@Razr wherever. They are just xml edited small prop engines. Just don't try to enter their settings. That returns blade thickness to normal, removing their ability to work under water.
@DavidTheFlyingHippo your successor to this boat has been removed without my request. In that comment, I was just a bit annoyed by the fact that I too considered putting my standard canon on it, but I wasn't pleased with how it looked. Upload it again and I will put a comment saying the mods not to remove it again. Sorry for the inconvenience.
That would take away all the fun of making your plane stable. Also, it would remove all the need for skill. Gyro for helicopters, on the other hand, would be really useful. Best if it's made as a helicopter rotor with rotors gyroscopic effect.
Two major problems of the community have been resolved. Although, in my opinion, it should be two planes a day. Great work as always, @AndrewGarrison.
EDIT: I just noticed the "rules" button. Should help resolve the "new users breaking the rules" problem. Three hits at once.
@2411181496 I didn't even notice. I was referring to the destroyer (or a large frigate) that is currently lagging my editor. I'm glad that you find my ships inspiring.
Thanks @Cedy117
@Benny3053 I'm fine too. I'm back on shipbuilding.
@Benny3053 no problem, buddy
@Benny3053 how are you doing? That Ferus series of yours looks nice. You gonna strap some jets to it? It would make a great futuristic fighter.
I'm still alive, @Benny3053. I just changed my username.
Ugh, I'm currently busy with a big project of mine. Maybe in a few days
@luciozanassi anytime, buddy
Nice. You are really good at small planes.
@Razr wherever. They are just xml edited small prop engines. Just don't try to enter their settings. That returns blade thickness to normal, removing their ability to work under water.
@Razr to make propellers work under water, you must make them look like they should work under water. The width of the blade is the thing.
@ChaMikey no problem
@DavidTheFlyingHippo your successor to this boat has been removed without my request. In that comment, I was just a bit annoyed by the fact that I too considered putting my standard canon on it, but I wasn't pleased with how it looked. Upload it again and I will put a comment saying the mods not to remove it again. Sorry for the inconvenience.
If you want, you can feature any of my builds in your videos.
Maybe remake it with resizable fuselage blocks instead of square blocks. That would allow you much more accuracy and precise detailing.
It's nice. Maybe a better description explaining its functions and giving it a bit of background story would help get it some popularity.
Outstanding details, @MoterKade. The best car I've seen on SP. Unfortunately, my phone wouldn't handle it. Keep up the good work.
@luciozanassi no problem
@IndianaBones thanks
@FulkIndustriesDesignerAllanFulk no need for apologies. I'm looking forward to seeing your boat.
Top left corner. Just drag what you want to make into a subassembly to the top left corner.
That would take away all the fun of making your plane stable. Also, it would remove all the need for skill. Gyro for helicopters, on the other hand, would be really useful. Best if it's made as a helicopter rotor with rotors gyroscopic effect.
Nice. I love it
@DavidTheFlyingHippo no problem. Tag me when it's done, I don't want to miss it.
@FulkIndustriesDesignerAllanFulk ok. Do that
Two major problems of the community have been resolved. Although, in my opinion, it should be two planes a day. Great work as always, @AndrewGarrison.
EDIT: I just noticed the "rules" button. Should help resolve the "new users breaking the rules" problem. Three hits at once.
@iFalco great work. Looks good, flies good. Others will probably have a hard time outmatching that.
@DarkLithium take this apart
@2411181496 I didn't even notice. I was referring to the destroyer (or a large frigate) that is currently lagging my editor. I'm glad that you find my ships inspiring.
@Redlord nah. I got a few WIPs already. Maybe some other time.
@DavidTheFlyingHippo sure
@Madwarlus no problem
@MisterMasada thanks
Destruction of Hindenburg would be much more fun if that zeppelin was made like this.
What a coincidence. I was just working on something similar. Nice work.
@FlOu thanks, I'm glad that you like it.
@TNK8 thanks buddy
@drei yes. Just don't forget to credit me.
@bjac0 thanks
@JTM55 @Johndfg @Cedy117 thanks guys
@MisterMasada now you can. Just take propellers from this boat. The little jet engine in the bow is just for raising the bow.
@Geekpride SP physics doesn't care if your fuel tanks are full or empty. As far as I know, it doesn't reduce mass of the aircraft.
@Frant24 yes
@SimpleTechAndResearch weren't you a new user? Just summon back the memories from that time. No need for alt accounts.
@yeaaaaaaaaaa thanks buddy
For the underwater working propellers, look through my ships. I have at least three ships with underwater props.
@MisterMasada yes. Propellers spin and engines rotate left and right to steer the boat.
@MasterManufacturingCo thank you
@Frant24 if I understood well, Americans write MM/DD/YYYY
@jamesPLANESii yup. A cool boat for everyone!
@Frant24 European format. DD/MM/YYYY