106k Hedero Comments

  • Mclaren Jawcracker Supersport 5.1 years ago

    Aww thanks man! The only thing that really bothers me when it comes to simpleplanes when you try to make a vehicle is keeping good performance. It is very difficult to make good cars.@KnightOfRen

  • Bugatti Model 100p Racer 5.1 years ago

    Actually idk. Most likely a pretty simple race considering it was the late 30s.@KnightOfRen

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Lol seriously? It might be the fact that it's turning.@L3dg3ndary

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    I don't think the ar 234 even has a bomb bay. Pretty pitiful for a bomber if you ask me lol. Just look up ar 234 on google. It's really pretty!@Cobrahuey

  • Bugatti Model 100p Racer 5.1 years ago

    Actually it wasn't all that fast. At least not for a racer. Only achieving a top speed of 124 mph. Funny how an aircraft designed for top speed back in the late 30s has the same speed as a normal trainer made in the late 60s.@KnightOfRen

  • Mclaren Jawcracker Supersport 5.1 years ago

    Thanks dude! This was one of my first cars I ever put effort into.@KnightOfRen

  • Lockheed F-104 Starfighter 5.1 years ago

    Thank you!@KnightOfRen

  • Porsche 200 5.1 years ago

    Yeah the performance and speed was meant to be unrealistic but sorta arcade style.@KnightOfRen

  • Mikoyan Gurivech Mig-32 Freetail 5.1 years ago

    Thanks dude!@KnightOfRen

  • Lockheed P-38 Lightning Hornet 5.1 years ago

    Thanks!@KnightOfRen

  • A-113 Stealth attack 5.1 years ago

    Nice use of the angled piece as the body.@Louis2005

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    If you want. It looks like it will be pretty challenging.@Cobrahuey

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    I'm gonna see if I can make an arado 234. @Cobrahuey

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    Ah I see. We could also allow fictional builds too I guess.@Cobrahuey

  • Fokker Dr. I 5.1 years ago

    Holy crap he did. For what reason?@QingyuZhou

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Bro I know, I actually suck at part efficiency. BogdanX and so many other pros do it. I guess it comes with experience :/@ChisP

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Hmm, I would choose a name that doesn't use numbers on the back, and uses proper capitalization. To me it just looks good. But hey do whatever you want.@Cobrahuey

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    Hmm, so for example if we want to make a p-51, we both make a p-51, wait to upload on the same day, and then call it on our titles p-51 CobraDero?@Cobrahuey

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Yeah camo was a pretty classic color for these birds but I can't imagine doing camo. Besides, before I even finished adding the details, the part count was bumping 600. @ChisP

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Nah I normally with just have an airplane that will flop from time to time. It's pretty normal.@Cobrahuey

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    So like a fictional or replica?@Cobrahuey

  • Fokker Dr. I 5.1 years ago

    Nice fokker. My canberra is trying to keep up with your fokker in upvotes lol.@asteroidbook345

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    I haven't uploaded an aircraft over there either lol. I assume we would just upload a fictional airplane with our group name as the company idk.@Cobrahuey

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Thanks man I appreciate it!@Cobrahuey

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    I think it could be. I guess I haven't uploaded a single airplane for cobradero have I lol.@Cobrahuey

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Lol@WrongFlyer

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Wow that's awesome!@Cobrahuey

  • Pitts Samson updated by Hedero 5.1 years ago

    Ah I see.@Cobrahuey

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Interesting. I just tried it. I knew people did it but never realized how. Thanks for the info!@WrongFlyer

  • Martin B-57 Canberra 5.1 years ago

    Thanks!@KnightOfRen

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    Yeah I think we do.@KnightOfRen

  • Grumman TBF Avenger (CH) 5.1 years ago

    Thanks!@KnightOfRen

  • Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate 5.2 years ago

    Aww thanks dude!@MarcinekSt

  • Pitts Samson updated by Hedero 5.2 years ago

    Oh wow that's awesome! How do you guys know each other?@Cobrahuey

  • Pitts Samson updated by Hedero 5.2 years ago

    Yeah sure. So ya'll know each other in real life then?@Cobrahuey

  • Pitts Samson updated by Hedero 5.2 years ago

    Thanks dude!@KnightOfRen

  • Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate 5.2 years ago

    XD Yeah this thing did better than I expected.@Zoowarp

  • AV-8C Harrier Gunship 5.2 years ago

    Yeah, thanks for fixing it! I crashed it multiple times trying to go from vertical flight to horizontal flight because I hadn't read the instructions properly lol.@ChisP

  • AV-8C Harrier Gunship 5.2 years ago

    I was going to say isn't this diloph's harrier? Lol.@ChisP

  • [Teaser] The Voodoo... 5.2 years ago

    Yeah mine too@BagelPlane

  • Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate 5.2 years ago

    Thanks@Bigboi2077

  • CHT-1-MK1 Liberator 5.2 years ago

    Oh sweet!@Cobrahuey

  • CHT-1-MK1 Liberator 5.2 years ago

    Oh wow ot looks great! It might not quite be bulky enough but it still looks good. Also good desc. detail.@Cobrahuey

  • Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate 5.2 years ago

    Sorry I don't know anything about maneuvers.@An2k

  • Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate 5.2 years ago

    Thanks!@Tang0five

  • Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate 5.2 years ago

    Yes lol. My favorite household item@Cobrahuey

  • Me 5.2 years ago

    Wooooo. Ohio. Where my grandparents live. LEEETSSSS GOOOOOO!!!!

  • Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate 5.2 years ago

    Thanks man! I really love all the support and positive advice you gave me! @ChiChiWerx

  • Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate 5.2 years ago

    Thanks so much dude! I'm glad you like it. And of course, use it for whatever you want! @CRJ900Pilot

  • Nakajima Ki-84 Hayate 5.2 years ago

    Ok, I will definitely check it out!@BogdanX