Interesting, but if you can make it a little smaller, mainly in the length, then that would be great. I just forgot to add a size restriction to the rules
@TakicraftCorporation
Well, as long as it's small enough (look at something like a PA-28 or Cessna 172 for size comparison) and, you know, actually works, then I will allow it
@TrislandianAlliance
I would probably say no, as the Beechcraft Super King Air (King Air 350) is probably the largest aircraft you can find in the General Aviation catagory
sorry, this was supposed to be unlisted
@Mustang51
Ok, thanks for entering
@jamesPLANESii
AMAZING. For me, this legit looks real. That's how good it is
@Potato21
I will tell you how to do it. If I can remember...
@Potato21
yeah
@Ian1231100
well, you haven't uploaded anything yet, soo....
@Tpierce
Your welcome
@ndfr623
Well, I will just make a jet powered twin-fuselage aircraft then
@Tpierce
you have already done it, you just @name in a comment on a post
@mikoyanster
Are propellers allowed?
I'm going to build a twin fuselage aircraft
@Potato21
Very neat.
Just a note, but if the guardian missiles are supposed to be the proton torpedoes, you know you can rename them, right?
ok, thanks for entering :3
@mikoyanster
Thanks
@mikoyanster
Deadline 28 February 2020
@mikoyanster
Could you tell me how you did the text for the deadline?
Very neat. Thanks for entering
Ok, thanks for entering
@LockheedLover
LoL
@Chancey21
I'm just saying that I don't want the deadline to be too far away
@Bradford
Neat :3
@Chancey21
Is Febuary 29th ok?
and also including from the 1960's
@Chancey21
ok, will do
yeah, I know that, I've been doing that for ages
@WIZARD2017
@Numbers
I know, I have said before that the king air is about the largest aircraft you can have in general aviation
@GeneralOliverVonBismarck
Ok, but seriously, I'm not thinking of it being something that can exceed mach 1.
@FranzPeterSiegfried
Dude, I said February 8th, if you want an extension, then just say so
@TrislandianAlliance
@MrSilverWolf
@Zippy6
@Zippy6
did so
JUST IN CASE: There is a size restriction.
-
The length of your entry must not exeed 45 Feet.
-
The wingspan must also not exeed 58 Feet.
This is so your entry stays realistic for the GA category in terms of size. Also, I'm actually being quite generous in terms of the size restrictions
Interesting, but if you can make it a little smaller, mainly in the length, then that would be great. I just forgot to add a size restriction to the rules
@DerekSP
Ok, I will change that
Nice, but I think the wingspan is too big. I can just count the length, but the wingspan is too big. I will allow at max, a wingspan of 58 ft
@Bradford
Neato, good luck
@asteroidbook345
LOL
(your last one was good)
@TakicraftCorporation
Well, as long as it's small enough (look at something like a PA-28 or Cessna 172 for size comparison) and, you know, actually works, then I will allow it
@Numbers
Ok, rodger that, just try your best and find a way of getting it to me :3
@F4f879
@BnanaX
Well, the length of it is just over 49 ft. I know that that is to long for general aviation
@TrislandianAlliance
ok, but why is the deadline time outrageous?
@BnanaX
no, it's too long for one thing
@Sm10684
@Sm10684
I will tab you in it
@TrislandianAlliance
I would probably say no, as the Beechcraft Super King Air (King Air 350) is probably the largest aircraft you can find in the General Aviation catagory
@TrislandianAlliance
@Numbers
@Noname918181
your welcome :3
@BuiltBionixInd10
No idea, but I will need to decide if such a thing will actually be allowed in my book