@XxcreedexX if you want to counter me, following my philosophy of darkness not as the absence of light, but absence of existence, you should change your username into eternal chaos, since chaos is, again, in my philosophy, unorganized existence of everything. Yet, as the chaos was created from darkness, it is not eternal.
@Glaceon it happens to me often in the balancing stage of my buidls (the part where I make it fly). You need smaller pitch control surfaces or to move CoM and CoL further apart
@Oicraftian this kind of cranked delta wing? I know that the nose is not how you imagined it and it's a single engine, but this is as close as I could get with the limited time I had today. I might start working on your dream plane soon, if you give me some pictures. Perhaps you could upload the drawing you mentioned. I will probably not follow it perfectly, but I might try to make something similar.
@Oicraftian well, sounds too different from my usual style. I have done some experiments with cranked delta wing on this fuselage. I might consider making a big, twin engine, high altitude, cranked delta wing interceptor in the future, but probably not quite soon.
@Oicraftian well, it pritty much was my original intent while I was building it. Then I found out that, with its performance and size, it would be a shame to only use it to train new pilots.
@Oicraftian I never meant to insult Bf109, as I too like that old plane. As I have mentioned in the reply to your first comment, I have based the description upon Rogožarski Ik3, that could easily outmaneuver older Bf109s although it was significantly slower.
@Glaceon @Oicraftian guys, would you please stop arguing? I don't care who started it and why, I'm annoyed by notifications about your argument on my post. If you PM each other on reddit, you can even curse at each other, you know. Much better way to do this.
@Blazeinfinity thanks. I have designed my cocpits to resemblance of a few training jets whose pictures I've seen, scaling them up a bit for the sake of aesthetics. I might correct that on my future builds, if I find it visually attractive.
@Upquark what device are you using? My low end Xperia E4g can run up to 750 parts for non-airplanes and around 300 for planes on high settings. Three quarters of that without lag.
@TehDuck that's a lot of details. The upper one really looks appealing. We might try to build something like that. Not a replica, since I categorically don't make those, but something in that style. I'll do the hull, and we'll see from there.
@RazgrizDesigns U-2 is big and slow high altitude reconnaissance. This one would do low altitude, high speed flyovers, basically being attack aircraft with cameras to capture what satellites can't.
@DatsunVehiclesCompany there are a few very complicated reasons. One of them is, I wanted to remove my last name from being too visible. All others are either private or philosophical.
@RazgrizDesigns if you have some other ideas about reconnaissance jet, tell me. I'm making military jets series anyway, and a bit of inspiration would come in handy
@Cedy117 thanks
@Blazeinfinity woah, I didn't even notice. Thanks for alerting me
@bobthetitan thanks
@XxcreedexX if you want to counter me, following my philosophy of darkness not as the absence of light, but absence of existence, you should change your username into eternal chaos, since chaos is, again, in my philosophy, unorganized existence of everything. Yet, as the chaos was created from darkness, it is not eternal.
@XxcreedexX I know. I'm following you.
@XxcreedexX yes I did. Do you like it?
It is a complete copy of my plane. It is not even repainted, and the part count is the same. Not a single detail is changed.
@Glaceon that is my assumption based on the description of the problem. I'm mobile, so I can't download it.
Thanks @AndrewGarrison
@Glaceon it happens to me often in the balancing stage of my buidls (the part where I make it fly). You need smaller pitch control surfaces or to move CoM and CoL further apart
Does it roll a little bit or violently spins out of control?
@AeroMobil no problem
@BaconAircrafts @TheGuyWhoFliesToGetHisPie thanks guys
@General360 thank you Gen
@AeroMobil thank you, my friend. I appreciate your support
@AeroMobil thank you
@General360 MaleticAirplanes
@AeroMobil woops, typo. I'll fix it
@Oicraftian this kind of cranked delta wing? I know that the nose is not how you imagined it and it's a single engine, but this is as close as I could get with the limited time I had today. I might start working on your dream plane soon, if you give me some pictures. Perhaps you could upload the drawing you mentioned. I will probably not follow it perfectly, but I might try to make something similar.
@Solarisaircraft thank you. I appreciate the kind words
@kikasshes thanks
@Oicraftian well, sounds too different from my usual style. I have done some experiments with cranked delta wing on this fuselage. I might consider making a big, twin engine, high altitude, cranked delta wing interceptor in the future, but probably not quite soon.
@Oicraftian seems like a good concept. What kind of nose piece?
@Glaceon lol
@Oicraftian well, it pritty much was my original intent while I was building it. Then I found out that, with its performance and size, it would be a shame to only use it to train new pilots.
@Glaceon GET OUT!
@Oicraftian I never meant to insult Bf109, as I too like that old plane. As I have mentioned in the reply to your first comment, I have based the description upon Rogožarski Ik3, that could easily outmaneuver older Bf109s although it was significantly slower.
It's cute
@Glaceon @Oicraftian guys, would you please stop arguing? I don't care who started it and why, I'm annoyed by notifications about your argument on my post. If you PM each other on reddit, you can even curse at each other, you know. Much better way to do this.
@Blazeinfinity finally someone who likes it =)
@AeroEngineering @Blazeinfinity I seem to be the only one that didn't like my old username...
@Blazeinfinity thanks. I have designed my cocpits to resemblance of a few training jets whose pictures I've seen, scaling them up a bit for the sake of aesthetics. I might correct that on my future builds, if I find it visually attractive.
@humangrenade it would seem that everyone except me did
@RhysBrown no problem. It's a great build.
@Upquark what device are you using? My low end Xperia E4g can run up to 750 parts for non-airplanes and around 300 for planes on high settings. Three quarters of that without lag.
Nice. Those eyes are really cute
Happy birthday buddy. All the best wishes
@RedFalcon thank you
@Kimo thanks. You'll get used to it eventually =)
@OldColonel thanks
@JTM55 no. I have just changed my username
@TehDuck that's a lot of details. The upper one really looks appealing. We might try to build something like that. Not a replica, since I categorically don't make those, but something in that style. I'll do the hull, and we'll see from there.
@DatsunVehiclesCompany MaleticAirplanes
@TehDuck what kind of ship do you have in mind?
@RazgrizDesigns U-2 is big and slow high altitude reconnaissance. This one would do low altitude, high speed flyovers, basically being attack aircraft with cameras to capture what satellites can't.
@DatsunVehiclesCompany there are a few very complicated reasons. One of them is, I wanted to remove my last name from being too visible. All others are either private or philosophical.
@SimpleTechAndResearch yeah, although I usually use Hangouts for that. I never actually did a real colab. Just fixing other people's planes and ships.
@SimpleTechAndResearch I've seen. I always upload unlisted first, to write the description and see how it all looks when uploaded.
@SimpleTechAndResearch fine. Just don't forget when you are tagging me. Still friends?
@RazgrizDesigns if you have some other ideas about reconnaissance jet, tell me. I'm making military jets series anyway, and a bit of inspiration would come in handy