248k EternalDarkness Comments

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch AI destroyer? I don't have those on mobile. As of my ship, I avoided it.

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch did that. It worked. Thanks

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch well, it drifted a little bit sideways =)

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch ok

  • Savo Mrkalj jet 9.8 years ago

    Gde mu nađe tako lepo ime =)

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch lol, that sounds fun. I don't have AI ships on Android, so I can't try to recreate that. Did you hit it with rockets or gun?

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @FlOu helicopter was made by DeezDucks. I asked him not to make it flyable because it would be too big.

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch thank you. @NIGHTWING1 @Glaceon M.Corp fleet is neutral in this war of yours, but will engage if provoked.

  • Critiques? 9.8 years ago

    I have noticed one major mistake that you make repeatedly. You use symmetric airfoil for main wings. Symmetric airfoil doesn't create any lift, and is good only for tail surfaces. For airliners, I recommend flat bottom airfoil. That will also allow you to make planes that have smaller wings in comparison with a fuselage while keeping them flyable.

  • Imaginary WW2 fighter 9.8 years ago

    @Blazeinfinity what's the problem? Maby I can help.

  • Imaginary WW2 fighter 9.8 years ago

    @Blazeinfinity great. Can't wait to see it

  • Imaginary WW2 fighter 9.8 years ago

    @Blazeinfinity reddit is a blog of blogs, so to say. In SP community, we often use it for the short term communication. For longer term communication, we usually use Google hangouts messenger.

  • Imaginary WW2 fighter 9.8 years ago

    @Blazeinfinity teasers are easy to make. You put pictures on imgur.com, copy their direct link, make a forum post saing ![write something in here. Anything. It won't show up if you do the rest correctly](paste a direct link to the picture here) and it will show the picture. Same goes for picture comments. You have to do it separately for each picture you want to post.

  • Executor class destroyer 9.8 years ago

    @AlphaOneIndustries this is more of a corvette. I have also made a destroyer. I will probably upload bare hulls for the destroyer and frigate, and you can take one of them as a base.

  • B332 Sport Plane ll 9.8 years ago

    @Benny332D2003 no problem. I'm here to help.

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @Cedy117 that would really be nice. If you want my opinion, go for it.

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @ElGatoVolador je srce Srbije

  • B332 Pigion 9.8 years ago

    Much better

  • B332 Sport Plane ll 9.8 years ago

    @TempestAviation yup, a definite improvement

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @Somethingismadebyme hvala

  • B332 Sport Plane ll 9.8 years ago

    @TempestAviation I know. He can be a great builder, that's why I'm encouraging him to give it more effort.

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @HetaliaAerospaceIndustries thank you

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @SteadfastContracting ok. Thanks for the upvote

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @TheGuyWhoFliesToGetHisPie thank you

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @TheMasterSoldier @SteadfastContracting accidentally deleted the first upload. Sorry

  • Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @TheGuyWhoFliesToGetHisPie @TheJohnnyMan @bjac0 thanks guys

  • MA 79 Fatty 9.8 years ago

    @TheGuyWhoFliesToGetHisPie thanks

  • B332 Sport Plane ll 9.8 years ago

    @Benny332D2003 I'm glad to hear that

  • B332 Sport Plane ll 9.8 years ago

    Benny, can I suggest something to you? You have enormous upload rate. There is nothing worse with that. The problem is that you mostly make low quality builds. That could get you in line with some of the infamous high-ranking players, which I don't want to name. Please put a bit more time into individual builds, look at them, see what you can improve, do it, look again, improve some more, and then upload them. Your builds are good basics, but they lack details. Please don't take this as negative critics, but as a friendly advice. If you need help with improving your builds, feel free to contact me.

  • TEASER Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @ShatterFox I'll upload hulls for both this and previous ship in a few days, and you can use them :)

  • TEASER Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @ShatterFox lol, don't. What would I do without my favorite derp?

  • TEASER Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @Warbrine what I accidentally proved with MA 80 is that the most important thing is the siluete. MA 80 doesn't have details, and is iny top 15 most upvoted builds

  • Dragon class destroyer 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch lol, no. It's a VTOL engine. In reality, propulsion of a ship of this kind would be a steam or gas turbine.

  • TEASER Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @Warbrine would you go to my profile and check out MA 80 Duckling? 44 parts and 20 upvotes. It's not in the complexity, but overall looks and functionality.

  • TEASER Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @AchillesDeath it currently has 459 parts. I might add a few more, if I notice something missing.

  • TEASER Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch I would, but I don't have a PC currently.

  • TEASER Protector class frigate 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch thank you

  • Imaginary WW2 fighter 9.8 years ago

    @Blazeinfinity message me on reddit. I use the same username.

  • MA 80 Duckling 9.8 years ago

    @MEGANOOB thanks

  • Dragon class destroyer 9.8 years ago

    @MEGANOOB thank you

  • WH40K Burna-Bommer ORK 9.8 years ago

    @Somethingismadebyme nema na čemu

  • Whirlwind Class Destroyer 9.8 years ago

    @Static no problem

  • What does your username mean? 9.8 years ago

    Last name + Airplanes. Just that. Totally imaginative.

  • MA 80 Duckling 9.8 years ago

    @JTM55 building that one could be tricky due to the engine being mounted so high. I might give it a shot, but I don't promise anything.

  • MA 80 Duckling 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch yup. Lag almost killed my phone, it was overheating constantly, but I made it

  • MA 80 Duckling 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch there are no in-game destroyers on Android

  • MA 80 Duckling 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch lol

  • Whirlwind Class Destroyer 9.8 years ago

    Rally nice ship. I like it

  • Dragon class destroyer 9.8 years ago

    @SimpleTechAndResearch the range of the ship. My phone can't support it for long enough to empty it's tanks, so I don't know the range. So I simply said it's classified

  • MA 80 Duckling 9.8 years ago

    @Cedy117 =}