@breitling there are people who have been making theirs from the moment I posted a challenge, and aren't even halfway done. 20min build wouldn't stand a chance.
It doesn't meet the requirements. Challenge asks for a realistic trainer with more than 150 parts. And seeing other entries, I'd say you wouldn't have much chance of winning anyway. I suggest taking apart other peoples builds to see how they are made, improving your technique, and entering some future contest.
@DemonSniper8 I'm not sure, but I think this plane just slipped off the four shown featured designs because four other designs have been featured after it.
@TornadoRUS in XML, set cordScale to somewhere between 10 and 20, depending on how deep your propeller is. It will make it both work and look like a ship propeller.
@Aluminium if you can make a trainer that would suit its role in real life with those features, feel free to do it. There were some weird trainers, like RFB Fantrainer and KB SAT SR-10.
@grizzlitn no. I can't permit mod parts, as they would be unfair advantage over iOS users. Also, try to keep part count under 1k please. Looking forward to your entry.
This is a good example of a successor post. It is a successor to the build that gave more parts, and it gives credit to both builders from who parts were taken. And the idea is kinda interesting.
@Homemadeforthepros you have potential in this area. You can see some of my hulls for ideas and techniques. Also, you forgot to leave room for props on this one. You can use my underwater props on your future boats if you want, or mod your own. The trick is to edit "cordScale" to around 10. Usually a bit more.
This is off-topic! Not a plane! Report!!!
Just kidding, it's a pretty nice boat. May I suggest using an inlet to get the angled bow on your next? Or an axe bow?
Unfortunately, this entry doesn't meet the requirement of minimum part count. Challenge asks for 150 parts or more. Also, complex mechanisms and special features (custom control surfaces and similar) are to be rated. This build doesn't have any.
@SummonerOfThunderstorms I have commented on your previous upload of this plane, saying that the rudder is turning wrong way, and that it could use some paint job, but that I like it for performance. You replied something before you deleted it to fix the rudder. I got a notification. But I didn't see it before you deleted it to upload the fixed version.
@Minecraftpoweer I don't. But you should be able to simply grab a spring (little round thingies you see from under it are springs), and attach in the same manner.
@Jamesgamer1201 I'm glad you enjoyed using it. You can check out other versions. They are linked in description.
Thanks for (yet another) entry :)
Thanks for the entry
Thanks for the entry
Just log into SR2 like you do into SP. Your account, along with your mail, is saved for SR2. No need to register a new account.
@Alienbeef0421 I'm glad to hear that
@F104Deathtrap that's great
@F104Deathtrap you haven't seen a thing yet. I've been looking at some of my chats, and many amazing entries are yet to come.
Welcome back. Are you back to building too, or just to the site?
@breitling there are people who have been making theirs from the moment I posted a challenge, and aren't even halfway done. 20min build wouldn't stand a chance.
It doesn't meet the requirements. Challenge asks for a realistic trainer with more than 150 parts. And seeing other entries, I'd say you wouldn't have much chance of winning anyway. I suggest taking apart other peoples builds to see how they are made, improving your technique, and entering some future contest.
@Alienbeef0421 you're gonna make one?
@Homemadeforthepros sure
Congrats
Thanks for the entry
Thanks for the entry. Can you please just use tags? (they are right above description)
@DemonSniper8 I'm not sure, but I think this plane just slipped off the four shown featured designs because four other designs have been featured after it.
It's a good plane. It has realistic proportions and stuff. Shame it didn't stay featured for longer, but it's still on the front page, a bit lower.
2 or 3
@TornadoRUS in XML, set cordScale to somewhere between 10 and 20, depending on how deep your propeller is. It will make it both work and look like a ship propeller.
Thanks for the entry
Thanks for the entry
@Aluminium if you can make a trainer that would suit its role in real life with those features, feel free to do it. There were some weird trainers, like RFB Fantrainer and KB SAT SR-10.
@Aluminium what do you mean?
@grizzlitn cool
@Minecraftpoweer no problem
I like it. I'm glad you managed to adapt the suspension.
@grizzlitn no. I can't permit mod parts, as they would be unfair advantage over iOS users. Also, try to keep part count under 1k please. Looking forward to your entry.
Thanks for the entry
@Minecraftpoweer cannon on that thing is more of a howitzer. It's more adapted to firing squash head than kinetic penetrators.
I suggest giving it a longer barrel. Other than that, it looks good.
This is a good example of a successor post. It is a successor to the build that gave more parts, and it gives credit to both builders from who parts were taken. And the idea is kinda interesting.
@Homemadeforthepros you have potential in this area. You can see some of my hulls for ideas and techniques. Also, you forgot to leave room for props on this one. You can use my underwater props on your future boats if you want, or mod your own. The trick is to edit "cordScale" to around 10. Usually a bit more.
This is off-topic! Not a plane! Report!!!
Just kidding, it's a pretty nice boat. May I suggest using an inlet to get the angled bow on your next? Or an axe bow?
Nice. I love the interior of it.
Unfortunately, this entry doesn't meet the requirement of minimum part count. Challenge asks for 150 parts or more. Also, complex mechanisms and special features (custom control surfaces and similar) are to be rated. This build doesn't have any.
@trippleace ok then
@SummonerOfThunderstorms I'm a bit busy right now. I'll do a bit of paint on this plane to show you how. It might come useful on your future builds.
That's a nice start
@SummonerOfThunderstorms I have commented on your previous upload of this plane, saying that the rudder is turning wrong way, and that it could use some paint job, but that I like it for performance. You replied something before you deleted it to fix the rudder. I got a notification. But I didn't see it before you deleted it to upload the fixed version.
I didn't get to see your reply on the previous upload
I've seen successor challenges with fewer successors
@Minecraftpoweer no problem
@Minecraftpoweer I don't. But you should be able to simply grab a spring (little round thingies you see from under it are springs), and attach in the same manner.
@Minecraftpoweer ok. You can try to mimic this one. If you need tips, just say.
@SledDriver I'm glad to hear that.
@SledDriver many people can. Only low end devices can't run it.
It looks great. More detailed than your usual.
Unfortunately, this entry doesn't meet the requirement of minimum part count. Challenge asks for 150 parts or more.
@Jacobdaniel you mean XML edit? Sure.