment on the LandingGear value to determine whether to release or retract the landing gear
@RB107 (RRHI - Loyalist)
-@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore (Loyalist)
@NominalSituation (Sorbet Onion - Loyalist)
@Dracul0Anderson (Skypark - Loyalist?)
-@SPSidearm (DoF Leader - Loyalist?)
-@MonsNotTheMonster (Pearlian Republic - Loyalist)
@JaxHere (MDA - Loyalist)
-@LunarEclipseSP (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@windshifter1 (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Karroc9522 (MDA - Loyalist)
-@KPLBall (MDA - Loyalist)
@TheMouse (MDA Leader - Loyalist)
-@Monarchii (The Monarchii - Loyalist)
@SamuelJamesCastor (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@CrestelAeronautics (MDA - Loyalist)
-@TheUltimatePlaneLover (- MDA - Loyalist)
-@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 (MDA - Loyalist)
@AeroTactical
@Zero0Two2
@BlackGearCompany
@RB107 Great battle, buddy. @TheUltimatePlaneLover Now I announce that NS-1 will have the capability to go to the front line for combat.
nice, our pressure is increasing
Asking to be tagged
@SPsidearm Then I need to have a good discussion with you
@TheUltimatePlaneLover @KPLBall Of course you are safe, because if I really want to fight, it's not a small number anymore
Also, remember to indicate the attack location next time because I didn't see it.
To be honest, you scared me to death. I'm already prepared to use the outpost as a second battlefield
RB107 (RRHI - Loyalist) (He has already arrived)
-@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore (Loyalist)
@NominalSituation (Sorbet Onion - Loyalist)
@NerfAddict (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Boeing727200F (MDA - Loyalist)
-@SuperSuperTheSylph (Diable Defense - Loyalist)
@windshifter1 (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Karroc9522 (MDA - Loyalist)
-@KPLBall (MDA - Loyalist)
@TheMouse (MDA Leader - Loyalist)
-@Monarchii (The Monarchii - Loyalist)
@SamuelJamesCastor (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@CrestelAeronautics (MDA - Loyalist)
-@TheUltimatePlaneLover (- MDA - Loyalist)
-@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 (MDA - Loyalist)
BFX-20A
@TheUltimatePlaneLover except for eventually support from SimpleChina™ and SimpleNorthKorea™.
Why haven't I seen such a setting before?
@SPsidearm Nothing, just surprised by the name. What does it come from?
pinzhao…?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover hum?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Thanks!
@MosquitowithaMachineGun Thanks!
@TheUltimatePlaneLover
@KPLBall But this is not a plane
My picture has been loaded, you... Forget it, I don't want to say anything more, let TUPL and the shell explain it.
@KPLBall Also, next I will test your MDA's air defense capabilities.@TheUltimatePlaneLover
Is this the soldier you brought out?
@KPLBall Make me laugh so hard. I haven't loaded the picture yet, so I can't see it. Let me ask you - ZG-6A will immediately self destruct when manipulated by AI, so which SAM are you destroying?
Where is my air defense?
Resolution in progress: We need to ensure the safety of our outposts in the sea area more than our allies.
Effect: Deploying NS-1 on the Isle of Wight
@SPsidearm Well... Not really. What I'm saying is that I understand you're tagging someone who made an appointment in advance.
As for M4 and AK... I think we need to consider them based on the current situation, such as the snowy environment in Snowtown
@SPsidearm fine. I know now
… Why only tagged them two
@Zero0Two2
Usually, we reserve space during production, so it is difficult to directly modify the finished product. But you can try model clipping
@BlackGearCompany hum? can you let me see?
@KPLBall Yeah!
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 Too small, the details cannot be printed well
@Graingy surely
@Graingy ? 就悬浮器啊… wait… Hovering Device?
@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 @TheUltimatePlaneLover The liftscale value of the wing is 2.5 (Normally, it should be taken as 1. Increasing the value can help improve maneuverability), which causes abnormal shaking of the wing after the aircraft enters the water. This bug was caused by some unknown reason. This is my inference conclusion
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Normal speed and fast speed do have this bug, but slow speed does not.
This matter is unremarkable - Sociology+3.
@Subsere fine
@Subsere What effect do you ultimately want
@Subsere … interchanging… Wait for me for a moment
@Subsere … Have you tested it separately? Your problem is not because two equations are strung together, but because the output value is problematic, even if there is only one of them, it is still the same.
It's quite troublesome for you to change this problem, but now you have two variables in your hand: LandingGear and GearDown, which correspond to four different situations. Then you can change the judgment from the GearDown variable to two variables, corresponding to the situations you want.
The problem is obvious, it's that your numerical value is incorrect. LandingGear only has 0 and 1 two numbers. I suggest you add a judgment on the LandingGear value to determine whether to release or retract the landing gear
So whats wrong
before tagged
@SPsidearm …