Yes it is an unrealistic aileron size. I knew this from the beginning. However, this is a fictional build, meaning that some features are exaggerated for entertainment purposes only. This build isn't meant to be 100% realistic.@BogdanX
Lol actually what I meant was was that I used a blueprint but the blueprint didn't display the correct p-47. The one with the petruding fin lol. I always use blueprints if I can. I just sorta eyeballed the fin from other photos. So for the confusion lol.@EpicPigster1
Wow! Thank you so much for the support and positive feedback! I really appreciate it. However, I think I might know what's making the tail look a little short, the fin pretruding from the rudder out on the fuselage was sorta eyeballed. I didn't follow a blueprint for it. I don't know whether it's maybe making it look shorter than it is or not. But anyways thank you so much!@EpicPigster1
Dude, this deserves at least 5x the amount of upvotes that it got. With internal and exterior detail to the level that you have on this aircraft, it should be on the highest rated page. And 3 months of work, I couldn't imagine working that hard. I don't know if this would've changed anything but maybe a thumbnail of the front of the plane would allow a viewer to see the main part of the aircraft. It's a great photo don't get me wrong, but I think it would maybe grab the public's eye a little better. But anyways, great build bro!@TheXDimension32
Yep. Your aircraft is also very accurate in shape to the real thing. It maybe lacks a little detail though. But it looks great as a simple build!@AnoniMosu
Actually many people do. BogdanX, JamesPlanesii, Rambojutter, the list goes on. If this person wishes to make aircraft that fly realistically then so be it. @BlitzBombers
Ok, so it might be a little sluggish. Real aircraft don't fly like magical fairies though. They don't generally zip around the sky like a monster. I would say this is probably closer to the realistic side of flight performance.@BlitzBombers
XD @ThePilotDude
Wow, very interesting info. That really is quite fascinating! What a large turbocharger too. @F104Deathtrap
+1Alright, so the p-47 without a turbocharger is so hideous, I believe even you would prefer the chonk version lol.@ACEPILOT109
Thanks man! Glad you like it!@Mumpsy
I know right? What a fantastic aircraft put to waste :(@Alta2809
+1Yeah I can see that actually.@Cobrahuey
Awesome!@PieroKH2B
Lol I actually did think about it. I might do that here pretty soon idk. I think it would awesome as I've never seen it done before.@switdog08
I'll take that as a nes@ACEPILOT109
Thank you man! I got the idea from BogdanX's cursed corsair.@Alta2809
+1Oh thank you so much dude! I'm glad you like it!@Mustang51
Lol. What if I removed the turbocharger????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????@ACEPILOT109
Oh my bad. Thank you for the observations :)@BogdanX
Because you like it so much LOL@ACEPILOT109
Lol IT'S NOT UUUGGLLLLYYYYYY!!!
but thanks hehe@ACEPILOT109
Yes it is an unrealistic aileron size. I knew this from the beginning. However, this is a fictional build, meaning that some features are exaggerated for entertainment purposes only. This build isn't meant to be 100% realistic.@BogdanX
Yeah I thought too that the roll was pretty fast. But then I realized the aileron size in comparison to the aircraft's wing.@BogdanX
*Airacobra@Diloph
Oh yeah. It looks really nice!@PieroKH2B
Oh, never watched it but I'm glad that my airplane can be considered a lord airplane lol.@asteroidbook345
You aren't a dummy lol. It was hardly even a mistake. Also, why is it the lord of the planes?@asteroidbook345
Lol I used the fictional tag.@asteroidbook345
@ACEPILOT109
Lol I'd love to see a redo for sure!@Mustang51
+1Lol yeah it just looked a lot like one. It looks really nice though! @Mustang51
Isn't this a p-59?
Uhh maybe later. I'm already working on a new aircraft.@PieroKH2B
Lol actually what I meant was was that I used a blueprint but the blueprint didn't display the correct p-47. The one with the petruding fin lol. I always use blueprints if I can. I just sorta eyeballed the fin from other photos. So for the confusion lol.@EpicPigster1
+1Oh sweet. What type?@BLITZWING
Yep!@KrAkenAtomic
+1Reminds me of a j-21.
Wow, clearly a lot of work went into this. Great job!@Suubk27
+1Yeah.@TheXDimension32
Oh wow. A true veteran I see.@DeathStalker627
Are you playing WT?@DeathStalker627
Oh ok lol.@EternalDarkness
Wow! Thank you so much for the support and positive feedback! I really appreciate it. However, I think I might know what's making the tail look a little short, the fin pretruding from the rudder out on the fuselage was sorta eyeballed. I didn't follow a blueprint for it. I don't know whether it's maybe making it look shorter than it is or not. But anyways thank you so much!@EpicPigster1
Yeah I totally see what you mean dude. It was probably just a matter of luck honestly.@TheXDimension32
Lol I love the news report. Also, I love the enthusiasm in the narrators voice lol. Great job!@Renovator
Yeah@SouthTunnel2
Dude, this deserves at least 5x the amount of upvotes that it got. With internal and exterior detail to the level that you have on this aircraft, it should be on the highest rated page. And 3 months of work, I couldn't imagine working that hard. I don't know if this would've changed anything but maybe a thumbnail of the front of the plane would allow a viewer to see the main part of the aircraft. It's a great photo don't get me wrong, but I think it would maybe grab the public's eye a little better. But anyways, great build bro!@TheXDimension32
+2Aww thank you! And thank you for being a fan!@PieroKH2B
Cool.
Oh I'm sorry. I didn't realize that it was. Trust me, I wouldn't have posted it if I knew it was considered spam.@EternalDarkness
Yeah I see your reason for doing this. A very good one at that. So just keep up what your doing and you'll hit platinum in no time!@AnoniMosu
Yep. Your aircraft is also very accurate in shape to the real thing. It maybe lacks a little detail though. But it looks great as a simple build!@AnoniMosu
+1Thank you@Trainzo
Dude exactly, I so agree with you.@Mustang51
+1Actually many people do. BogdanX, JamesPlanesii, Rambojutter, the list goes on. If this person wishes to make aircraft that fly realistically then so be it. @BlitzBombers
+1Ok, so it might be a little sluggish. Real aircraft don't fly like magical fairies though. They don't generally zip around the sky like a monster. I would say this is probably closer to the realistic side of flight performance.@BlitzBombers
+2