@LiberatorWeaponAgency you only know the side of the story brodcasted by western media. War crimes were on both sides. War on kosovo was between JNA and OVK, which was supported by Alkaida. NATO stepped in for OVK to make its puppet state on Balkan Peninsula. No Bosnian, Croatian, or Albanian commander was held responsible. Only Serbs, because we were pro-russin, not pro-american like other factions.
@DanAviation build a lot of good stuff. I did that and got to platinum in 3 months and 3 days. Don't build for upvotes. Google "airplane", or "weird vehicle concept" or something if you are out of ideas. Check what you haven't made yet. Looking at your profile, I have to suggest: add details. Many of your builds are good bases for improvements. I could spend an hour on many of them, and make them much better by adding details. You can do the same. No slacking. When you build it, save it, and come back to it tomorrow. Look at it for 15 minutes, and think what you can add. That way, you'll get to the dark side.
@Toscio56 I'm not asking you to explain and show me every single detail, or how to use Google to find info about something. What I'm interested in is the general technique you use to achieve such performance. I could probably figure it out myself, but I'm too busy these days. Anyway, thanks for considering...
I have upvoted this plane when I first saw it. Since then, it has been sitting in my favorites. I finally came around to test it.
Conclusion:
How do I upvote one model twice? Great overall look, excellent cockpit, perfect maneuvering... Have you thought about making a tutorial for making planes like this? I'm impressed.
@ChasingHorizon I don't care. My hulls are built in under 10 minutes a piece. It's a simple technique. I know at least one user who used it before me, and at least one who discovered them independently few days ago.
Quite a good concept. The plane itself is a bit sluggish on controls, but that's what makes landing it without wheels so easy. Overall, I like it.
A suggestion: if not the wheels, then why not a rail under it's nose? It would allow it to land like a glider.
@TheLatentImage I couldn't agree more. Only problem is a bug that came into existence with 1.4. When I download a plane, I need to find it in the file browser and open it from there. Then, due to performance of my phone, I have to close file browser in order to play with the plane I downloaded. Because of that, since 1.4. came out, I'm downloading only the best looking models. Once devs fix that, I'll probably be downloading a lot more.
In case that @AndrewGarrison notices this comment, the device is Sony Xperia E4g.
@CaliphIndustries "we don't talk about it" was answer to CL4TRP mentioning secret community of top quality builders. For you, and anyone else, my advice is: Use xml, Fine Tuner mod, nudge.
Take your time. You can't make a great model in under five hours in editor.
Focus on details. If it doesn't look appling, it probably won't even be downloaded. For the same reason, take good screenshots. Experiment with angles, try to catch the best of it... Also, for the same reason, use bright, lively colors.
Of course, in the end, it's performance that sells it. If it looks good, but flies/rolls bad, it's bad.
Nice work. I like how it's done. Maybe you could just mention in description where you got that tower? It's from my Voivode class destroyer. I don't mind you using it, but please give credit.
@HarperAstrionics now to answer your suggestions:
-Heatseeking missile-Interceptor
-Turrets-They are easy to build
-lines of panels and control surfaces-Most of my planes have them. Easy to make.
-Countermeasures-Yes, we need those.
@HarperAstrionics xml editing is, or at least it used to be, what separates good builders from bad ones. That's the magic you need to have. There are, of course, additional techniques that allow IOS users to be good at this game. Example is Cedy117. He also has buddies doing xml stuff for him (me being one of them). Introducing all of those parts would be unfair to us who practiced xml editing, and would allow any noob to make top quality planes. Thus, I don't support adding them. I do, however, support adding things that are impossible to make via xml (like transparent block) or build. For example, I have already told publicly how to make a prop work under water. You can use that to make a torpedo. If we had unguided single rockets, I would make that 32 missile launcher myself. Xml is a part of gameplay here, and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
@ElysiumDarkness in the year 1999, NATO bombed Republic of Serbia, killing no less than 2500 civilians. As justification, they used Yugoslavian civil war. NATO bombing raids were intentionally targeted against civilians. One of numerous proofs for that is a video of two TV guided air to ground missiles launched from A10 hitting passenger train. Also, NATO forces used deplated uranium ordinance in populated areas. Nobody has been held responsible for those crimes.
I am from Serbia.
@UnloadedRex the problem is that the wings are angled 5* downward. Angled wings always mirror incorrectly. My advice is to simply replace the wings, or disassemble them, rotate everything to 0*, and reassemble them.
Well, I guess it has something to do with luck. Your latest build (the one I upvoted) really is a good one. Keep that level of quality, and upvots will hopefully come.
Interesting idea, @SimpleFlow. Upvote for creativit..
@LiberatorWeaponAgency you only know the side of the story brodcasted by western media. War crimes were on both sides. War on kosovo was between JNA and OVK, which was supported by Alkaida. NATO stepped in for OVK to make its puppet state on Balkan Peninsula. No Bosnian, Croatian, or Albanian commander was held responsible. Only Serbs, because we were pro-russin, not pro-american like other factions.
So cool. Great job, buddy. Keep it up!
@DanAviation build a lot of good stuff. I did that and got to platinum in 3 months and 3 days. Don't build for upvotes. Google "airplane", or "weird vehicle concept" or something if you are out of ideas. Check what you haven't made yet. Looking at your profile, I have to suggest: add details. Many of your builds are good bases for improvements. I could spend an hour on many of them, and make them much better by adding details. You can do the same. No slacking. When you build it, save it, and come back to it tomorrow. Look at it for 15 minutes, and think what you can add. That way, you'll get to the dark side.
@Stingray no problem
@DestinyAviation I'm glad that you did. I would start following you now, but I already am.
Nice. I like the details on it.
Yey, my suggestion was accepted 0,_,0
@DestinyAviation glad to hear it. Tag me on it, I want to play with it.
@Toscio56 I'm not asking you to explain and show me every single detail, or how to use Google to find info about something. What I'm interested in is the general technique you use to achieve such performance. I could probably figure it out myself, but I'm too busy these days. Anyway, thanks for considering...
@mikoyanster thanks
@Johndfg no problem. I asked for An2, and you did a great job delivering one.
@AndrewGarrison I'm using Opera to download. Later I access them via ES file explorer. I never had that problem before 1.4.
@warlord1128 no problem, but keep it in mind from now on please.
@TheInvisible no problem.
@CaliphIndustries no problem, buddy. Advice is easy to give and free to take.
Well, I'm glad I helped, at least indirectly. Good work, my friend. I'll be looking forward to your future builds @TheInvisible.
@Noman0rumeral no problem
Simple and effective, just like the real one. Good job.
I have upvoted this plane when I first saw it. Since then, it has been sitting in my favorites. I finally came around to test it.
Conclusion:
How do I upvote one model twice? Great overall look, excellent cockpit, perfect maneuvering... Have you thought about making a tutorial for making planes like this? I'm impressed.
@ChasingHorizon I don't care. My hulls are built in under 10 minutes a piece. It's a simple technique. I know at least one user who used it before me, and at least one who discovered them independently few days ago.
Quite a good concept. The plane itself is a bit sluggish on controls, but that's what makes landing it without wheels so easy. Overall, I like it.
A suggestion: if not the wheels, then why not a rail under it's nose? It would allow it to land like a glider.
@TheLatentImage I couldn't agree more. Only problem is a bug that came into existence with 1.4. When I download a plane, I need to find it in the file browser and open it from there. Then, due to performance of my phone, I have to close file browser in order to play with the plane I downloaded. Because of that, since 1.4. came out, I'm downloading only the best looking models. Once devs fix that, I'll probably be downloading a lot more.
In case that @AndrewGarrison notices this comment, the device is Sony Xperia E4g.
No problem @Benny3053
Congrats
Great job. I love it.
@Polandball you sunk a destroyer with a patrol boat?! Cool.
@CaliphIndustries "we don't talk about it" was answer to CL4TRP mentioning secret community of top quality builders. For you, and anyone else, my advice is: Use xml, Fine Tuner mod, nudge.
Take your time. You can't make a great model in under five hours in editor.
Focus on details. If it doesn't look appling, it probably won't even be downloaded. For the same reason, take good screenshots. Experiment with angles, try to catch the best of it... Also, for the same reason, use bright, lively colors.
Of course, in the end, it's performance that sells it. If it looks good, but flies/rolls bad, it's bad.
@Polandball you gonna try again?
@Polandball great. Send me a link when it's out. I wanna see =3
@CL4TRP we don't talk about it 😉
Serbiaball next, plox?
Nice work. I like how it's done. Maybe you could just mention in description where you got that tower? It's from my Voivode class destroyer. I don't mind you using it, but please give credit.
@HarperAstrionics sorry if I'm a bit harsh, but that's my opinion as a medium-high detail builder.
@HarperAstrionics now to answer your suggestions:
-Heatseeking missile-Interceptor
-Turrets-They are easy to build
-lines of panels and control surfaces-Most of my planes have them. Easy to make.
-Countermeasures-Yes, we need those.
@HarperAstrionics xml editing is, or at least it used to be, what separates good builders from bad ones. That's the magic you need to have. There are, of course, additional techniques that allow IOS users to be good at this game. Example is Cedy117. He also has buddies doing xml stuff for him (me being one of them). Introducing all of those parts would be unfair to us who practiced xml editing, and would allow any noob to make top quality planes. Thus, I don't support adding them. I do, however, support adding things that are impossible to make via xml (like transparent block) or build. For example, I have already told publicly how to make a prop work under water. You can use that to make a torpedo. If we had unguided single rockets, I would make that 32 missile launcher myself. Xml is a part of gameplay here, and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
@ElysiumDarkness NATO does what NATO wants...
@ElysiumDarkness in the year 1999, NATO bombed Republic of Serbia, killing no less than 2500 civilians. As justification, they used Yugoslavian civil war. NATO bombing raids were intentionally targeted against civilians. One of numerous proofs for that is a video of two TV guided air to ground missiles launched from A10 hitting passenger train. Also, NATO forces used deplated uranium ordinance in populated areas. Nobody has been held responsible for those crimes.
I am from Serbia.
@UnloadedRex no problem, buddy. I love your conversions.
Really nice. If you want more references, here's it's land based version.
@CaesiciusPlanes no offense, but I have a really good reason to dislike NATO aircraft. When I build interceptor, feel free to add USAF markings on it.
@UnloadedRex the problem is that the wings are angled 5* downward. Angled wings always mirror incorrectly. My advice is to simply replace the wings, or disassemble them, rotate everything to 0*, and reassemble them.
@CaesiciusPlanes I might make an interceptor, but most certainly not US Airforce.
@ElysiumDarkness thank you, my friend. I'm happy to have such a great supporter.
Thanks @FlOu. I'm really glad you like it. I do consider this the best plane I made so far. How's the army stuff going?
@Johndfg no problem
@Johndfg no need. I'm following you since you were bronze.
@Benny3053 no problem
@ChasingHorizon lol
Well, I guess it has something to do with luck. Your latest build (the one I upvoted) really is a good one. Keep that level of quality, and upvots will hopefully come.