@asteroidbook345 Itvis a lengthy process, and not always fair either. Replica planes get the most attention, followed by replica tanks. Cars, ships and Sci-fi builds get some attention, but not as much. Fictional aircraft struggle to get any attention at all unless they're extremely well done.
Aside from cynically "gaming" that heirarchy, the best way to win attention is to become a highly skilled modeler. I really do hope this helps.
Your attempts at getting attention are already beginning to backfire. I recommend you reevaluate your situation before you are heaped with more social setbacks. I understand you need an outlet for your feeling and that you've lost some friends but you will have to be patient, perhaps you can join additional social networks that may be more suitable to your needs.
@ChiChiWerx Nah, I just thought it would be satisfying to discuss. We aren't always permitted to voice our displeasure with other peoples posts and this seemed like a productive way to blow off some steam.
Considering the quad-50's, I'd say this is closest to where the 'G' model was in the early 90's (Operation Desert Storm). It's got the turbofans of an H model, and you included ailerons as if it were a D.
If you disabled the ailerons and smoothed out the nacelles, this would match an 80's G-model perfectly.
All that aside, this thing looks very, very good. You clearly spent a lot of time getting the looks just right, especially the wing and the spoilers. Very impressive work.
@PhantomBladeCorp I'm not prepared for a literary debate regarding the methods of constructing a decent analogy. But your line of reasoning is sound, in my opinion. I think a cooldown timer of an hour or two could help.
@PhantomBladeCorp Thank you for your further participation in the ongoing discussion! While a two letter response was more than enough, your robust explanation gives all of us a better glimpse into your processes and motivations.
I must point out that it is possible to have common sense and disagree with you at the same time, however impossible that may seem to you. For instance, common sense reveals that your insultingly simplistic analogy regarding thoughtcrime has little bearing in reality (how could one quantify thought, much less prevent it from occurring?). This becomes excessively glaring when considering that people can continue to make comments, private posts and up to 3 uploads per day.
However, the gist of your argument is pristinely clear. Limiting posts to once per day would be unreasonablly draconian. And on that point you may be correct.
@Tully2001 I do not want to see less participation. It's important to make the place welcome. But I think it will encourage better posting. People will have to consider "Is this worth mentioning?" before they punch the button.
@randomusername @CSP27 Three is too many. With three, only a handful of users could completely wipe the front page clean of posts, subjecting everyone else to much less attention.
Make moving parts last. If it has a rotator, piston or detacher then add it after everything else is finished. You are wasting time if you do it sooner because you'll just end up having to do it again later.
OV-1
Reminds me of a Lavochkin La-7
@asteroidbook345 I am here to help if you want it. Also, you can and should tear apart highly rated builds to learn how they were made.
@asteroidbook345 Itvis a lengthy process, and not always fair either. Replica planes get the most attention, followed by replica tanks. Cars, ships and Sci-fi builds get some attention, but not as much. Fictional aircraft struggle to get any attention at all unless they're extremely well done.
Aside from cynically "gaming" that heirarchy, the best way to win attention is to become a highly skilled modeler. I really do hope this helps.
+3@Rodrigo110 Link me to it.
Improve.
+1Plane is fat, but strong. Like bull.
+1Pros
Good attention to detail
Impressive interior
Cons
Can't fly
3/5
Further comments: Y U NO MAEK ARPLAEN?
Your attempts at getting attention are already beginning to backfire. I recommend you reevaluate your situation before you are heaped with more social setbacks. I understand you need an outlet for your feeling and that you've lost some friends but you will have to be patient, perhaps you can join additional social networks that may be more suitable to your needs.
+7Congratulations on saving your computer and on being a PC user in the first place.
Belt fed isn't it? Should fire non stop until ammo runs out.
OFF TOPIC
+3Just slap the default gyro on it.
+4Another great list! You should add the Tupolev Blinder to one of these.
@RamboJutter I cannot comment on these allegations.
+1@ChiChiWerx Nah, I just thought it would be satisfying to discuss. We aren't always permitted to voice our displeasure with other peoples posts and this seemed like a productive way to blow off some steam.
Considering the quad-50's, I'd say this is closest to where the 'G' model was in the early 90's (Operation Desert Storm). It's got the turbofans of an H model, and you included ailerons as if it were a D.
If you disabled the ailerons and smoothed out the nacelles, this would match an 80's G-model perfectly.
All that aside, this thing looks very, very good. You clearly spent a lot of time getting the looks just right, especially the wing and the spoilers. Very impressive work.
+1@ChiChiWerx How about a cooldown of a couple hours?
@tsampoy Pssst, don't give away your next build.
No wings, landing gear too short. No visible means of propulsion. Questionable weight distribution. Good detail. 2/5
+3@PhantomBladeCorp I'm not prepared for a literary debate regarding the methods of constructing a decent analogy. But your line of reasoning is sound, in my opinion. I think a cooldown timer of an hour or two could help.
@PhantomBladeCorp Thank you for your further participation in the ongoing discussion! While a two letter response was more than enough, your robust explanation gives all of us a better glimpse into your processes and motivations.
I must point out that it is possible to have common sense and disagree with you at the same time, however impossible that may seem to you. For instance, common sense reveals that your insultingly simplistic analogy regarding thoughtcrime has little bearing in reality (how could one quantify thought, much less prevent it from occurring?). This becomes excessively glaring when considering that people can continue to make comments, private posts and up to 3 uploads per day.
However, the gist of your argument is pristinely clear. Limiting posts to once per day would be unreasonablly draconian. And on that point you may be correct.
@tsampoy Have faith, brother.
@tsampoy The Great One is always building. He shall return.
@Tully2001 I do not want to see less participation. It's important to make the place welcome. But I think it will encourage better posting. People will have to consider "Is this worth mentioning?" before they punch the button.
+1@tsampoy Lies!
@Jetpackturtle Well said!
+2@GeneralOliverVonBismarck "with testing I have found the post limit"
No surprise there. Was it necessary to post all that crap in 4 separate comments?
+4Look for other planes with colors you like, download it, check out the hex-value.
@tsampoy
HERESY!
Just because you aren't platinum doesn't mean Zhou was ever not.
@jamesPLANESii Sensible.
She's pretty
LIES! Zhou was always platinum.
@StallFlight Unlisted posts aren't an issue and aren't affected by this.
@randomusername @CSP27 Maybe a 12 hour cooldown? That would be 2 per day.
@PhantomBladeCorp Would you care to elaborate? A simple "no" is fine, but an explanation might be more convincing.
@randomusername @CSP27 Three is too many. With three, only a handful of users could completely wipe the front page clean of posts, subjecting everyone else to much less attention.
Make moving parts last. If it has a rotator, piston or detacher then add it after everything else is finished. You are wasting time if you do it sooner because you'll just end up having to do it again later.
+2Literally no one cares.
+1Listen to @RailfanEthan
He is wise in all things, except stuff that isn't trains
+1@RailfanEthan Troof
Absolutely beautiful, but I wish you had made working ailerons. Seeing moving parts poke out of the wings makes me cringe every time.
Can't people just see that from your "posts" list?
Chopper McChopperface
@WNP78 If you could link me when the mod is released, I'd be grateful.
+1The camera view is exactly one block up from the base of the camera.
This is useful because it means the camera can be easily concealed and only requires minimal effort to line up.
Making it easier to line up at the cost of concealment would be one step forward, three steps back.
You should use the off topic tag, women love men who use tags appropriately. Also, don't ask for romantic advice on a gaming website.
PS, good luck with the depression. One foot in front of the other, time will help.
+3Hey Chief
The camo looks excellent.