@Gravity I do mind. The point of this challenge is to increase a number of good trainers on the site, since I have noticed a shortage. Reposting an existing one would be off point.
Thanks for the entry. I can somehow run this version, but still, I'd love a version with lower part count so I can do better testing of performance. I think reduction to 1000 parts would suffice.
On Gravatar.com. make sure you make an account there using the same mail as your SP account. It might take up to a few hours for it to show. Make sure you visit your account and turn "show gravatar" on.
Nice work. It looks great. I'll try it out tomorrow if I don't forget, and try to come up with some fixes for performance issues you stated. If I forget, feel free to remind me.
@F104Deathtrap I guess there are a few failed attempts. Some entries also failed to be successors. And many probably downloaded just to see how I made the picture, and were shocked to see how messy it acually is :)
@Tazziedevil04 you should try to get smother shapes. Low part count build can be very nice too. It just takes hours and days of work, like the high part build.
@Tazziedevil04 I'll rate all successors that weren't rejected, and the few non-successors linked in the comments. So, even if I forget, I won't miss your entry.
@Thoum I could accept it as it is, as it's cute, or you could add a few details and reupload.
@Gravity I do mind. The point of this challenge is to increase a number of good trainers on the site, since I have noticed a shortage. Reposting an existing one would be off point.
This is the only recognisable Piper Aerostar I could find on the whole site.
Lol, the last one is great. Others are a bit old.
Thanks for the entry. I can somehow run this version, but still, I'd love a version with lower part count so I can do better testing of performance. I think reduction to 1000 parts would suffice.
+1Unfortunately, rules say that trainer versions of fighters are not acceptable. Still, the plane is not bad. Have an upvote.
Thanks for the entry
Thanks for the entry
@Ethological whatever suits you. I'm glad to be of assistance
On Gravatar.com. make sure you make an account there using the same mail as your SP account. It might take up to a few hours for it to show. Make sure you visit your account and turn "show gravatar" on.
@Ian1231100 I will start judging on 26th, and I think it might get up to five days to judge everything.
@Datom I was just about to download it when it went away :/
It's amazing. Suspension is glitching out a bit, but it's still fun to drive. I like the 20mm gun. Very interesting feature.
@RailfanEthan no problem
Make a fuselage cylinder the size of the torpedo you need, and tell me dimensions. I'll make one for you.
British
lol
+2@chancey21 Othawne is Vincent on the chat.
@Marine no problem
+1Erm, 14,000 U.S.$? I guess that's a typo. The plane looks great.
Othawne is also a moderator. You forgot to mention him.
Thanks for the entry
+1Hey, you forgot to mention server's most amazingly awesome moderators!!!
+1You'll melt my laptop...
+1Realising your mistakes is a big first step. Second one is not repeating them. I hope we'll have you as a respectable user from now on.
+1Here you go
Upvote-worthy but imperfect. Reffer to Mostly's comment for details. We share an opinion.
@SpiritusRaptor thanks. The presentation took almost twenty minutes to make :)
Very nice
Thanks for the entry
I got 700 followers 0_o (shocked)
Which engine? All three prop engines and car engine use hp.
Thanks for the entry
Thanks for the entry
You can reduce brake torque in xml.
@SledDriver no problem
Nice work. It looks great. I'll try it out tomorrow if I don't forget, and try to come up with some fixes for performance issues you stated. If I forget, feel free to remind me.
@F104Deathtrap I guess there are a few failed attempts. Some entries also failed to be successors. And many probably downloaded just to see how I made the picture, and were shocked to see how messy it acually is :)
+2Thanks for the entry. Since description is also judged, I suggest giving our entry a better presentation. Also, use tags.
@Tazziedevil04 what do you mean by "helping my profile out"?
@Tazziedevil04 you should try to get smother shapes. Low part count build can be very nice too. It just takes hours and days of work, like the high part build.
@Tazziedevil04 ow. Yeah, I kinda forgot. It's been a while, m8.
@Tazziedevil04 I'll rate all successors that weren't rejected, and the few non-successors linked in the comments. So, even if I forget, I won't miss your entry.
@Tazziedevil04 poor device is a good enough excuse. Just put it somewhere in description so I don't forget.
Direct hit :)
Yes. Input you need is "Activate1". Replace "1" with the number of Ag you need
+4Ok
@newclear sure
@F104Deathtrap there's not much to be said. A few MiG-29s, a few obsolete attack aircraft, a few trainers...
@F104Deathtrap nope, Serbia. Since when does Canada fly Soviet/Russian planes, and planes of Serbian origin?