This is the trailer for my upcoming build that I now have finished, after a fair bit of procrastinating. The build itself should be up early next week.
And just for anyone wondering, yes, everything in the video magically doesn't cast shadows.
(My laptop wouldn't be able to handle the making of this video with shadows enabled, given the part count.)
@Formula350
Right, but have you actually googled images of pilots sitting in a modern ejection seat before hand?
And also, the frame of the canopy would sit higher up then the top of the walls of the cockpit frame part.
@PlanariaLab
So I know I asked about changing the HUD to use the Imperial system and I'm more or less there with the Airspeed, but do you know exactly what part of the code I should be changing to adjust the altitude value, as I can't seem to get it to change to measure feet instead.
I'll just say that with your third suggestion, where you don't see that "thing on top" of ejection seats is on early ejection seats and even early ejection seats have one, just not necessarily in the same shape. This is the headrest FYI. You see it on basically every ejection seat and if you can't fit it under a canopy, then you're doing something wrong essentially.
(Also, with the 'other glass parts', basically no bomber has a perfectly round nose cone.)
@LeonardorHD1
Well, you can have a build that's below the part count, but depending on how much it's below the minimum requirement, it will get either a big point reduction (that also depends on how many parts it is below the minimum, I'll decide) or a disqualification if it's well below the minimum.
@Sparky6004
Both aircraft can undertake Medical Evacuation, it's jus not their primary role or, I presume, not what they were initially designed for.
Just look at their wiki's.
@TheGreatToad
I have no bloody clue who you are....
@Inuyasha8215
Ok, fair enough.
@IceCraftGaming
Yeah, with it being over a 1000 parts (nearly 1100 I believe), it's hard to get good FPS from my laptop.
@Dastin
Thank you.
@BogdanX
Are you referring to me?
Also, not all moving tailplanes have roll as well as pitch functions.
That would be quite nice to have.
@KfcGaming
Problem with that is that the 747 isn't used for Air tanker purposes.
This is the trailer for my upcoming build that I now have finished, after a fair bit of procrastinating. The build itself should be up early next week.
And just for anyone wondering, yes, everything in the video magically doesn't cast shadows.
(My laptop wouldn't be able to handle the making of this video with shadows enabled, given the part count.)
@TheGreatToad
What...?
@Formula350
Right, but have you actually googled images of pilots sitting in a modern ejection seat before hand?
And also, the frame of the canopy would sit higher up then the top of the walls of the cockpit frame part.
@PlanariaLab
So I know I asked about changing the HUD to use the Imperial system and I'm more or less there with the Airspeed, but do you know exactly what part of the code I should be changing to adjust the altitude value, as I can't seem to get it to change to measure feet instead.
@Viper_Z3R0
Jet engines aren't rocket engines.
@goboygo1
Check amazon again?
I just looked and it's saying it's 1.11.105 (latest version)
I'll just say that with your third suggestion, where you don't see that "thing on top" of ejection seats is on early ejection seats and even early ejection seats have one, just not necessarily in the same shape. This is the headrest FYI. You see it on basically every ejection seat and if you can't fit it under a canopy, then you're doing something wrong essentially.
(Also, with the 'other glass parts', basically no bomber has a perfectly round nose cone.)
Embraer Phenom?
(Specifically the Phenom 100)
@bombardierboy
Mk.
@bombardierboy
Yes, minimum is 250 (which tells me you either didn't read the rules, missed that particular part of said rules or forgot).
Ok, I'll be very nice and accept this, but with a heavy point reduction.
@BangRou
Oh, the VR Build challenge?
@asteroidbook345
What challenge is it?
@asteroidbook345
Wait, I was being stupid and thinking you meant it in a different way.
@asteroidbook345
What do you even want that kind of curving on text for anyways?
@Simpleplaneplayer
Yes, and it's going to be disqualified for being too low in parts.
@CoolPeach
May I know how you made those aerial panning shots at the start?
@ReinMcDeer
If I choose to, do you mind if I use this in a video I'm planning to make?
@LeonardorHD1
That's not the point...
What you submit for the challenge should be the finished product.
Sorry, but I'm going to be disqualifying this entry as it's too far far below the minimum part count.
@SussyBreadBoi
I think a way you could make skis is to make cosmetic ones and then have very flat wheels under them that are the same colour.
@LeonardorHD1
Well, you can have a build that's below the part count, but depending on how much it's below the minimum requirement, it will get either a big point reduction (that also depends on how many parts it is below the minimum, I'll decide) or a disqualification if it's well below the minimum.
Nice work
I would change the colour of the panel line as black doesn't look too good for that purpose.
You can just use the Overload mod to easily edit XML properties, which is the easiest way.
Wow!
I would say Number 1.
You know a Bug Report form for the beta exists, right?
@Richflysplanes
This will be disqualified as the part count is too low.
Colour me impressed, well done 👍👏
@FlyingPatriot
That...didn't really answer my question, but I'll take it.
Is this supposed to be a hypothetical where this thing didn't get abandoned in Antarctica?
@Sparky6004
Both aircraft can undertake Medical Evacuation, it's jus not their primary role or, I presume, not what they were initially designed for.
Just look at their wiki's.
Basically never.
@R3N13L
Yes, you're 190 parts under the minimum.
@LieutenantSOT
Well, I don't care if you make a gunship version of your build, just a medevac version, so go for it (or however you want to make it).
@NonameMini
Fixed.
@ZexkyHelicopters
And watch this video by Walvis for good thumbnail making.
I'm not an expert, but MrSilverWolf's SkyWolf 485A 'Caribou' would be a place to start.
Bloody love this, looks like a photograph IRL
I don't know why, but looking at the side, the LG looks kind of ugly (I got the same problem on one of my builds, so don't worry).
I'll take a look soon for you.
@HistoryNerd007
...what....