(Just some extra info here, I'm not trying to be your boss) when airplanes take off and land, the do a wheelie. The nose lifts and they ride on the main wheels (the big ones usually under thevwings) that pulls extra air over the wings and gives them extra lift, allowing the plane to take off at a much slower speed than if it were nose-level. Heres a photo of what I mean
I say all that because most planes are designed around the center of mass. The wings go a little bit behind it and so do the main landing gear. It makes it easier to balance and a lot easier to control. Just make sure to keep the red ball 3 or 4 blocks ahead of the landing gear and the blue ball.
@The1Big1Finger1111 Just suggestions. You seem like you put in a lot of effort, judging by the wings, nose, bomb bay and part count, I'd say you spent quite a bit of time and the front half looks pretty good.
Consider looking at diagrams of real life aircraft, you can learn a lot about how they work. The tail fins and landing gear may seem like minor details compared to things like bombs and guns, but the fins let you steer and the landing gear keeps you from crashing. Most pilots would find that a lot more important than weapons.
@klm747klm747 Upvoting is more or less by chance unless you make something good enough for the front page, and it doesn't matter when you post something that good.
Small complaint, you've got the air-to-air nosed version carrying ground attack missiles. And before you say it, yes I know that's not the point here. This plane is an obsession of mine, so I compulsively had to say something.
@whereby Nope. I'm just on the forums. I mostly play Fallout these days. Besides, I prefer the 1701-A. I can let you salvage modded parts from my planes or answer questions tho.
@AdlerSteiner NP You gotta make what inspires you. There's a guy on here that spent years making similar planes one after the other, with slight improvements. People criticized the lack of variety, but in the end he was the best maker of large aircraft on the whole site, rivaled only by TSAD.
@Trainzo Agreed. Bogdanx is a great example of that. One of the best builders on here, and almost all of his creations are mobile friendly. He even gets grumpy with himself if he goes over 400 parts.
@Trainzo Nah, dude. This thing looks great and with so few parts, it'll fly great on even the crappiest phones. Mobile ppl don't get too many good replicas like this.
@tsampoy Yeah. Airbus makes some very good planes, some of which may be the best airliners in their size category. I'm no expert so I cannot say. But I can say that Boeing has made gigantic contributions to aviation that few other firms can beat. Take any Airbus design and you will see that Boeing had a comparable design in the air at least 20 years earlier. The very concept of a large, heavy plane with thin, flexible swept wings and engines suspended in pods was developed by Boeing in 1947.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer Nah. A simple graphic design is like 20 parts. Throw in another 20 for the trucks, 10 for the deck 20 for those tacky plactic pads and you've still got 30 blocks left for whatever else you want to add.
@Minecraftpoweer It is, but it's not nearly as bad as WOT, and it's also way more realistic. Just all around better IMO. I'm so tempted to get an oculus so I can play it in VR.
Good luck w the contest
Shes got my vote, the wings and tail look great!
(Just some extra info here, I'm not trying to be your boss) when airplanes take off and land, the do a wheelie. The nose lifts and they ride on the main wheels (the big ones usually under thevwings) that pulls extra air over the wings and gives them extra lift, allowing the plane to take off at a much slower speed than if it were nose-level. Heres a photo of what I mean
I say all that because most planes are designed around the center of mass. The wings go a little bit behind it and so do the main landing gear. It makes it easier to balance and a lot easier to control. Just make sure to keep the red ball 3 or 4 blocks ahead of the landing gear and the blue ball.
@The1Big1Finger1111 Just suggestions. You seem like you put in a lot of effort, judging by the wings, nose, bomb bay and part count, I'd say you spent quite a bit of time and the front half looks pretty good.
Consider looking at diagrams of real life aircraft, you can learn a lot about how they work. The tail fins and landing gear may seem like minor details compared to things like bombs and guns, but the fins let you steer and the landing gear keeps you from crashing. Most pilots would find that a lot more important than weapons.
@sandyshores Thats impressive
She's a real beauty!
Very cool looking armored car.
@Benderisgreta123 He's in for a real treat when he discovers modded engines.
You made this whole thing?
Congratulations on your first upload!
@Trainzo Bel avion Bien joué
@ChiChiWerx It didn't like to do much of anything besides crash!
@klm747klm747 Upvoting is more or less by chance unless you make something good enough for the front page, and it doesn't matter when you post something that good.
@klm747klm747 Atlantic morning is best time, weekdays.
@doge Blew all my friends minds when I told them the "fatman" from Fallout was a real thing.
This comes pretty close to meeting the legal definition of assault.
Hmmm, how about a short-range mortar that launches nuclear weapons? Stupid idea number 436. Thanks, America!
I like art, but not social media.
Small complaint, you've got the air-to-air nosed version carrying ground attack missiles. And before you say it, yes I know that's not the point here. This plane is an obsession of mine, so I compulsively had to say something.
Nice
@Maxwell1
Wise words, amigo.
Nope. Not funny.
@whereby Yeah. The model from the first 4 movies, but not the show. It was called the 1701 in the first 3.
@whereby Nope. I'm just on the forums. I mostly play Fallout these days. Besides, I prefer the 1701-A. I can let you salvage modded parts from my planes or answer questions tho.
Ok. What sort of response are you hoping to get regarding the news of this previously unknown, now cancelled project?
@whereby Yup, that worked.
@exosuit You could ask @Hellfirekoder he might know.
@AdlerSteiner NP You gotta make what inspires you. There's a guy on here that spent years making similar planes one after the other, with slight improvements. People criticized the lack of variety, but in the end he was the best maker of large aircraft on the whole site, rivaled only by TSAD.
KBYETHEN
@FuzzyAircraftProductions Yes sir!
@sexylips35 It's a clickbaity meme.
We care, we just do it very, very quietly.
Linking ppl only works in the comments section. Spread the word.
No more upvotes!
Judging by the clickbait title and the clickbait image...
@Trainzo Agreed. Bogdanx is a great example of that. One of the best builders on here, and almost all of his creations are mobile friendly. He even gets grumpy with himself if he goes over 400 parts.
PZL M-15 "Belphegor"
Time to make the worst jet ever.
@Trainzo Nah, dude. This thing looks great and with so few parts, it'll fly great on even the crappiest phones. Mobile ppl don't get too many good replicas like this.
Under 500 this time? You, sir, are getting an upvote.
Certainly an important, underappreciated plane. Glad to see such a good replica!
@tsampoy Yeah. Airbus makes some very good planes, some of which may be the best airliners in their size category. I'm no expert so I cannot say. But I can say that Boeing has made gigantic contributions to aviation that few other firms can beat. Take any Airbus design and you will see that Boeing had a comparable design in the air at least 20 years earlier. The very concept of a large, heavy plane with thin, flexible swept wings and engines suspended in pods was developed by Boeing in 1947.
Gulag, 15 years.
Certainly a highpoint in Lockheeds history and a very good replica, too.
Always a pleasure to see something new from you.
@QingyuZhou I dunno, last month there were two or three new guys that were front-page good. It was suspicious, but cool.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer Because what? Coming in here dismissing other peoples ideas for obviously bogus reasons.
@DPSAircraftManufacturer Nah. A simple graphic design is like 20 parts. Throw in another 20 for the trucks, 10 for the deck 20 for those tacky plactic pads and you've still got 30 blocks left for whatever else you want to add.
@SledDriver I'm just giving you a hard time. It looks good and it flies good.
1:1 scale 1980's skateboard
@Minecraftpoweer It is, but it's not nearly as bad as WOT, and it's also way more realistic. Just all around better IMO. I'm so tempted to get an oculus so I can play it in VR.