@Ventus @JoshuaW dont give josh a hard time vents ;), i think the current unity engine and sp are only as good as android 4, is extremely buggy and its not his fault nor responsibility to engineer around to make things work along a faulty environment
@GuyFolk @JoshuaW of cos tvc can do better than control surfaces, i had experirment with tvc to the extend that even my bricks can fly pretty well. so i came to accept the challenge of making non tvc planes for 2 reasons.
1) i should make planes that can actually perform decently without tvc, since i had made ones that i cant consider as planes
2) making non tvc planes to fly like one is hard or near impossible and therefore itself is the definition of a challenge lol
@GuyFolk "good at locking the nose where u left it?" u are the guy who made planes that taught me exactly how to do this 3 weeks after i joined. lol. now i am totally happy with the 8 months after that.
@Ownedpilot a programmed learning capability on funky trees?
i think it can read input and outputs but learning to do what next? i am interested.
btw i can also read chinese
@JoshuaW "Might be the most complex (and the best) fly-by-wire programm in this game so far (glad to be proved wrong)."
@GuyFolk i have to agree with guyfolk this is a top tier, but i think it's not the most complex.
it is definitely not the most complex:
until you try to achieve what u can do with a tvc... *without a tvc",
and then without a tail ;))
i have been spending weeks and months on a wip that does that.
it's not completed yet but it's about 95% complete i would say
i havent upload the wip yet, it also carries a variation of the excellent auto camo u made. i love it
but then i took it to next level ;)
actually my automatic camouflage build is near completion.
it also comes with an automatic missile avoidance technology
and probably the best looking afterburner on sp
@TheSarge same, i also have a plane that is in the last stage just like yours. i just can't say how much fun i am having while doing this. joy to you too :)
@Khanhlam not bad for a start, this is actually good considering it doesnt drop like a brick without tvc.
had u had a forward CoL than this build tho, u would probably have a nightmare fixing it.
btw your flaps are moving in a different direction when having pitch input, this is a must to fix them to consider a build complete. i see that u also have minimal fbw tethering with the inputs, all the fbw could fix a lot more stability issues. it's now a good time to start playing with numbers on angleofattack mitigation. glad to help you but i am quite busy irl and some of my wip, so i will help u when i can, also i'd probably leave pitching and vtol controls away from the wingtip controls aka ailerons if i were u, and this plane has lots of parts for this type of build :)
@Ian_Yashima heh, if u need some fixing to the fbw u should ask me for a try, i dunno why i sucked at coding but somehow fbw's style of playing with numbers just seems to be easy to me. but u know wht, i was specific about the curves, that part on top of the front fuse, right after the cockpit are especially difficult for me to make, i have seen tons of f35 on this site and most of them are just easy mockups, over simplified versions, thanks for explaining everything to me. btw i said the model was fine, never approved on that f35 flight performance :P btw u wanna have some fun testing my newer plane here, just for fun? it's still a wip but f u want to i will post it later. i rarely ask people to test planes for me, i usually do that by myself, consider that a privilege lol. sounds cool to have at least some player's input
@PaperPlaneHasDream just dissing rage against player, so far not much politics involved. i am lucky my chinese typing interface doesnt like to show up on sp. but then, i wish people here would just shut up and make airplanes. this author might have made a plane with bad flight characteristics. but i like the curves on this thing. we all paid for this game i dont think anyone should get called on not meeting anyone else's expectation, this is just dumb.
@MrSilverWolf yea i would've reported this guy but obviously hes just using some new acct to do the profanity. sorry but thanks i am more than happy to cut this.
i added a fbw system to it, and fixed some minor problems. i left a large portion of the plane for you to experiment with so i dont take away all the fun of fixing it oh, don't bother with using the flaps. i dont think the plnae need extra lift. unless u gonna ask me again i will fix it with other ways. adding flaps do mess with the handling abit
@Ventus @JoshuaW dont give josh a hard time vents ;), i think the current unity engine and sp are only as good as android 4, is extremely buggy and its not his fault nor responsibility to engineer around to make things work along a faulty environment
+1this livery reminds me of my earlier beloved plane
+1i told people even a brick with tvc can fly pretty well
+1this is why i switch back to making non tvc planes
at least they are planes
@JoshuaW well done!
ps: i feel perplexed when i see pi in the code. hehe
+1@GuyFolk @JoshuaW of cos tvc can do better than control surfaces, i had experirment with tvc to the extend that even my bricks can fly pretty well. so i came to accept the challenge of making non tvc planes for 2 reasons.
+11) i should make planes that can actually perform decently without tvc, since i had made ones that i cant consider as planes
2) making non tvc planes to fly like one is hard or near impossible and therefore itself is the definition of a challenge lol
@GuyFolk "good at locking the nose where u left it?" u are the guy who made planes that taught me exactly how to do this 3 weeks after i joined. lol. now i am totally happy with the 8 months after that.
+1@Ownedpilot a programmed learning capability on funky trees?
+1i think it can read input and outputs but learning to do what next? i am interested.
btw i can also read chinese
@JoshuaW "Might be the most complex (and the best) fly-by-wire programm in this game so far (glad to be proved wrong)."
@GuyFolk i have to agree with guyfolk this is a top tier, but i think it's not the most complex.
+1it is definitely not the most complex:
until you try to achieve what u can do with a tvc... *without a tvc",
and then without a tail ;))
i have been spending weeks and months on a wip that does that.
it's not completed yet but it's about 95% complete i would say
i havent upload the wip yet, it also carries a variation of the excellent auto camo u made. i love it
but then i took it to next level ;)
love this
+1this is awesome.
+1a cockpit is never complete without a face.
now this one gets my approval
+1actually my automatic camouflage build is near completion.
+1it also comes with an automatic missile avoidance technology
and probably the best looking afterburner on sp
unfortunately, dragonair is now defunct.
might as well make this one a memorial build.. lol
+1your first jet is INCREDIBLE...!!!
+1keep it up u can beat almost everyone on SP building jets
@TheSarge same, i also have a plane that is in the last stage just like yours. i just can't say how much fun i am having while doing this. joy to you too :)
+1biggest full surface rudder on sp
+1T
+1@ReignSUPREME 我也是在弄一个中国的科幻机,快完成了也想弄个好看点的大头照怎么联系darkblue,你会不会也想测试一下我的飞机
+1we definitely need to add a sizable beacon halo as a xml variable.
beacon >> haloscale
+1the only thing missing:
chicago bulls without illinois
+1now this is just inzaine. :)
+1this is something i hope can happen in funky labels.
+1just in my dreams :)
@JTsong how do u even edit sound
+1@Khanhlam not bad for a start, this is actually good considering it doesnt drop like a brick without tvc.
+1had u had a forward CoL than this build tho, u would probably have a nightmare fixing it.
btw your flaps are moving in a different direction when having pitch input, this is a must to fix them to consider a build complete. i see that u also have minimal fbw tethering with the inputs, all the fbw could fix a lot more stability issues. it's now a good time to start playing with numbers on angleofattack mitigation. glad to help you but i am quite busy irl and some of my wip, so i will help u when i can, also i'd probably leave pitching and vtol controls away from the wingtip controls aka ailerons if i were u, and this plane has lots of parts for this type of build :)
i must be lucky considering i am the 10th upvote
+1well i wished all helicopters are easy to fly like this one.
+1i like this build
+1almost perfect
next: we need a hopping vampire
+1GROUDON USED FOX THREE!
+1IT'S SUPER EFFECTIVE!
@MrCOPTY will do
+1@OrderlyHippo @Zander305
+1thanks!
dont forget to add variables
+1u mustve seen my comment some where on that funky section :)
+1@Ian_Yashima heh, if u need some fixing to the fbw u should ask me for a try, i dunno why i sucked at coding but somehow fbw's style of playing with numbers just seems to be easy to me. but u know wht, i was specific about the curves, that part on top of the front fuse, right after the cockpit are especially difficult for me to make, i have seen tons of f35 on this site and most of them are just easy mockups, over simplified versions, thanks for explaining everything to me. btw i said the model was fine, never approved on that f35 flight performance :P btw u wanna have some fun testing my newer plane here, just for fun? it's still a wip but f u want to i will post it later. i rarely ask people to test planes for me, i usually do that by myself, consider that a privilege lol. sounds cool to have at least some player's input
+1@PaperPlaneHasDream just dissing rage against player, so far not much politics involved. i am lucky my chinese typing interface doesnt like to show up on sp. but then, i wish people here would just shut up and make airplanes. this author might have made a plane with bad flight characteristics. but i like the curves on this thing. we all paid for this game i dont think anyone should get called on not meeting anyone else's expectation, this is just dumb.
+1@MrSilverWolf yea i would've reported this guy but obviously hes just using some new acct to do the profanity. sorry but thanks i am more than happy to cut this.
+1@Raiquaza19AirComp u made it! too bad this color works for vtol nozzles only i wish my planes could look like this without using nozzles
+1@Raiquaza19AirComp gotta love that afterburner color
+1already on my favorite list.
+1about less than 1% of the planes can do this
@DashEight your bhd-400 series are actually pretty veteran
+1@TRD6932 seriously u need more than just an airfoil, but precisely a fbw to deal with the forward swept wing
+1i added a fbw system to it, and fixed some minor problems. i left a large portion of the plane for you to experiment with so i dont take away all the fun of fixing it oh, don't bother with using the flaps. i dont think the plnae need extra lift. unless u gonna ask me again i will fix it with other ways. adding flaps do mess with the handling abit
+1sounds interesting. i think i will be in but i dunno what i am going to do lol
+1@tarikGR thanks, it should for a gen 7+
+1beautiful
+1i love how clean this plane is.
i can even get that new car smell by just seeing it on the screen
+1@ZeroWithSlashedO so u are asking for it, i will put my plane here but i am asking for not putting me anywhere on the podium just to be fair.
+1most brutal op plane in war thunder
+1most brutal op plane in war thunder
+1smoooooooth
+1