@ShatterFox there are political forums all over the Internet. This is not one of them. On the forums section I would like to see posts about planes. I don't care who you support, but support them somewhere else. We are supposed to be the airplane community, not Facebook.
The trick with ships is to make one line of fusulage sections on the bottom without any buoyancy, and then another with just enough buoyancy, that will also be at least half submerged. You can put fuel in the bottom of the hull. Best way to make the rudder, as far as I know, is to put structural wing on the rotator. If you need me to elaborate, just say it.
@Benny332D2003 thats why I'm saying this. I used this principle once. I put out a demo/test/first version and wait for the advice on what to improve. I'm not forcing you, just giving the friendly advice. Your planes are really nice, and I would like to see them being even better.
Not bad, but I have a few tips for improving it. Move the landing gear on the engines to the rear of the engine housing, remove tail weel and add some dead weight to the nose. Also it would be a major improvement for the look of the plane if you round the wing tips and expand the tips of all tail surfaces.
Why not both? I am playing on my smartphone so I have 350-450 Part limit, so I don't have to spend so much time. Also, I am using standardized components, like instrument panels I have made separately. Also, I will often upload a plane, and then see that it would also look good if I simply reposition the wings, change paint scheme and add a few details. So I am keeping a steady output of 2-3 planes a day.
@Ace360 last version of this ship, since my phone cannot support any more details. I will now probably return to making planes, but there will be more ships in the future.
@Meawk I will hardly be able to add detachers to boats, and rudders are already rotator based. I will enlarge them in the final version. Also, I am thinking of simply adding another intake to boost speed. Do you think it will be enough?
@Cedy117 @Meawk what is the speed? Does it need more trust? Any other flaws? Update that I will make in the morning will be a final version. Any small and simple details that could make it better? Nothing big cuz my phone will burst into flames if I try to add anything big.
@Cedy117 thanks. Next one is even better. And much bigger. And so detailed that I couldn't test it on my phone. Could you test it for me and give me feedback? I'll tag you on it.
I NEED A FEEDBACK. I AM STRESSIG OUT CUZ I DON'T KNOW HOW IT SAILS. I CAN'T TEST IT ON MY PHONE, SO PLEASE, SOMEONE, ANYONE, TEST IT AND TELL ME HOW IT BEHAVES.
Well, the question was about slow firing gun that I need for my ships, something to mimic the work of 45-50mm canon. So do you have that and may I copy it? I can't make that myself, as I don't have a slightest idea what values to type in.
Why don't you just use "YouTuber Jelly" tag? Click "edit tags" button under the picture of your plane. Then type Jelly into search box, and click the button saying "YouTuber Jelly".
If someone can make machine guns have lower rate of fire, and damage just high enough to take down a bridge, let me know. And by lower rate of fire I mean one round in 5-10 seconds.
Click "edit tags" button under the picture of your plane. Then type Jelly into search tab and click on the YouTuber Jelly button that will pop up in tags list. That will alert Jelly that you have made a plane especially for him. Also, tell other Jelly fans about this, since all the planes with Jelly in their name will be removed.
Who tampered with the text above? I am sure that I didn't write "SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACE". @ShatterFox ?
@TheTMac you are welcome. Tag me when/if you upload updated version, and you will certainly get at least one upvote, mine.
@ShatterFox there are political forums all over the Internet. This is not one of them. On the forums section I would like to see posts about planes. I don't care who you support, but support them somewhere else. We are supposed to be the airplane community, not Facebook.
@aerodummy you're welcome
@Skua @MediocrePlanes I don't think this site should be polluted with politics. Is it even by the rules?
You should have given proper credit in the description.
@ShatterFox looks stolen. Your opinion?
The trick with ships is to make one line of fusulage sections on the bottom without any buoyancy, and then another with just enough buoyancy, that will also be at least half submerged. You can put fuel in the bottom of the hull. Best way to make the rudder, as far as I know, is to put structural wing on the rotator. If you need me to elaborate, just say it.
I misread the name at first ;)
@blooperdooper thanks. If you are into light aircraft, check out my other creations.
@Benny332D2003 thats why I'm saying this. I used this principle once. I put out a demo/test/first version and wait for the advice on what to improve. I'm not forcing you, just giving the friendly advice. Your planes are really nice, and I would like to see them being even better.
Not bad, but I have a few tips for improving it. Move the landing gear on the engines to the rear of the engine housing, remove tail weel and add some dead weight to the nose. Also it would be a major improvement for the look of the plane if you round the wing tips and expand the tips of all tail surfaces.
@Forwind @Cedy117 thanks guys
@TheMasterSoldier ok.
Try putting wider wings to prevent it from nose diving. Besides that, it looks good. Thanks for the credit.
Reported for Hate speech in the title
@TheMasterSoldier I see that you are into boats, so maybe you will like this.
Why not both? I am playing on my smartphone so I have 350-450 Part limit, so I don't have to spend so much time. Also, I am using standardized components, like instrument panels I have made separately. Also, I will often upload a plane, and then see that it would also look good if I simply reposition the wings, change paint scheme and add a few details. So I am keeping a steady output of 2-3 planes a day.
I know. My phone managed to run it for a few minutes before crashing, so I have managed to test this version personally.
@Meawk
@Cedy117
@Overland thanks
@Overland check out the successor.
@Ace360 last version of this ship, since my phone cannot support any more details. I will now probably return to making planes, but there will be more ships in the future.
@Overland that's how those old steamers sailed. I am doing a revision, making improvements and adding details.
@MrSilverWolf thanks. Check out update final version in few hours.
@MediocrePlanes sorry for what I'm gonna do now.
@Meawk I will hardly be able to add detachers to boats, and rudders are already rotator based. I will enlarge them in the final version. Also, I am thinking of simply adding another intake to boost speed. Do you think it will be enough?
@Cedy117 i will ad some trust, goal is around 18-23mph. Does it still say "engines don't have enough air"? Maby one more intake could fix that?
@Cedy117 @Meawk what is the speed? Does it need more trust? Any other flaws? Update that I will make in the morning will be a final version. Any small and simple details that could make it better? Nothing big cuz my phone will burst into flames if I try to add anything big.
@Cedy117 thanks for the feedback. I will see to it in the morning. @Meawk
@Cedy117 thanks. Next one is even better. And much bigger. And so detailed that I couldn't test it on my phone. Could you test it for me and give me feedback? I'll tag you on it.
I NEED A FEEDBACK. I AM STRESSIG OUT CUZ I DON'T KNOW HOW IT SAILS. I CAN'T TEST IT ON MY PHONE, SO PLEASE, SOMEONE, ANYONE, TEST IT AND TELL ME HOW IT BEHAVES.
@laSoul thanks
@Cedy117 you liked military version, I thought that you might also like this.
@Cedy117 thanks. Check out her "before the war" civilian version I have just posted.
@t8erh8er well, it sure would make precise building easier.
Well, the question was about slow firing gun that I need for my ships, something to mimic the work of 45-50mm canon. So do you have that and may I copy it? I can't make that myself, as I don't have a slightest idea what values to type in.
@tacos thanks.
Why don't you just use "YouTuber Jelly" tag? Click "edit tags" button under the picture of your plane. Then type Jelly into search box, and click the button saying "YouTuber Jelly".
@Delphinus may I steal it if it suites my purpose?
We already have such ability. It is xml moding, and you can do it on your phone, assuming that it is android.
If someone can make machine guns have lower rate of fire, and damage just high enough to take down a bridge, let me know. And by lower rate of fire I mean one round in 5-10 seconds.
@jsaret yup. Help support good Jellys. Try to convert them to true plane making. Make them desert the bastard. Steal his man. @Flightsonic @ShatterFox
@Flightsonic ok
It is. Note the tag YouTuber Jelly. But this is how you make a proper Jelly plane without upsetting the community @MrMecha
This is how you make a proper Jelly plane. If all Jellys were like this, this war on Jelly would have never come.
@Flightsonic suspicious?
@Cedy117 ok.
Click "edit tags" button under the picture of your plane. Then type Jelly into search tab and click on the YouTuber Jelly button that will pop up in tags list. That will alert Jelly that you have made a plane especially for him. Also, tell other Jelly fans about this, since all the planes with Jelly in their name will be removed.