@RestlessGalaxies …? abs(VerticalG)>10?Pitch-PitchRate*0.015: (Throttle>0.91?0:Pitch)
so I cant use vector engine? Well, actually there's no problem writing it on the wing surface
To be honest, I'm curious. Haven't you ever seen a vector engine?
@RestlessGalaxies I noticed that there is a clause in the entry that restricts the G-force. If I cannot meet the requirements, will my eligibility for the competition be cancelled or will all points be deducted for this project
Hmm... Although our main fleet cannot be produced yet due to unlocked technologies like mobile auto-aiming artillery and ballistic anti-ship missiles,our advanced technology has already completed all theoretical R&D for attack submarines. Perhaps we might be able to roll them off the production line within three days.
Regarding our response... the setting is strong and invincible, and the actual performance may only be a lower level substitute for Shock, identified as not requiring targeting. It's the reaction you want from me, this is real
@TheUltimatePlaneLover The problem is that missile research is not going smoothly. FT missiles have their own limitations, such as not being able to attack enemies with negative proximity rates.
But that's for air-to-air missile.
When you start working with FT, especially practical FT tools, you'll learn to maintain a calm mindset in the face of life's challenges-because fixing bugs is so damn hard!
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But the reality is that once a systematic military force is established, it can only be countered by another systematic force. You suggested I target the weak points of three tanks individually,yet what I see is the challenge of simultaneously engaging all three tanks in combat.
My response is that tanks are far more expensive than missiles. I am the "Joint Firepower Strike Doctrine." While the rules explicitly prohibit the deployment of overpowered weapons, the coordinated integration of multiple systematic weapon systems allows for a seamless circumvention of these restrictions.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I've got a grasp of the features of your three tanks, but your perspective has me deeply intrigued. Putting aside your opening two statements for a moment-specifically, 'Your opponent's blindside is the past: ancient tactics prevail.'-are you trying to get me to throw myself into a suicidal armor-penetration arms race with you
here?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Your combat performance here is really confusing. Even electromagnetic cannons specialized in armor-piercing attacks can't penetrate your armor. So let me ask you—what exactly can destroy it?
You said, "Oh, this tank was designed to sacrifice speed for heavy armor." Fine, if regular tank shells can't pierce it, I can accept that as part of its unique characteristics.
But now you're telling me, "Oh, electromagnetic cannons can't penetrate it either"? The whole point of electromagnetic cannon tanks is to sacrifice other capabilities for extreme penetration power. Yet you're claiming even those are useless against it. Then let me ask you—does it make sense that "tanks capable of resisting electromagnetic cannons get destroyed by air-to-surface missiles" or "nuke-resistant tanks are eliminated by guided bombs"? If you insist nothing can destroy this tank, what am I supposed to use? Cruise missiles? Ballistic missiles?
And don't get me started on SPsidearm's M5A1 that can withstand ten electromagnetic cannon hits. If I recall correctly, that's their main battle tank. How exactly are we supposed to destroy that? "Oh, it's made from super materials excavated from the desert"—isn't that just lazy hand-waving lore? Why not claim they collaborated with Martians while you're at it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I want to know, how exactly am l supposed to destroy a tank that can withstand ten hits from an electromagnetic cannon? With your sudden material science breakthrough, how is anyone else supposed to compete? @SPsidearm
nice tank
@TheUltimatePlaneLover @SPsidearm Speaking of which, even railgun can't penetrate your tanks. What kind of material are your tanks actually made of?
By the way, can I improve it?
@JaxHere (MDA - Loyalist)
-@LunarEclipseSP (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@UnitedinOne90 (Loyalist)
@windshifter1 (MDA - Loyalist)
-@Karroc9522 (MDA - Loyalist)
@DeeganWithABazooka (Deegan - Loyalist)
@TheMouse (MDA Leader - Loyalist)
-@Monarchii (The Monarchii - Loyalist)
@SamuelJamesCastor (Snowstone - Loyalist)
@CrestelAeronautics (MDA - Loyalist)
-@TheUltimatePlaneLover (- MDA - Loyalist)
-@MIGFOXHOUND31BSM26 (MDA - Loyalist)
@Zero0Two2
@BlackGearCompany
@Graingy … Let's forget about it. With this time, my stealth carrier based aircraft have been mass-produced
@Graingy 12 F-225, $240 million USD, no time limit
@Graingy Okay, then I won't force you. Cancel time limit, no rush
@Graingy How much are you raising the price? If it's too much, I'll just use my own
@Graingy 12 F-225, $240 million USD
@Graingy I need 12 planes, the faster the better. Can you give me a price.
@Graingy Do you have a shipboard aircraft? Delivery within two days, you can set the price
@RestlessGalaxies …?
I don't think most people would think of the one you mentioned…
@RestlessGalaxies I don't quite understand why vector engines should be banned for non realistic reasons, as they are clearly widely used in reality.
+1@RestlessGalaxies …?
+2abs(VerticalG)>10?Pitch-PitchRate*0.015: (Throttle>0.91?0:Pitch)
so I cant use vector engine? Well, actually there's no problem writing it on the wing surface
To be honest, I'm curious. Haven't you ever seen a vector engine?
@RestlessGalaxies Um... It makes sense, anyway, limiting G-force only requires adding a correction code to the vector engine
@RestlessGalaxies I noticed that there is a clause in the entry that restricts the G-force. If I cannot meet the requirements, will my eligibility for the competition be cancelled or will all points be deducted for this project
must VTOL?
@Lake so bad
Hmm... Although our main fleet cannot be produced yet due to unlocked technologies like mobile auto-aiming artillery and ballistic anti-ship missiles,our advanced technology has already completed all theoretical R&D for attack submarines. Perhaps we might be able to roll them off the production line within three days.
+1@Someonefun yeah I saw it.
To be honest, I am honored to receive such an evaluation. I hope you can continue to work hard in the future
@Lake surely no
I am sorry to hear that
It's strange, I didn't even receive any notification, why?
+1By the way, nice one bro
Regarding our response... the setting is strong and invincible, and the actual performance may only be a lower level substitute for Shock, identified as not requiring targeting. It's the reaction you want from me, this is real
+1@SomeSPGuyWhoLikesLore You cut off the function of the most essence... I think it is not as good as track
+1It took us a long time to confirm that it really doesn't have any shock absorbers
Confusing design
+1@Subsere Can you let me see it?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover The problem is that missile research is not going smoothly. FT missiles have their own limitations, such as not being able to attack enemies with negative proximity rates.
+1But that's for air-to-air missile.
When you start working with FT, especially practical FT tools, you'll learn to maintain a calm mindset in the face of life's challenges-because fixing bugs is so damn hard!
@TheUltimatePlaneLover surely…
@SPsidearm surely
@TheUltimatePlaneLover But the reality is that once a systematic military force is established, it can only be countered by another systematic force. You suggested I target the weak points of three tanks individually,yet what I see is the challenge of simultaneously engaging all three tanks in combat.
My response is that tanks are far more expensive than missiles. I am the "Joint Firepower Strike Doctrine." While the rules explicitly prohibit the deployment of overpowered weapons, the coordinated integration of multiple systematic weapon systems allows for a seamless circumvention of these restrictions.
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I've got a grasp of the features of your three tanks, but your perspective has me deeply intrigued. Putting aside your opening two statements for a moment-specifically, 'Your opponent's blindside is the past: ancient tactics prevail.'-are you trying to get me to throw myself into a suicidal armor-penetration arms race with you
here?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover ? wdym
@Subsere Then you just need to write 'Eject' on the detachers
@Subsere "Eject=1"
Which variable did you set for 'Eject'?
?
@TheUltimatePlaneLover Your combat performance here is really confusing. Even electromagnetic cannons specialized in armor-piercing attacks can't penetrate your armor. So let me ask you—what exactly can destroy it?
You said, "Oh, this tank was designed to sacrifice speed for heavy armor." Fine, if regular tank shells can't pierce it, I can accept that as part of its unique characteristics.
But now you're telling me, "Oh, electromagnetic cannons can't penetrate it either"? The whole point of electromagnetic cannon tanks is to sacrifice other capabilities for extreme penetration power. Yet you're claiming even those are useless against it. Then let me ask you—does it make sense that "tanks capable of resisting electromagnetic cannons get destroyed by air-to-surface missiles" or "nuke-resistant tanks are eliminated by guided bombs"? If you insist nothing can destroy this tank, what am I supposed to use? Cruise missiles? Ballistic missiles?
And don't get me started on SPsidearm's M5A1 that can withstand ten electromagnetic cannon hits. If I recall correctly, that's their main battle tank. How exactly are we supposed to destroy that? "Oh, it's made from super materials excavated from the desert"—isn't that just lazy hand-waving lore? Why not claim they collaborated with Martians while you're at it?
Congrats on silver!
@SPsidearm I see
@TheUltimatePlaneLover I want to know, how exactly am l supposed to destroy a tank that can withstand ten hits from an electromagnetic cannon? With your sudden material science breakthrough, how is anyone else supposed to compete? @SPsidearm
@SPsidearm I am sorry, how can I use the railgun?
0.001,0.001,0.001…
@SPsidearm thanks
nice tank
@TheUltimatePlaneLover @SPsidearm Speaking of which, even railgun can't penetrate your tanks. What kind of material are your tanks actually made of?
By the way, can I improve it?
@Aano78 Problem solved - adding weight to the rotating shaft
… bye, my old friend…
@Aano78 fine, thanks
@JBPAviation I will try it, thanks
@Aano78 Thank you very much, friend, but I don't think I can change the length
What the hell… It just look…
+2